Log in

The consequences of undiagnosed obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) following vaginal delivery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

We aimed to compare anal and urinary incontinence symptoms and anal manometry between women with undiagnosed obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) and women who had OASIS diagnosed and repaired.

Methods

This was a matched retrospective cohort study. Each missed OASI was matched with a diagnosed OASI for severity [minor (3a/b) or major (3c)], parity and length of follow-up. Women completed the modified St Mark’s Incontinence Score and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire. Women with OASIS or those without OASIS but with anal incontinence symptoms were seen in perineal clinic for perineal examinations, anorectal manometry and three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound 8–12 weeks postnatally or in a subsequent pregnancy.

Results

Forty missed OASIS were matched with 40 recognised OASIS (16 3a/b; 24 3c). The median modified St Mark’s scores were higher for missed tears [11 (4, 15) vs. 1 (0, 4), p < 0.001] as well as the urinary incontinence scores [4 (0, 6) vs. 0 (0, 2), p = 0.01] than for the control group. Missed OASIS patients had a shorter perineal body [1.6 ± 1.3 vs. 2.4 ± 0.8, p = 0.009]. All missed OASIS had larger defects on endoanal ultrasound. One in four missed OASIS required further surgery [aOR 4.1 (95% CI 1.0–16.3), p = 0.04] and almost all needed colorectal input [aOR 24.1 (95% CI 7.3–80.0), p < 0.0001]. There were no differences in anal manometry.

Conclusions

Women with symptomatic missed OASIS are compromised in terms of anal and urinary incontinence symptoms, sphincter defect size and perineal body size requiring additional colorectal input. This highlights the importance of preventing OASIS and perseverance with training to diagnose OASIS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harvey MA, Pierce M. Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): prevention, recognition and repair. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015;37(12):1131–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Thiagamoorthy G, Johnson A, Thakar R, Sultan AH. National survey of perineal trauma and its subsequent management in the United Kingdom. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25:1621–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell DA, Edozien LC, Mahmood TA, Adams EJ, Richmond DH, et al. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears among primiparous women in England between 2000 and 2012: time trends and risk factors. BJOG. 2013;120(12):1516–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Andrews V, Thakar R, Sultan AH. Structured hands-on training in repair of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): an audit of clinical practice. Int Urogynecol J. 2009;20:1397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sultan AH, Thakar R. Third and fourth degree tears. In: Sultan AH, Thakar R, Fenner D, editors. Perineal and anal sphincter trauma. London: Springer; 2007. p. 33–51.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Thomas JM, Bartram CI. Anal-sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(26):1905–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Andrews V, Sultan AH, Thakar R, Jones PW. Occult anal sphincter injuries: myth or reality? BJOG. 2006;113:195–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Reid AR, Beggs AD, Sultan AH, Roos A-M, Thakar R. Outcome of repair of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) at three years. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2014;127:47–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ness W. Faecal incontinence: what influences care and management options? Br J Nurs. 2008;17(18):1148–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jordan PA, Naidu M, Thakar R, Sultan AH. Effect of subsequent vaginal delivery on bowel symptoms and anorectal function in women who sustained a previous obstetric anal sphincter injury. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(11):1579–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. The management of third- and fourth- degree perineal tears. Green-top Guideline No. 29 Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists (2015) https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg-29.pdf Accessed 25th February 2018.

  12. Roos AM, Sultan AH, Thakar R. St. Mark's incontinence score for assessment of anal incontinence following obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). Int Urogynecol J. 2009;20(4):407–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Avery K, Donovan J, Peters TJ, Shaw C, Gotoh M, Abrams P. ICIQ: a brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2004;23(4):322–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Roos AM, Thakar R, Sultan AH. Outcome of primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): does the grade of tear matter? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;36(3):368–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Starck M, Bohe M, Valentin L. Results of endosonographic imaging of the anal sphincter 2–7 days after primary repair of third- or fourth-degree obstetric sphincter tears. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;22:609–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Groom KM, Palerson-Brown S. Can we improve on the diagnosis of third-degree tears? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002;101:19–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Andrews V, Sultan AH, Thakar R, Jones PW. Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective study. Birth. 2006;33(2):117–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ozyurt S, Aksoy H, Gedikbasi A, Yildririm G, Aksoy U, Acmaz G, et al. Screening occult anal sphincter injuries in primigravid women after vaginal delivery with transperineal use of vaginal probe: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;292:853–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jango H, Langhoff-Roos J, Rosthoj S, Sakse A. Modifiable risk factors of obstetric anal sphincter injury in primiparous women: a population-based cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(1):59e1–59 e6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ramage L, Yen C, Qiu S, Simillis C, Kontovounisios C, Tan E, et al. Does a missed obstetric anal sphincter injury at time of delivery affect short-term functional outcome? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018;100:26–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. van Roon Y, Vinayakarao L, Melson L, Percival R, Pathak S, Pradhan A. Comparative study of episiotomy angles achieved by cutting with straight Mayo scissors and the EPISCISSORS-60 in a birth simulation model. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(7):1063–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Siddiqui NY, Ammarell N, Wu JM, Sandaval JS, Bosworth HB. Urinary incontinence and health-seeking behaviour among white, black and Latina women. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016;22(5):340–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Oberwald M, Connor J, Wener SD. Meta-analysis to determine the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter damage. Br J Surg. 2003;90:1333–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fornell EU, Mathiesen L, Sjodahl R, Berg G. Obstetric anal sphincter injury ten years after: subjective and objective long-term effects. BJOG. 2005;112:312–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kapoor DS, Thakar R, Sultan AH. Obstetric anal sphincter injuries: review of anatomical factors and modifiable second stage interventions. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(12):1725–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mathe M, Valancogne G, Atallah A, Sciard C, Doret M, Gaucherand P, et al. Early pelvic floor muscle training after obstetrical anal sphincter injuries for the reduction of anal incontinence. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;199:201–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Scheer I, Andrews V, Thakar R, Sultan AH. Urinary incontinence after obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) – is there a relationship? Int Urogynecol J. 2008;19(2):179–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Volloyhaug I, Taithongchai A, van Gruting I, Sultan AH, Thakar R. Levator ani morphology and function in women who have sustained obstetric anal sphincter injuries. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.20115.

  29. Jha S, Sultan AH. Obstetric anal sphincter injury: the changing landscape. BJOG. 2015;122(7):931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Taithongchai A, van Gruting IMA, Volloyhaug I, Arendsen LP, Sultan AH, Thakar R. Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of three ultrasound modalities for diagnosing obstetric anal sphincter injuries. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.04.009.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ranee Thakar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Ranee Thakar is currently the President of the International Urogynecology Association. The other authors have no financial disclaimers or conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Conference Presentations

Annual Meeting of the British Society of Urogynaecology, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London 9 November 2018

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Taithongchai, A., Veiga, S.I., Sultan, A.H. et al. The consequences of undiagnosed obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) following vaginal delivery. Int Urogynecol J 31, 635–641 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04033-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04033-5

Keywords

Navigation