Log in

The Portuguese validation of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire—Vaginal Symptoms (ICIQ-VS) for Brazilian women with pelvic organ prolapse

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study is to validate the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire—Vaginal Symptoms (ICIQ-VS) in Portuguese. Two hundred four women (108 symptomatic, 94 asymptomatic, and two with no data) with mean age of 55.4 years received a Portuguese version of the ICIQ-VS. Clinical data and pelvic organ prolapse quantification index (POP-Q) were obtained. Retest was performed 3 weeks later. Responsiveness was assessed after 20 weeks of postsurgical follow-up. Overall, most patients presented POP-Q > 2. ICIQ-VS demonstrated good psychometric properties (validity, reliability and responsiveness). The test–retest reliability was moderate to excellent for all questions. The construct validation distinguished differences in ICIQ-VS scores between symptomatic (ICIQ-VS5a > 0) and asymptomatic (ICIQ-VS5a = 0) women. ICIQ-VS was highly responsive to surgical treatment and discriminated between levels of change in the vaginal symptoms score, sexual matters score, quality-of-life score, and POP-Q. The Portuguese version of ICIQ-VS was successfully validated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bump RC, Norton PA (1998) Epidemiology and natural story of pelvic floor dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 25(4):723–746

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jelovsek JE, Maher C, Barber MD (2007) Pelvic organ prolapse. Lancet 369(9566):1027–1038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barber MD, Walter MD, Bump RC (2005) Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol 193(1):103–113

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Digesu GA, Khullar V, Cardozo L, Robinson D, Salvatore S (2005) P-QOL: a validated questionnaire to assess the symptoms and quality of life of women with genital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 16(3):176–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Price N, Jackson S, Avery K, Brookes S, Abrams P (2006) Development and psychometric evaluation of the ICIQ Vaginal Symptoms Questionnaire: the ICIQ-VS. BJOG 113(6):700–712

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P et al (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175(1):10–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier Pulmsten U et al (2002) Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence SocietyThe standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 21(2):167–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Abrams P, Avery K, Gardener N, Donovan J, ICIQ Advisori Board (2006) The International Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaire: www.iciq.net. J Urol 175:1063–1066

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D (1993) Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related qualify of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 46:1417–1432

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Gladman DD (2000) Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol 53(5):459–468

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Padmanabhan P, Nitti VW (2006) Female stress urinary incontinence: how do patient and physician perspectives correlate in assessment of outcomes? Curr Opin Urol 16(4):212–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Digesu GA, Santamato S, Khullar V, Santilo V, Digesu A, Cormio G et al (2003) Validation of an Italian version of the prolapse quality of life questionnaire. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 106(2):184–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tamanini T, Dambros M, D’Ancona C, Palma P, Rodrigues Netto Jr N (2004) Validation of the “International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire—Short Form” (ICIQ-SF) for Portuguese. Rev Saúde Pública 38(3):438–444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hashim H, Avery K, Mourad MS, Chamssuddin A, Ghoniem G, Abrams P (2006) The Arabic ICIQ-UI SF: an alternative language version of the English ICIQ-UI SF. Neurourol Urodyn 25(3):277–282

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cam C, Sakalli M, Ay P, Cam M, Karateke A (2007a) Validation of the short forms of the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7) and the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) in a Turkish Population. Neurourol Urodyn 26(1):129–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cam C, Sakalli M, Ay P, Aran T, Cam M, Karateke A (2007b) Validation of the prolapse quality of life questionnaire (P-QOL) in a Turkish population. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 135(1):132–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Weber AM, Walters MD, Schover LR, Mitchinson A, Widrich T, Fazio V (1995) Sexual function in women with uterovaginal prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 85(4):483–487

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ellerkmann RM, Cundiff GW, Melick CF, Nihira MA, Leffler K, Bent AE (2001) Correlation of symptoms with location and severity of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185(6):1332–1337

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Barber A, Poujade O, Fay R, Thiebaugeorges O, Levardon M, Deval B (2007) Is primiparity, the only risk factor for type 3 and 4 perineal injury during delivery? Gynecol Obstet Fertil 35(2):101–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Genadry R (2006) A urogynecologist’s view of the pelvic floor effects of vaginal delivery/cesarean section for the urologist. Curr Urol Rep 7(5):376–383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by NUPEC, the clinical research center of the Brazilian Urological Society—São Paulo Section (Núcleo de Pesquisas Clínicas da Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia—Seção São Paulo). We thank Ms Elza Baracho for her technical support during the cross-cultural adaptation process. We also thank Ms Renata Cristina de Oliveira Souza Castro for her unconditional support during the data collection process.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Tadeu Nunes Tamanini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tamanini, J.T.N., Almeida, F.G., Girotti, M.E. et al. The Portuguese validation of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire—Vaginal Symptoms (ICIQ-VS) for Brazilian women with pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 19, 1385–1391 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-008-0641-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-008-0641-8

Keywords

Navigation