SpringerLink
Log in

Kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty better reproduces normal gait than mechanical alignment

  • KNEE
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

Kinematic alignment technique for TKA aims to restore the individual knee anatomy and ligament tension, to restore native knee kinematics. The aim of this study was to compare parameters of kinematics during gait (knee flexion–extension, adduction–abduction, internal–external tibial rotation and walking speed) of TKA patients operated by either kinematic alignment or mechanical alignment technique with a group of healthy controls. The hypothesis was that the kinematic parameters of kinematically aligned TKAs would more closely resemble that of healthy controls than mechanically aligned TKAs.

Methods

This was a retrospective case–control study. Eighteen kinematically aligned TKAs were matched by gender, age, operating surgeon and prosthesis to 18 mechanically aligned TKAs. Post-operative 3D knee kinematics analysis, performed with an optoelectronic knee assessment device (KneeKG®), was compared between mechanical alignment TKA patients, kinematic alignment TKA patients and healthy controls. Radiographic measures and clinical scores were also compared between the two TKA groups.

Results

The kinematic alignment group showed no significant knee kinematic differences compared to healthy knees in sagittal plane range of motion, maximum flexion, abduction–adduction curves or knee external tibial rotation. Conversely, the mechanical alignment group displayed several significant knee kinematic differences to the healthy group: less sagittal plane range of motion (49.1° vs. 54.0°, p = 0.020), decreased maximum flexion (52.3° vs. 57.5°, p = 0.002), increased adduction angle (2.0–7.5° vs. − 2.8–3.0°, p < 0.05), and increased external tibial rotation (by a mean of 2.3 ± 0.7°, p < 0.001). The post-operative KOOS score was significantly higher in the kinematic alignment group compared to the mechanical alignment group (74.2 vs. 60.7, p = 0.034).

Conclusions

The knee kinematics of patients with kinematically aligned TKAs more closely resembled that of normal healthy controls than that of patients with mechanically aligned TKAs. This may be the result of a better restoration of the individual’s knee anatomy and ligament tension. A return to normal gait parameters post-TKA will lead to improved clinical outcomes and greater patient satisfaction.

Level of evidence

III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Almaawi AM, Hutt JRB, Masse V, Lavigne M, Vendittoli P-A (2017) The impact of mechanical and restricted kinematic alignment on knee anatomy in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 32:2133–2140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Andriacchi TP, Stanwyck TS, Galante JO (1986) Knee biomechanics and total knee replacement. J Arthroplasty 1:211–219

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Arnold JB, Mackintosh S, Olds TS, Jones S, Thewlis D (2015) Improvements in knee biomechanics during walking are associated with increased physical activity after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 33:1818–1825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KDJ (2010) Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:57–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Butler RJ, Barrios JA, Royer T, Davis IS (2011) Frontal-plane gait mechanics in people with medial knee osteoarthritis are different from those in people with lateral knee osteoarthritis. Phys Ther 91:1235–1243

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Calliess T, Bauer K, Stukenborg-Colsman C, Windhagen H, Budde S, Ettinger M (2017) PSI kinematic versus non-PSI mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:1743–1748

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Clément J, de Guise JA, Fuentes A, Hagemeister N (2018) Comparison of soft tissue artifact and its effects on knee kinematics between non-obese and obese subjects performing a squatting activity recorded using an exoskeleton. Gait Posture 91:197–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Clément J, Toliopoulos P, Hagemeister N, Desmeules F, Fuentes A, Vendittoli P-A (2018) Healthy 3D knee kinematics during gait: differences between women and men, and correlation with X-ray alignment. Gait Posture 64:198–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Collins M, Lavigne M, Girard J, Vendittoli PA (2012) Joint perception after hip or knee replacement surgery. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98:275–280

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Courtney PM, Lee GC (2017) Early outcomes of kinematic alignment in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of the literature. J Arthroplasty 32:2028–2032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dossett HG, Estrada NA, Swartz GJ, LeFevre GW, Kwasman BG (2014) A randomised controlled trial of kinematically and mechanically aligned total knee replacements: two-year clinical results. Bone Jt J 96-B:907–913

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gu Y, Roth JD, Howell SM, Hull ML (2014) How frequently do four methods for mechanically aligning a total knee arthroplasty cause collateral ligament imbalance and change alignment from normal in white patients? AAOS exhibit selection. J Bone Jt Surg Am 96:e101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hagemeister N, Parent G, Van de Putte M, St-Onge N, Duval N, de Guise J (2005) A reproducible method for studying three-dimensional knee kinematics. J Biomech 38:1926–1931

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Howell SM, Howell SJ, Hull ML (2010) Assessment of the radii of the medial and lateral femoral condyles in varus and valgus knees with osteoarthritis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 92:98–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hutt JRB, LeBlanc MA, Massé V, Lavigne M, Vendittoli PA (2016) Kinematic TKA using navigation: surgical technique and initial results. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 102:99–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Johnson TSLM, Yao JQ, Gilbertson LN (2001) The effect of displacement control input parameters on tibiofemoral prosthetic knee wear. Wear 250:222–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kirschberg J, Goralski S, Layher F, Sander K, Matziolis G (2018) Normalized gait analysis parameters are closely related to patient-reported outcome measures after total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 138:711–717

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Labbe DR, Hagemeister N, Tremblay M, de Guise J (2008) Reliability of a method for analyzing three-dimensional knee kinematics during gait. Gait Posture 28:170–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee YS, Howell SM, Won YY, Lee OS, Lee SH, Vahedi H et al (2017) Kinematic alignment is a possible alternative to mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4558-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Li G, Park SE, DeFrate LE, Schutzer ME, Ji L, Gill TJ et al (2005) The cartilage thickness distribution in the tibiofemoral joint and its correlation with cartilage-to-cartilage contact. Clin Biomech (Bristol Avon) 20:736–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Li Y, Wang S, Wang Y, Yang M (2018) Does kinematic alignment improve short-term functional outcomes after total knee arthroplasty compared with mechanical alignment? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Knee Surg 31:78–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lustig S, Magnussen RA, Cheze L, Neyret P (2012) The KneeKG system: a review of the literature. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:633–638

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Matsumoto T, Takayama K, Ishida K, Hayashi S, Hashimoto S, Kuroda R (2017) Radiological and clinical comparison of kinematically versus mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty. Bone Jt J 99-B:640–646

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. McClelland JA, Webster KE, Feller JA (2007) Gait analysis of patients following total knee replacement: a systematic review. Knee 14:253–263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. McNair PJ, Boocock MG, Dominick ND, Kelly RJ, Farrington BJ, Young SW (2017) A comparison of walking gait following mechanical and kinematic alignment in total knee joint replacement. J Arthroplasty. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.09.031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nam D, Lin KM, Howell SM, Hull ML (2014) Femoral bone and cartilage wear is predictable at 0 degrees and 90 degrees in the osteoarthritic knee treated with total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:2975–2981

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nam D, Nunley RM, Barrack RL (2014) Patient dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: a growing concern? Bone Jt J 96-B:96–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Niki Y, Nagura T, Nagai K, Kobayashi S, Harato K (2018) Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty reduces knee adduction moment more than mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:1629–1635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Riviere C, Ollivier M, Girerd D, Argenson JN, Parratte S (2017) Does standing limb alignment after total knee arthroplasty predict dynamic alignment and knee loading during gait? Knee 24:627–633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sati M, de Guise J, Larouche S, Drouin G (1996) Improving in vivo knee kinematic measurements: application to prosthetic ligament analysis. Knee 3:179–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Takahashi T, Ansari J, Pandit HG (2018) Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty or mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1632378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Turcot K, Sagawa Y Jr, Fritschy D, Hoffmeyer P, Suva D, Armand S (2013) How gait and clinical outcomes contribute to patients’ satisfaction three months following a total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 28:1297–1300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Vendittoli PA, Blakeney W (2017) Redefining knee replacement. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 103:977–979

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Waterson HB, Clement ND, Eyres KS, Mandalia VI, Toms AD (2016) The early outcome of kinematic versus mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised control trial. Bone Jt J 98-B:1360–1368

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Yoon JR, Han SB, Jee MK, Shin YS (2017) Comparison of kinematic and mechanical alignment techniques in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 96:e8157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Young SW, Walker ML, Bayan A, Briant-Evans T, Pavlou P, Farrington B (2017) The Chitranjan S. Ranawat Award: no difference in 2-year functional outcomes using kinematic versus mechanical alignment in TKA: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 475:9–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Research funds were provided by Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Fundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Université de Montréal, Hôpital Maisonneuve Rosemont, 5415, Boulevard de l’Assomption, Montreal, QC, H1T 2M4, Canada

    William Blakeney & Pascal-André Vendittoli

  2. Centre de recherche de l’Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont-Orthopédie, 5415, Boulevard de l’Assomption, Montreal, QC, H1T 2M4, Canada

    Julien Clément, François Desmeules & Pascal-André Vendittoli

  3. School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montreal, C.P. 6128, succursale Centre-ville, Montreal, QC, H3C 3J7, Canada

    François Desmeules

  4. Laboratoire de recherche en imagerie et orthopédie, Centre de recherche du CHUM, Tour Viger 900, rue St-Denis, local R11.322, Montreal, QC, H2X 0A9, Canada

    Nicola Hagemeister

  5. École de technologie supérieure, 1100 Notre-Dame Ouest, Montreal, H3C1K3, Canada

    Nicola Hagemeister

  6. The MSK Lab, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Campus, Hammersmith, London, W6 8RP, UK

    Charles Rivière

Authors
  1. William Blakeney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Julien Clément
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. François Desmeules
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nicola Hagemeister
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Charles Rivière
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Pascal-André Vendittoli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pascal-André Vendittoli.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the author have proprietary, financial, professional or other personal interest of any nature or kind of any product, service and/or company that could be construed as influencing the position presented in the manuscript.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was obtained from the research and ethics committee (CIUSSS de l’Est-de-l’Île-de-Montréal, Project number 2011-462), and all patients gave informed consent.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Blakeney, W., Clément, J., Desmeules, F. et al. Kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty better reproduces normal gait than mechanical alignment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27, 1410–1417 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5174-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5174-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation