Log in

Total transvaginal mesh (TVM) technique for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a 3-year prospective follow-up study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

To evaluate clinical outcomes at 3 years following total transvaginal mesh (TVM) technique to treat vaginal prolapse.

Methods

Prospective, observational study in patients with prolapse ≥stage II. Success was defined as POP-Q-stage 0-I and absence of surgical re-intervention for prolapse. Secondary outcome measures were: quality of life (QOL), prolapse-specific inventory (PSI), impact on sexual activity and complications.

Results

Ninety women underwent TVM repair, 72 a hysterectomy. Anatomical failure rate was 20.0% at 3 years. Three patients required re-intervention for prolapse. Improvements in QOL- and PSI-scores were observed at 1 and 3 years. Vaginal mesh extrusion occurred in 14.4% patients. After 3 years, 4.7% asymptomatic extrusions remained present. Of 61 sexually active women at baseline, a significant number of patients (41%) ceased sexual activity by 3 years; de novo dyspareunia was reported by 8.8%. One vesico-vaginal fistula resolved after surgery.

Conclusion

Medium-term results demonstrate that the TVM technique provides a durable prolapse repair.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BMI:

Body mass index

ICS:

International Continence Society

LOCF:

Last observation carried forward

POP:

Pelvic organ prolapse

POP-Q:

Pelvic organ prolapse quantification

PSI:

Prolapse-specific inventory

QOL:

Quality of life

SD:

Standard deviation

TVM:

Trans vaginal mesh

References

  1. Subak LL, Waetjen LE, van den Eeden S, Thom DH, Vittinghoff E, Brown JS (2001) Cost of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 98(4):646–651

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen Y, DeSautel M, Anderson A, Badlani G, Kushner L (2004) Collagen synthesis is not altered in women with stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 23(4):367–373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Reisenauer C, Shiozawa T, Oppitz M, Busch C, Kirschniak A, Fehm T, Drews U (2008) The role of smooth muscle in the pathogenesis of pelvic organ prolapse - an immunohistochemical and morphometric analysis of the cervical third of the uterosacral ligament. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19(3):383–389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boreham MK, Wai CY, Miller RT, Schaffer JI, Word RA (2002) Morphometric analysis of smooth muscle in the anterior vaginal wall of women with pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187(1):56–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Olsen A, Smith V, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89:501–506

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Denman MA, Gregory WT, Boyles SH, Smith V, Edwards SR, Clark AL (2008) Reoperation 10 years after surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198(5):555.e1–555.e5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Julian M (1996) The efficacy of Marlex mesh in the repair of severe, recurrent vaginal prolapse of the anterior midvaginal wall. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:1472–1475

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sand PK, Koduri S, Lobel RW, Winkler HA, Tomezsko J, Culligan PJ (2001) Prospective randomised trial of polyglactin 910 mesh to prevent recurrences of cystoceles and rectoceles. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:1357–1364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ulmsten U, Henriksson L, Johnson P, Varhos G (1996) An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 7:81–85

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Delorme E (2001) Transobturator Sling: a minimally invasive procedure to treat female stress incontinence. Prog Urol 11:1306–1313

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. de Leval J (2003) Novel surgical technique for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: transobturator vaginal tape inside-out. J Eur Urol 44:724–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Debodinance P, Berrocal J, Clavé H, Cosson M, Garbin O, Jacquetin B, Rosenthal C, Salet-Lizée D, Villet R (2004) Changing attitudes on the surgical treatment of urogenital prolapse: birth of the tension-free vaginal mesh. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 33:577–588

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fatton B, Amblard J, Debodinance P, Cosson M, Jacquetin B (2007) Transvaginal repair of genital prolapse: preliminary results of a new tension-free vaginal mesh (Prolift™ technique)—a case series multicentric study. Int Urogynecol J 18:743–752

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nguyen JN, Burchette RJ (2008) Outcome after anterior vaginal prolapse repair: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 111(4):891–898

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Elmér C, Altman D, Engh ME, Axelsen S, Väyrynen T, Falconer C, for the Nordic Transvaginal Mesh Group (2009) Trocar-guided transvaginal mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 113(1):117–126

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nieminen K, Hiltunen R, Heiskanen E, Takala T, Niemi K, Merikari M, Heinonen PK (2008) Symptom resolution and sexual function after anterior vaginal wall repair with or without polypropylene mesh. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19(12):1611–1616

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Withagen M, Milani A, Den Boon J, Vervest H, Vierhout M (2009) Tension free vaginal mesh compared to conventional vaginal prolapse surgery in recurrent prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20(Suppl):S153

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P, Shull BL, Smith AR (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175(1):10–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kobashi KC, Gormley EA, Govier F, Hadley R, Luber K, Nitti V (2000) Development of a validated quality of life measurement for patients with pelvic prolapse. Proceedings of the American Urological Association 95th Annual Meeting. J Urol 163:76

    Google Scholar 

  20. Benson JT, Lucente V, McClellan E (1996) Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: A prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:1418–1422

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sze EH, Kohli N, Miklos JR, Roat T, Karram MM (1999) A retrospective comparison of abdominal sacrocolpopexy with Burch colposuspension versus sacrospinous fixation with transvaginal needle suspension for the management of vault prolapse and coexisting stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 10(6):390–393

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Maher CF, Qatawneh AM, Dwyer PL, Carey MP, Cornish A, Schluter PJ (2004) Abdominal sacral colpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal wall prolapse: a prospective randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190:20–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Diwadkar GB, Barber MD, Feiner B, Maher C, Jelovsek JE (2009) Complication and reoperation rates after apical vaginal prolapse surgical repair: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 113(2 Pt 1):367–373

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Digesu GA, Chaliah C, Salvatore S, Hutchings A, Khullar V (2005) The relationship of vaginal prolapse severity to symptoms and quality of life. BJOG 112:971–976

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gutman R, Ford D, Quiroz L, Shippey S, Handa V (2008) Is there a pelvic organ prolapse threshold that predicts pelvic floor symptoms? Am J Obstet Gynecol 199:683.e1–683.e7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Swift SE, Tate SB, Nicholas J (2003) Correlation of symptoms with degree of pelvic organ support in a general population of women: what is pelvic organ prolapse? Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:372–379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Barber MD, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, Wheeler TL 2nd, Schaffer J, Chen Z, Spino C (2009) Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Defining success after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 114(3):600–609

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Collinet P, Belot F, Debodinance P, Ha Duc E, Lucot JP, Cosson M (2006) Transvaginal mesh technique for pelvic organ prolapse repair: mesh exposure management and risk factors. Int Urogynecol J 17:315–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lowman JK, Jones LA, Woodman PJ, Hale DS (2008) Does the Prolift system cause dyspareunia? Am J Obstet Gynecol 199(6):707.e1–707.e6

    Google Scholar 

  30. Altman D, Elmér C, Kiilholma P, Kinne I, Tegerstedt G, Falconer C, Nordic Transvaginal Mesh Group (2009) Sexual dysfunction after trocar-guided transvaginal mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 113(1):127–133

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

Bernard Jacquetin holds the patent for Prolift®, for which he receives royalties from Ethicon. B.Jacquetin, B. Fatton, C. Rosenthal, H. Clavé, P. Debodinance, O. Garbin, J. Berrocal, R. Villet, D. Salet Lizée and M. Cosson all have had consultancy positions for Ethicon. P. Hinoul and J. Gauld are employed by Ethicon.

Source of financial support

ETHICON Women’s Health & Urology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernard Jacquetin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jacquetin, B., Fatton, B., Rosenthal, C. et al. Total transvaginal mesh (TVM) technique for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a 3-year prospective follow-up study. Int Urogynecol J 21, 1455–1462 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1223-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1223-0

Keywords

Navigation