Log in

Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) for chondral defects in the patellofemoral joint

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

Both autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) and tibial tubercle transfer (TTT) have been used to treat chondral defects in the patellofemoral joint resulting in clinical improvement. Our study investigates the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) appearance of the matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) graft at 5-year follow-up to determine if it provides a durable treatment option in patients with an average age of 42 (standard deviation 11.6).

Methods

Twenty-three patients were available for follow-up. Nine patients required realignment of the extensor mechanism with lateral release and TTT. The MRI magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) scoring system was used to assess the graft status. Clinical outcomes were assessed at these time periods.

Results

The mean weighted MOCART composite score improved from 2.87 at 3 months to 3.39 at 5 years, indicating an intact appearance in most grafts. Graft height measured >50 % of the adjacent native cartilage in 82 % of patients. Clinical improvement assessed by the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, SF-36 (PCS) and the 6-minute walk test was demonstrated between pre-operative scores and final 5-year follow-up. 91 % of patients would undergo MACI again. Correlation between MOCART and clinical scores were low in MACI to the patellofemoral joint. No significant difference was found in outcome between those that required realignment surgery compared with those that did not.

Conclusion

Patellofemoral MACI provides a durable graft on MRI assessment at 5 years with resultant clinical improvement. Further work is needed to determine which defect locations may benefit most from this procedure.

Level of evidence

IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bachmann G, Basad E, Rauber K, Damian M, Rau W (1999) Degenerative joint disease on MRI and physical activity: a clinical study of the knee joint in 320 patients. Eur Radiol 9:145–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bartlett W, Gooding C, Carrington R, Briggs T, Skinner J, Bentley G (2005) The role of the SF-36 Health Survey in autologous chondrocyte implantation. Knee 12:281–285

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Blackman A, Smith M, Flanigan D, Matava M, Wright R, Brophy R (2013) Correlation between magnetic resonance imaging and clinical outcomes after cartilage repair surgery in the knee: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 41:1426–1434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brittberg M, Lindahl A, Nilsson A, Ohlsson C, Isaksson O, Peterson L (1994) Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte implantation. N Engl J Med 331:889–895

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Brittberg M, Winalski C (2003) Evaluation of cartilage injuries and repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85(Supp 3):58–69

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cherubino P, Grassi F, Bulgheroni P, Ronga M (2003) Autologous chondrocyte implantation using a bilayer collagen membrane: a preliminary report. J Orthop Surg 11:10–15

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Drawer S, Fuller C (2001) Propensity for osteoarthritis and lower limb joint pain in retired professional soccer players. Br J Sports Med 35:402–408

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Ebert J, Robertson W, Lloyd D, Zheng M, Wood D, Ackland T (2008) Traditional vs. accelerated approaches to post-operative rehabilitation following matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI): comparison of clinical, biomechanical and radiographic outcomes. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 16:1131–1140

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ebert J, Robertson W, Woodhouse J, Fallon M, Zheng M, Ackland T, Wood D (2011) Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging-based outcomes to 5 years after matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation to address articular cartilage defects in the knee. Am J Sports Med 39:753–763

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Farr J (2007) Autologous chondrocyte implantation improves patellofemoral cartilage treatment outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 463:187–194

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Filardo G, Kon E, Di Martino A, Iacono F, Marcacci M (2011) Arthroscopic second-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation: a prospective 7-year follow-up study. Am J Sports Med 39:2153–2160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Flanigan D, Harris J, Trinh T, Siston R, Brophy R (2010) Prevalence of chondral defects in athletes’ knees: a systematic review. Med Sci Sports Exerc 42:1795–1801

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fulkerson J (1994) Patellofemoral pain disorders: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2:124–132

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fulkerson J (2004) Disorders of the patellofemoral joints: principles and practice. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fulkerson J, Becker G, Meaney J, Miranda M, Folcik M (1990) Anteromedial tibial tubercle transfer without bone graft. Am J Sports Med 18:490–497

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Genovese E, Ronga M, Angeretti M, Novario R, Leonardi A, Albrizio M, Callegari L, Fugazzola C (2011) Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation of the knee: mid-term and long-term follow-up by MR arthrography. Skeletal Radiol 40:47–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gigante A, Enea D, Greco F, Bait C, Denti M, Schonhuber H, Volpi P (2009) Distal realignment and patellar autologous chondrocyte implantation: mid-term results in a selected population. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:2–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gobbi A, Kon E, Berruto M, Filardo G, Delcogliano M, Boldrini L, Bathan L, Marcacci M (2009) Patellofemoral full-thickness chondral defects treated with second-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation: results at 5 years’ follow-up. Am J Sports Med 37:1083–1092

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Henderson I, Lavigne P (2006) Periosteal autologous chondrocyte implantation for patellar chondral defect in patients with normal and abnormal patellar tracking. Knee 13:274–279

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Henderson I, Francisco R (2005) Treatment outcome of extensor realignment for patellofemoral dysfunction. Knee 12:323–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaplan L, Schuerhoff M, Selesnick H, Thorpe M, Uribe J (2005) MRI of the knee in asymptomatic professional basketball players. Arthroscopy 21:557–561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kon E, Filardo G, Condello V, Collarile M, Di Martino A, Zorzi C, Marcacci M (2011) Second-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation: results in patients older than 40 years. Am J Sports Med 39:1668–1675

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Macmull S, Jaiswal P, Bentley G, Skinner J, Carrington R, Briggs T (2012) The role of autologous chondrocyte implantation in the treatment of symptomatic chondromalacia patella. Int Orthop 36:1371–1377

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Mandelbaum B, Browne J, Fu F, Micheli L, Moseley J, Erggelet C, Anderson A (2007) Treatment outcomes of autologous chondrocyte implantation for full-thickness articular cartilage defects of the trochlear. Am J Sports Med 35:915–921

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Marlovits S, Aldrian S, Wondrasch B, Zak L, Albrecht C, Welsch G, Trattnig S (2012) Clinical and radiological outcomes 5 years after matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation in patients with symptomatic, traumatic chondral defects. Am J Sports Med 40:2273–2280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Marlovits S, Singer P, Zeller P, Mandl L, Haller J, Trattnig S (2006) Magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) for the evaluation of autologous transplantation: determination of interobserver variability and correlation to clinical outcome after 2 years. Eur J Radiol 57:16–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Marlovits S, Streissnig G, Resinger C, Aldrian S, Vecsei V, Imhof H, Trattnig S (2004) Definition of pertinent parameters for the evaluation of articular cartilage repair tissue with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol 52:310–319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Minas T, Bryant T (2005) The role of autologous chondrocyte implantation in the patellofemoral joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res 436:30–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Minas T, Peterson L (1997) Advanced techniques in autologous chondrocyte transplantation. Oper Tech Orthop 7:323–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Minas T, Peterson L (1997) Autologous chondrocyte implantation. Oper Tech Orthop 7:323–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. NHMRC levels of evidence and grades for recommendations for developers of guidelines. Australian Government National Health and Medical Research Council; December 2009. http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/file/guidelines/evidence_statement_form.pdf

  32. Niemeyer P, Kostler W, Salzmann G, Lenz P, Kreuz P, Sudkamp N (2010) Autologous chondrocyte implantation for treatment of focal cartilage defects in patients age 40 years and older. Am J Sports Med 38:2410–2416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pascual-Garrido C, Slabaugh M, L’Heureux D, Friel N, Cole B (2009) Recommendations and treatment outcomes for patellofemoral articular cartilage defects with autologous chondrocyte implantation: prospective evaluation at average 4-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 37(Suppl 1):33S–41S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pidoriano A, Weinstein R, Buuck D, Fulkerson J (1997) Correlation of patellar articular lesions with results from anteromedial tibial tubercle transfer. Am J Sports Med 25:533–537

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Powell J, Kavanagh T, Kennedy D, Marans H, Wright T (1988) Intra-articular knee injuries in racquet sports. Surg Endosc 2:39–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Robertson W, Fick D, Wood D, Linklater J, Zheng M, Ackland T (2007) MRI and clinical evaluation of collagen-covered autologous chondrocyte implantation (CACI) at two years. Knee 14:117–127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Roos E, Roos H, Lohmander L, Ekdahl C, Beynnon B (1998) Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Phys Ther 28:88–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Rosenberger R, Gomoll A, Bryant T, Minas T (2008) Repair of large chondral defects of the knee with autologous chondrocyte implantation in patients 45 years and older. Am J Sports Med 36:2336–2344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Trattnig S, Pinker K, Krestan C, Plank C, Millington S, Marlovits S (2006) Matrix-based autologous chondrocyte implantation for cartilage repair with Hyalograft C: two-year follow-up by magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol 57:9–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Trinh T, Harris J, Siston R, Flanigan D (2013) Improved outcomes with combined autologous chondrocyte implantation and patellofemoral osteotomy versus isolated autologous chondrocyte implantation. Arthroscopy 29:566–574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Vanlauwe J, Claes T, Van Assche D, Bellemans J, Luyten F (2012) Characterized chondrocyte implantation in the patellofemoral joint: an up to 4-year follow—up prospective cohort of 38 patients. Am J Sports Med 40:1799–1807

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Vasiliadis H, Lindahl A, Georgoulis A, Peterson L (2011) Malalignment and cartilage lesions in the patellofemoral joint treated with autologous chondrocyte implantation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:452–457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Vasiliadis H, Wasiak J (2010) Autologous chondrocyte implantation for full thickness articular cartilage defects of the knee. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10:CD003323

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ventura A, Memeo A, Borgo E, Terzaghi C, Legnani C, Albisetti W (2012) Repair of osteochondral lesions in the knee by chondrocyte implantation using the MACI technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:121–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Welsch G, Mamisch T, Zak L, Blanke M, Olk A, Marlovits S, Trattnig S (2010) Evaluation of cartilage repair tissue after matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation using a hyaluronic-based or a collagen based scaffold with morphological MOCART scoring and biochemical T2 map**: preliminary results. Am J Sports Med 38:934–942

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Zheng MH, Willers C, Kirilak L, Yates P, Xu J, Wood D, Shimmin A (2007) Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI): biological and histological assessment. Tissue Eng 4:737–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

No author had conflict of interest to declare. No funding was provided for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Meyerkort.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 443 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meyerkort, D., Ebert, J.R., Ackland, T.R. et al. Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) for chondral defects in the patellofemoral joint. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22, 2522–2530 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3046-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3046-x

Keywords

Navigation