Abstract
Purpose
Evaluate allograft tissue commonly used in soft tissue reconstruction to determine whether stiffness and strength were significantly altered after grafts were treated with different sterilization methods. Unprocessed, irradiated, and grafts treated with supercritical CO2 were compared.
Methods
Thirty-eight anterior or posterior tibialis tendons were obtained from a tissue bank (Allograft Innovations, Gainesville, FL). Group I was unprocessed, group II was sterilized with gamma irradiation (20–28 kGy), and group III was sterilized with supercritical CO2. The grafts were pretensioned to 89 N for 300 s. Specimens were then loaded from 50 to 300 N at 0.5 Hz for 250 cycles before being loaded to failure at 50 mm/min. Dependent variables were compared between sterilization groups with one-way ANOVA (P < 0.05) and equivalence trial.
Results
There was no significant difference in load to failure or failure stress among groups I, II, and III. Group III resulted in 27–36 % lower stiffness than group I and II. This difference was significant at 1, 10, 50, 100, and 250 cycles. There was no significant difference in stiffness between group I and group II.
Conclusion
The two sterilization methods tested in this study do not affect allograft strength. The supercritical CO2 sterilization method resulted in significantly lower stiffness than unprocessed and irradiated allografts. However, the stiffness and strength of all groups tested were greater than that of published values of the native intact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). This study provides previously unpublished mechanical test data on a new sterilization technique that will assist surgeons to decide which allograft to use in ACL reconstruction surgery.
Level of evidence
III.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00167-014-3221-0/MediaObjects/167_2014_3221_Fig1_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00167-014-3221-0/MediaObjects/167_2014_3221_Fig2_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00167-014-3221-0/MediaObjects/167_2014_3221_Fig3_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00167-014-3221-0/MediaObjects/167_2014_3221_Fig4_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barrera Oro F, Sikka RS, Wolters B, Graver R, Boyd JL, Nelson B, Swiontkowski MF (2011) Autograft versus allograft: an economic cost comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 27(9):1219–1225
Bhatia S, Bell R, Frank RM, Rodeo SA, Bach BR Jr, Cole BJ, Chubinskaya S, Wang VM, Verma NN (2012) Bony incorporation of soft tissue anterior cruciate ligament grafts in an animal model: autograft versus allograft with low-dose gamma irradiation. Am J Sports Med 40(8):1789–1798
Chandrashekar N, Mansouri H, Slauterbeck J, Hashemi J (2006) Sex-based differences in the tensile properties of the human anterior cruciate ligament. J Biomech 39(16):2943–2950
Conrad BP, Rappe M, Horodyski M, Farmer KW, Indelicato PA (2013) The effect of sterilization on mechanical properties of soft tissue allografts. Cell Tissue Bank 14(3):359–366
Fideler BM, Vangsness CT Jr, Moore T, Li Z, Rasheed S (1994) Effects of gamma irradiation on the human immunodeficiency virus. A study in frozen human bone-patellar ligament-bone grafts obtained from infected cadavera. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76(7):1032–1035
Greis PE, Koch BS, Adams B (2012) Tibialis anterior or posterior allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction versus hamstring autograft reconstruction: an economic analysis in a hospital-based outpatient setting. Arthroscopy 28(11):1695–1701
Guo L, Yang L, Duan XJ, He R, Chen GX, Wang FY, Zhang Y (2012) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone graft: comparison of autograft, fresh-frozen allograft, and gamma-irradiated allograft. Arthroscopy 28(2):211–217
Harrington IJ (1976) A bioengineering analysis of force actions at the knee in normal and pathological gait. Biomed Eng 11(5):167–172
Harris AH, Fernandes-Taylor S, Giori N (2012) “Not statistically different” does not necessarily mean “the same”: the important but underappreciated distinction between difference and equivalence studies. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94(5):e29
Hernigou P, Gras G, Marinello G, Dormont D (2000) Influence of irradiation on the risk of transmission of HIV in bone grafts obtained from appropriately screened donors and followed by radiation sterilization. Cell Tissue Bank 1(4):279–289
Hoburg AT, Keshlaf S, Schmidt T, Smith M, Gohs U, Perka C, Pruss A, Scheffler S (2010) Effect of electron beam irradiation on biomechanical properties of patellar tendon allografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 38(6):1134–1140
Hu J, Qu J, Xu D, Zhou J, Lu H (2013) Allograft versus autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an up-to-date meta-analysis of prospective studies. Int Orthop 37(2):311–320
Huang Q, Ingham E, Rooney P, Kearney JN (2013) Production of a sterilised decellularised tendon allograft for clinical use. Cell Tissue Bank 14(4):645–654
Jackson DW, Grood ES, Goldstein JD, Rosen MA, Kurzweil PR, Cummings JF, Simon TM (1993) A comparison of patellar tendon autograft and allograft used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the goat model. Am J Sports Med 21(2):176–185
Krych AJ, Jackson JD, Hoskin TL, Dahm DL (2008) A meta-analysis of patellar tendon autograft versus patellar tendon allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 24(3):292–298
Morrison JB (1970) The mechanics of the knee joint in relation to normal walking. J Biomech 3(1):51–61
Noyes FR, Grood ES (1976) The strength of the anterior cruciate ligament in humans and rhesus monkeys. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58(8):1074–1082
Schimizzi A, Wedemeyer M, Odell T, Thomas W, Mahar AT, Pedowitz R (2007) Effects of a novel sterilization process on soft tissue mechanical properties for anterior cruciate ligament allografts. Am J Sports Med 35(4):612–616
Schmidt T, Hoburg A, Broziat C, Smith MD, Gohs U, Pruss A, Scheffler S (2012) Sterilization with electron beam irradiation influences the biomechanical properties and the early remodeling of tendon allografts for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Cell Tissue Bank 13(3):387–400
Seto AU, Culp BM, Gatt CJ Jr, Dunn M (2013) Radioprotection provides functional mechanics but delays healing of irradiated tendon allografts after ACL reconstruction in sheep. Cell Tissue Bank 14(4):655–665
Shelburne KB, Torry MR, Pandy MG (2005) Muscle, ligament, and joint-contact forces at the knee during walking. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37(11):1948–1956
Sun K, Zhang J, Wang Y, **a C, Zhang C, Yu T, Tian S (2011) Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with at least 2.5 years’ follow-up comparing hamstring tendon autograft and irradiated allograft. Arthroscopy 27(9):1195–1202
White A, Burns D, Christensen TW (2006) Effective terminal sterilization using supercritical carbon dioxide. J Biotechnol 123(4):504–515
Woo SL, Hollis JM, Adams DJ, Lyon RM, Takai S (1991) Tensile properties of the human femur-anterior cruciate ligament-tibia complex. The effects of specimen age and orientation. Am J Sports Med 19(3):217–225
Yanke AB, Bell R, Lee A, Kang RW, Mather RC III, Shewman EF, Wang VM, Bach BR Jr (2013) The biomechanical effects of 1.0 to 1.2 Mrad of gamma irradiation on human bone-patellar tendon-bone allografts. Am J Sports Med 41(4):835–840
Zhou M, Zhang N, Liu X, Li Y, Zhang Y, Wang X, Li B (2014) Tendon allograft sterilized by peracetic acid/ethanol combined with gamma irradiation. J Orthop Sci. doi:10.1007/s00776-014-0556-9
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by Stryker Orthopaedics (Mahwah, NJ, USA).
Conflict of interest
Monica Hawkins is an employee of Stryker Orthopaedics and owns stock in the company. This study was funded by Stryker Orthopaedics.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baldini, T., Caperton, K., Hawkins, M. et al. Effect of a novel sterilization method on biomechanical properties of soft tissue allografts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24, 3971–3975 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3221-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3221-0