Log in

Flexibility improvement in two-point incremental forming by implementing multi-point die

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Among various incremental forming methods, two-point incremental forming (TPIF) is superior to single-point incremental forming (SPIF), but nonetheless, its flexibility is lower than SPIF. In this paper, in order to increase the flexibility of TPIF to form parts with free-form surfaces from an aluminum sheet, a supporting structure together with a reconfigurable multi-point die is implemented. The flexibility of TPIF process using the multi-point die is experimentally and numerically studied by forming a set of components comprising a hemisphere and free-form surfaces such as a scaled-down bulbous bow of a ship hull. The results showed that the proposed multi-point die has a high ability and flexibility in manufacturing of various symmetric and asymmetric components with different dimensions and geometries. In this regard, TPIF of a hemisphere using the rigid and presented flexible dies is experimentally and numerically compared. The results showed that the part formed using the multi-point die has an acceptable accuracy, but for improving the surface quality, the use of a rubber pad between pins and the aluminum sheet is inevitable. The effect of three different types of rubber and the influence of a polyurethane pad with three different hardness values on the thickness distribution and the dimensional accuracy were numerically studied. The results showed that the rubber type does not affect the minimum thickness, and the hemisphere produced using the natural and polyurethane rubbers has the highest and lowest dimensional accuracy, respectively. It was numerically shown that by increasing the hardness of the rubber pad, the minimum thickness and the dimensional accuracy are improved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Brazil)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shamsari M, Mirnia MJ, Elyasi M, Baseri H (2017) Formability improvement in single point incremental forming of truncated cone using a two-stage hybrid deformation strategy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol:1–12

  2. Lu H, Kearney M, Wang C, Liu S, Meehan PA (2017) Part accuracy improvement in two point incremental forming with a partial die using a model predictive control algorithm. Precis Eng 49:179–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hirt G, Ames J, Bambach M (2006) Basic investigation into the characteristics of dies and support tools used in CNC-incremental sheet forming, in Proceedings of the International Deep Drawing Research Group Conference, pp. 341–348

  4. Attanasio A, Ceretti E, Giardini C (2006) Optimization of tool path in two points incremental forming. J Mater Process Technol 177(1):409–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lasunon O, Knight W (2007) Comparative investigation of single-point and double-point incremental sheet metal forming processes. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 221(12):1725–1732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Taleb Araghi B, Bambach M, Hirt G (2009) Comparison of some final part geometrical characteristics of cylindrical cups manufactured by deep-drawing and two-point incremental sheet forming. Key Eng Mater 410:355–363 Trans Tech Publ

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li J-c, Chong L, Zhou T-g (2012) Thickness distribution and mechanical property of sheet metal incremental forming based on numerical simulation. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 22:s54–s60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Silva M, Martins P (2013) Two-point incremental forming with partial die: theory and experimentation. J Mater Eng Perform 22(4):1018–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lu B, Fang Y, Xu DK, Chen J, Ai S, Long H, Ou H, Cao J (2015) Investigation of material deformation mechanism in double side incremental sheet forming. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 93:37–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Moser N, Zhang Z, Ren H, Zhang H, Shi Y, Ndip-Agbor EE, Lu B, Chen J, Ehmann KF, Cao J (2016) Effective forming strategy for double-sided incremental forming considering in-plane curvature and tool direction. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 65(1):265–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang S, Cai Z, Li M, Lan Y (2012) Numerical simulation on the local stress and local deformation in multi-point stretch forming process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 60(9):901–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang Q-F, Cai Z-Y, Zhang Y, Li M-Z (2013) Springback compensation method for doubly curved plate in multi-point forming. Mater Des 47:377–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Peng H, Li M, Liu C, Fu W, Cao J (2014) Numerical simulation of multi-point forming accuracy for polycarbonate sheet. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering 228(2):87–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Luo Y, Yang W, Liu Z, Wang Y, Du R (2016) Numerical simulation and experimental study on cyclic multi-point incremental forming process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85(5–8):1249–1259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zareh-Desari B, Davoodi B, Vedaei-Sabegh A (2017) Investigation of deep drawing concept of multi-point forming process in terms of prevalent defects. Int J Mater Form 10(2):193–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Panjwani D et al (2017) A novel approach based on flexible supports for forming non-axisymmetric parts in SPISF. Int J Adv Manuf Technol:1–15

  17. Zhang H, Lu B, Chen J, Feng S, Li Z, Long H (2017) Thickness control in a new flexible hybrid incremental sheet forming process. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 231(5):779–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Boudhaouia S, Gahbiche MA, Ayed Y, Giraud E, Salem WB, Dal Santo P (2017) Experimental and numerical study of a new hybrid process: multi-point incremental forming (MPIF). Int J Mater Form:1–13

  19. Attanasio A, Ceretti E, Giardini C, Mazzoni L (2008) Asymmetric two points incremental forming: improving surface quality and geometric accuracy by tool path optimization. J Mater Process Technol 197(1):59–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ramezani M, Ripin Z, Ahmad R (2009) Numerical simulation of sheet stam** process using flexible punch. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 223(7):829–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang S, Cai Z, Li M (2010) Numerical investigation of the influence of punch element in multi-point stretch forming process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 49(5):475–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Belhassen L, Koubaa S, Wali M, Dammak F (2016) Numerical prediction of springback and ductile damage in rubber-pad forming process of aluminum sheet metal. Int J Mech Sci 117:218–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mirnia MJ, Vahdani M, Shamsari M (2018) Ductile damage and deformation mechanics in multistage single point incremental forming. Int J Mech Sci 136:396–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Majid Elyasi.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nourmohammadi, A.A., Elyasi, M. & Mirnia, M.J. Flexibility improvement in two-point incremental forming by implementing multi-point die. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 102, 2933–2952 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03307-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03307-y

Keywords

Navigation