SpringerLink
Log in

Investigation of effects of cutting insert rake face forms on surface integrity

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, the effects of cutting insert rake face forms and cutting parameters on the surface integrity in machining of AISI 316 L steel were investigated experimentally. The cutting forces occur during chip removal, surface roughness values on the machined surfaces with residual stresses on machined workpiece were measured, and metallurgical structure (microhardness and microstructural variations) of the surface layers formed as a result of machining were evaluated. The surface integrity was evaluated in terms of surface roughness, residual stress, microhardness, and microstructure analysis. In experiments, the best surface integrity results were obtained by cutting tools having QM form, and the worst surface integrity results were obtained by cutting tools having MR form. Under all these cutting conditions, it was observed that the surface integrity worsened when depth of cut and cutting feed were increased; however, the surface integrity improved when cutting speed was increased. In terms of cutting parameters, the best surface integrity was obtained with cutting speed 200 m/min, cutting feed 0.1 mm/rev, and depth of cut 1.25 mm; on the other hand, the worst surface integrity was obtained with cutting speed 125 m/min, cutting feed 0.3 mm/rev, and depth of cut 2.5 mm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arunachalam RM, Manan MA, Spowage AC (2004) Surface integrity when machining age hardened Inconel 718 with coated carbide cutting tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44:1481–1491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chou YK (2002) Surface hardening of AISI 4340 steel by machining: a preliminary investigation. J Mater Process Technol 124:171–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alexander D, Bernardo L, David J, Escobar Maria D (2010) Effect of the variation of cutting parameters in surface integrity in turning processing of an AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel. Technical contribution to the First International Brazilian Conference on Tribology, Brazil 434–446

  4. Che-Haron CH (2001) Tool life and surface integrity in turning titanium alloy. J Mater Process Technol 118:231–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Che-Haron CH, Jawaid A (2005) The effect of machining on surface integrity of titanium alloy Ti–6%Al–4%V. J Mater Process Technol 166:188–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Devillez A, Coz GL, Dominiak S, Dudzinski D (2011) Dry machining of Inconel 718 workpiece surface integrity. J Mater Process Technol 211:1590–1598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sharman ARC, Hughes JI, Ridgway K (2015) The effect of tool nose radius on surface integrity and residual stresses when turning Inconel 718. J Mater Process Technol 216:123–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bordin A, Bruschi S, Ghiotti A (2014) The effect of cutting speed and cutting feed on the surface integrity in dry turning of CoCrMo alloy. 2nd CIRP conference on surface integrity (CSI). Procedia CIRP 13:219–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jacobson M, Dahlman P, Gunnberg F (2002) Cutting speed influence on surface integrity of hard turned bainite steel. J Mater Process Technol 128:318–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rech J, Moisan A (2003) Surface integrity in finish hard turning of case hardened steels. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43(5):543–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Matsumoto Y, Hashimoto F, Lahoti G (1999) Surface integrity generated by precision hard turning. Annals of the CIRP 48(1):59–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. El-Wardany TI, Kishawy HA, Elbestawi MA (2000) Surface integrity of die material in high speed hard machining, part 1: Micrographical analysis. ASME J Manuf Sci And Eng 122:620–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kishawy HA, Elbestawi MA (2001) Tool wear and surface integrity during high-speed turning of hardened steel with polycrystalline cubic boron nitride tools. J Eng Manuf 215:755–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schwach DW, Guo YB (2005) Feasibility of producing optimal surface integrity by process design in hard turning. Mater Sci Eng A 395(1–2):116–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Smith S, Melkote SN, Lara-Curzio E, Watkins TR, Allard L, Riester L (2007) Effect of surface integrity of hard turned AISI 52100 steel on fatigue performance. Mater Sci Eng A 459:337–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shi J, Liu Richard C (2010) Two-step cutting for improving surface integrity and rolling contact fatigue performance of hard machined surfaces. Mater Manuf Process 25:495–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gurbuz H, Kafkas F, Seker U (2012) The effect of tool cutting edge form chip breaker forms on cutting forces and surface roughness in machining AISI 316 L steel. J Life Sci 1(2):173–184

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gurbuz, H (2012) Investigation of the effects of cutting tool geometry and coating types on surface integrity in machining of AISI 316 L steel. Ph.D. Thesis, Gazi Universty, Turkey, 1–179

  19. Astakhov VP, **ao X (2016) The principle of minimum strain energy to fracture of the work material and its application in modern cutting technologies. Chapter 1 in book: Davim JP (ed) Metal Cutting Technologies, Progress and Current Trends; pp. 1–35

  20. Sandvik Coromant, (2010) Sipariş Katoloğu-Sandvik Coromanttan Kesici Takımlar 2009, C-2900:8 AB Sandvik Coromant. İsveç, A123

  21. Sandvik Coromant, (2010) Teknik Kılavuz, C-2900:7 AB Sandvik Coromant, İsveç A101. 103–105, H12

  22. Outeiro JC, Dias AM, Jawahir IS (2006) On the effects of residual stresses induced by coated and uncoated cutting tools with finite edge radii in turning operations. Ann CIRP 55(1):111–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Outeiro JC, Dias AM, Lebrun JL, Astakhov V (2002) Machining residual stresses in AISI 316 L steel and their correlation with the cutting parameters. Mach Sci Technol 6(2):251–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. M’Saoubi R, Outeiro JC, Changeux B, Lebrun JL, Moraäo Dias A (1999) Residual stress analysis in orthogonal machining of standard and resulfurized AISI 316 L steels. J Mater Process Technol 96:225–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Outeiro JC, Pina JC, M’Saoubi R, Pusavec F, Jawahir IS (2008) Analysis of residual stresses induced by dry turning of difficult-to-machine materials. CIRP Ann-Manufac Technol 57:77–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cullity BD (1978) Elements of X-ray diffraction 2nd ed. Addison-Wesley Series in Metallurgy and Materials Canada 86-87:460–461

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chen W (2000) Cutting forces and surface finish when machining medium hardness steel using CBN tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 40:455–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhao J, Ai X, Li Z (2006) Finite element analysis of cutting forces in high speed machining. Mater Sci Forum 532-533:753–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Trent EM (1989) Metal cutting. Butterworths Press, London, pp. 1–171

    Google Scholar 

  30. Çiftçi İ (2006) Machining of austenitic stainless steels using CVD multi-layer coated cemented carbide tools. Tribol Int 39:565–569

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Suresh R, Basavarajappa S, Samuel GL (2012) Some studies on hard turning of AISI 4340 steel using multilayer coated carbide tool. Measurement 45:1872–1884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Shoba C, Ramanaiah N, Nageswara Rao D (2015) Effect of reinforcement on the cutting forces while machining metal matrix compositese an experimental approach. Engineering science and technology an. Int J 18:658–663

    Google Scholar 

  33. Marinov VR (2001) Hybrid analytical-numerical solution for the shear angle in orthogonal metal cutting—part II: experimental verification. Int J Mech Sci 43:415–426

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Shih AJ (1996) Finite element analysis of the rake angle effects in orthogonal cutting. Int J Mech Sci 38(1):1–17

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Moufki A, Molinari A, Dudzinski D (1998) Modelling of orthogonal cutting with a temperature dependent friction law. J Mech Phys Solids 46:2103–2138

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Saglam H, Unsacar F, Yaldiz S (2006) Investigation of the effect of rake angle and approaching angle on main cutting force and tool tip temperature. Int J Mach Tools Manufac 46:132–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Shaw MC (1989) Metal cutting principles. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  38. De Garmo EP, Black JT, Kohser RA (1997) Materials and processes in manufacturing. Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey, pp. 214–652

    Google Scholar 

  39. Boothroyd G (1989) Fundamentals of metal machining and machine tools, Second edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 166–172

    Google Scholar 

  40. Munoz–Escalona P, Cassier Z (1998) Influence of the critical cutting speed on the surface finish of turned steel. Wear 218:103–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Thamizhmanii S, Kamarudin KE, Rahim A, Saparudin A, Hassan S (2007) Tool wear and surface roughness in turning AISI 8620 using coated ceramic tool. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, Vol II WCE, London, pp. 1157–1161

    Google Scholar 

  42. Gupta M, Kumar S (2015) Investigation of surface roughness and MRR for turning of UD-GFRP using PCA and Taguchi method. Eng Sci Technol Int J 18:70–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Suresh R, Basavarajappa S (2014) Effect of process parameters on tool wear and surface roughness during turning oj hardened steel with coated ceramic tool. Procedia Mater Sci 5:1450–1459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Nasr MNA, Ng EG, Elbestawia MA (2008) A modified time-efficient FE approach for predicting machining-induced residual stresses. Finite Elem Anal Des 44:149–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Valiorgue F, Rech J, Hamdi H, Gilles P, Bergheau JM (2007) A new approach for the modelling of residual stresses induced by turning of 316L. J Mater Process Technol 191:270–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ee KC, Dillon OW, Jawahir IS (2005) Finite element modeling of residual stresses in machining induced by cutting using a tool with finite edge radius. Int J Mech Sci 47:1611–1628

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Liang SY, Su JC (2007) Residual stress modeling in orthogonal machining. Annals of the CIRP 56(1):65–68

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  48. Outeiro JC, Umbrello D, M’Saoubi R (2006) Experimental and numerical modelling of the residual stresses induced in orthogonal cutting of AISI 316 L steel. Int J Mach Tools Manufac 46(14):1786–1794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Ulutan D, Alaca BE, Lazoglu I (2007) Analytical modelling of residual stresses in machining. J Mater Process Technol 183:77–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Mohammadpour M, Razfar MR, Saffar JR (2010) Numerical investigating the effect of machining parameters on residual stresses in orthogonal cutting. Simul Model Pract Theory 18:378–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Maranhão C, Davim PJ (2010) Finite element modelling of machining of AISI 316 steel: numerical simulation and experimental validation. Simul Model Pract Theory 18:139–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Kishawy HEA, (1998) Chip formation and surface integrity in high speed machining of hardened steel. Doctor of Philosophy, Mc Master University; Canada, 87–89

  53. Liu CR, Barash MM (1982) Variables governing patterns of mechanical residual stress in a machined surface. J Eng Ind Trans ASME 104(3):257–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Sandvik Coromant (1994) Modern metal cutting—a practical handbook . Sandvik Coromant, Sweden, pp. I–IIIEnglish Edition

    Google Scholar 

  55. Sharman ARC, Hughes JI, Ridgway K (2006) An analysis of the residual stresses generated in Inconel 718 when turning. J Mater Process Technol 173:359–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Dahlman P, Gunnberg F, Jacobson M (2004) The influence of rake angle, cutting feed and cutting depth on residual stresses in hard turning. J Mater Process Technol 147:181–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Sasahara H, Obikawa T, Shirakashi T (2004) Prediction model of surface residual stress within a machined surface by combining two orthogonal plane models. Int J Mach Tools Manufac 44:815–822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Gunnberg F, Escursell M, Jacobson M (2006) The influence of cutting parameters on residual stresses and surface topography during hard turning of 18MnCr5 case carburised steel. J Mater Process Technol 174:82–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Günay M, Korkut İ, Aslan E, Şeker U (2005) Experimental investigation of the effect of cutting tool rake angle on main cutting force. J Mater Process Technol 166:44–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Javidi A, Rieger U, Eichlseder W (2008) The effect of machining on the surface integrity and fatigue life (technical note). Int J Fatigue 30:2050–2055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Ezugwu EO, Wang ZM, Okeke CI (1999) Tool life and surface integrity when machining Inconel 718 with PVD and CVD coated tools. Tribol Trans 42(2):353–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Sharman ARC, Hughes JI, Ridgway K (2004) Workpiece surface integrity and tool life issues when turning Inconel 718 nickel based superalloy. Mach Sci Technol 8(3):399–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Ulutan D, Ozel T (2011) Machining induced surface integrity in titanium and nickel alloys: a review. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51:250–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Bosheh SS, Mativenga PT (2006) White layer formation in hard turning of H13 tool steel at high cutting speeds using CBN tooling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:225–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Pawade RS, Joshi SS, Brahmankar PK (2008) Effect of machining parameters and cutting edge geometry on surface integrity of high-speed turned Inconel 718. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48:15–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Coelho RT, Silva LR, Braghini A Jr, Bezerra AA (2004) Some effects of cutting edge preparation and geometric modifications when turning Inconel 718 at high cutting speeds. J Mater Process Technol 148(1):147–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Umbrello D, Filice L (2009) Improving surface integrity in orthogonal machining of hardened AISI 52100 steel by modeling white and dark layers formation. CIRP Ann Manufact Technol 58:73–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Technology, Batman University, Batman, Turkey

    Hüseyin Gürbüz

  2. Faculty of Technology, Teknikokullar, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey

    Ulvi Şeker & Fırat Kafkas

Authors
  1. Hüseyin Gürbüz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ulvi Şeker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fırat Kafkas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hüseyin Gürbüz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gürbüz, H., Şeker, U. & Kafkas, F. Investigation of effects of cutting insert rake face forms on surface integrity. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90, 3507–3522 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9652-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9652-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation