Abstract
This theoretical paper elucidates the nature of educational technology and, in the process, sheds light on a number of phenomena in educational systems, from the no-significant-difference phenomenon to the singular lack of replication in studies of educational technologies. Its central thesis is that we are not just users of technologies but coparticipants in them. Our participant roles may range from pressing power switches to designing digital learning systems to performing calculations in our heads. Some technologies may demand our participation only to enact fixed, predesigned orchestrations correctly. Other technologies leave gaps that we can or must fill with novel orchestrations, which we may perform more or less well. Most are a mix of the two, and the mix varies according to context, participant, and use. This participative orchestration is highly distributed: in educational systems, coparticipants include the learner, the teacher, and many others, from textbook authors to LMS programmers, as well as the tools and methods they use and create. From this perspective, all learners and teachers are educational technologists. The technologies of education are seen to be deeply, fundamentally, and irreducibly human, complex, situated and social in their constitution, their form, and their purpose, and as ungeneralizable in their effects as the choice of paintbrush is to the production of great art.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrews TM, Leonard MJ, Colgrove CA, Kalinowski ST (2011) Active learning not associated with student learning in a random sample of college biology courses. CBE-Life Sci Educ 10(4):394–405. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.11-07-0061
Aristotle, Whalley G (1997) Aristotle’s Poetics: translated and with a commentary by George Whalley (Whalley G, Trans.). McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal
Arthur WB (2009) The nature of technology: what it is and how it evolves, Kindle. Free Press, New York
Baldwin J, Brand S (1978) Soft-tech. Penguin, New York
Bijker WE, Hughes TP, Pinch TJ (eds) (1989) The social construction of technological systems. MIT Press, Cambridge
Bloom BS (1984) The 2 sigma problem: the search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educ Res 13(6):4–16. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1175554
Bloom H (2000) Global brain: the evolution of mass mind. Wiley, Toronto
Boden M (1995) Creativity and unpredictability. Stanford Human Revi 4(2):123–139. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=212171&CFID=34973622&CFTOKEN=46572978
Boyd GM (1996) Emancipative educational technology. Canadian J Educ Commun 25:179–186
Brand S (1997) How buildings learn. Phoenix Illustrated, London
Brand S (2008) The clock of the long now: time and responsibility. Basic Books, New York
Changizi M (2013) Harnessed: how language and music mimicked nature and transformed ape to man. BenBella Books, Dallas
Chen P-SD, Lambert AD, Guidry KR (2010) Engaging online learners: the impact of Web-based learning technology on college student engagement. Comput Educ 54(4):1222–1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.008
Clark A (2008) Supersizing the mind: embodiment, action, and cognitive extension: embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Clark RC, Mayer RE (2011) e-Learning and the science of instruction: proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning, 3rd edn. Pfeifer, San Francisco
Coffield F, Moseley DVM, Ecclestone K, Hall E (2004) Learning styles and pedagogy: a systematic and critical review. Learning and Skills Research Council, London
Cooley M (1987) Architect or bee? The human price of technology. The Hogarth Press, London
Daniel J, Kanwar A, Uvalić-Trumbić S (2009) Breaking higher education’s iron triangle: access, cost, and quality. Change Mag Higher Learn 41(2):30–35
Davis B, Sumara DJ (2006) Complexity and education: inquiries into learning, teaching, and research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah
De Bruyckere P, Kirschner PA, Hulshof CD (2015) Urban myths about learning and education. Academic Press, London
Derribo MH, Howard K (2007) Advice about the use of learning styles: a major myth in education. J Coll Reading Learn 37:2
Dewey J (1916) Democracy and education. Macmillan, New York. http://www.ilt.columbia.edu/projects/digitexts/dewey/d_e/contents.html. Accessed 21 May 2001
Dron J (2006) Any color you like, as long as it’s Blackboard®. In: Proceedings from E-Learn 2006, Hawaii
Dron J (2007) Control and constraint in e-learning: choosing when to choose. Idea Group International, Hershey. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-390-6
Dron J (2013) Soft is hard and hard is easy: learning technologies and social media. Form@re 13(1):32–43. Retrieved from http://www.fupress.net/index.php/formare/article/view/12613
Dron J, Anderson T (2014) Teaching crowds: learning & social media. AU Press, Athabasca. Retrieved from http://teachingcrowds.ca
Dubos R (1969) American Academy of Allergy 25th anniversary series: the spaceship earth. J Allergy 44(1):1–9
Franklin UM (1999) The real world of technology, kindle. House of Anansi Press, Concord
Franklin UM (2014) Ursula Franklin speaks: thoughts and afterthoughts. McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal
Freire P (1972) Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans.). Herder, New York
Frisch M (1994) Homo faber. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston
Gibson JJ (1977) The theory of affordances. In: Shaw R, Bransford J (eds) Perceiving, acting, and knowing: toward an ecological psychology. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 67–82
Goel AK, Polepeddi L (2019) Jill Watson: a virtual teaching assistant for online education. In: Dede C, Richards J, Saxberg B (eds). Routledge, New York, pp 120–143
Haraway D (2013) Simians, cyborgs, and women: the reinvention of nature. Routledge, New York
Hattie J (2013) Visible learning: a synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Taylor & Francis, London
Heyes C (2018) Cognitive gadgets: the cultural evolution of thinking. Harvard University Press, Harvard
Huntrods R, Dron J (2017) Engagement with robots: building a social, self-paced, online robotics course. Proc E-Learn World Conf E-Learn Corporate Government Healthcare Higher Educ 2017:365–372
Husmann PR, O’Loughlin VD (2019) Another nail in the coffin for learning styles? Disparities among undergraduate anatomy students’ study strategies, class performance, and reported VARK learning styles. Anat Sci Educ 12(1):6–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1777
Kauffman S (2008) Reinventing the sacred: a new view of science, reason and religion. Basic Books, Philadelphia
Kauffman SA (2019) A world beyond physics: the emergence and evolution of life. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Kelly K (2010) What technology wants (Kindly ed.). Viking, New York
Lakhana A (2014) What is educational technology? An Inquiry into the meaning, use, and reciprocity of technology. Canadian J Learn Technol 40(3). Retrieved from http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/823/399
Laurillard D (1993) Rethinking University Teaching—a framework for the effective use of educational technology. Routledge, London
Makel MC, Plucker JA (2014) Facts are more important than novelty: replication in the education sciences. Educ Res 43(6):304–316. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14545513
McDonough EF, Kahn KB (1996) Using ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ technologies for global new product development. R&D Manag 26(3):241–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1996.tb00959.x
McLuhan M, McLuhan E (1992) Laws of media: the new science. University of Toronto Press, Toronto
Means B, Toyama Y, Murphy R, Baki M (2013) The effectiveness of online and blended learning: a meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teach Coll Rec 115(3):1–47
Moore MG (1993) Theory of transactional distance. In: Keegan D (ed) Theoretical principles of distance education. Routledge, London, pp 23–38
Norman DA (1993) Things that make us smart: defending human attributes in the age of the machine. Perseus Publishing, Cambridge
Nye DE (2006) Technology matters: questions to live with. MIT Press, Cambridge
Olson JK (2013) The purposes of schooling and the nature of technology: the end of education. In: Clough MP, Olson JK, Niederhauser DS (eds) The nature of technology. Sense, Rotterdam, pp 217–248
O’Neill RV, DeAngelis DL, Waide JB, Allen TFH (1986) A hierarchical concept of ecosystems. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Page SE (2011) Diversity and complexity. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Pashler H, McDaniel M, Rohrer D, Bjork R (2008) Learning styles: concepts and evidence. Psychol Sci Public Interest 9(3):105–119
Pei L, Wu H (2019) Does online learning work better than offline learning in undergraduate medical education? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Educ Online 24(1):1666538. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2019.1666538
Plato, Jowett B (1993) Symposium and Phaedrus (Jowett B, Trans.). Dover Publications, New York
Polanyi M (1966) The tacit dimension. Routledge, London
Postman N (2011) The end of education: redefining the value of school. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group, New York
Read LE (1958) I, pencil. Imprimis 8(12):32–37. Retrieved from https://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/I-PENCIL-My-Family-Tree-as-Told-to-June-1992.pdf
Rheingold H (2012) Mind amplifier: can our digital tools make us smarter? In: Kindle (ed) TED Books. New York
Ridley M (2010) The rational optimist: how prosperity evolves. HarperCollins e-books, London
Riener C, Willingham D (2010) The myth of learning styles. Change Mag Higher Learn 42(5):32–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2010.503139
Russell TL (1999) The no significant difference phenomenon: as reported in 355 research reports, summaries and papers. North Carolina State University, North Carolina
Saba F, Shearer RL (1994) Verifying key theoretical concepts in a dynamic model of distance education. Am J Distance Educ 8(1):36–59
Tamim RM, Bernard RM, Borokhovski E, Abrami PC, Schmid RF (2011) What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning. Rev Educ Res 81(1):4–28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310393361
Technology (n.d.). In: Oxford University Press, Oxford Dictionary of English. Retrieved 11 December, 2012, from http://www.oxfordreference.com
Turkle S, Papert S (1992) Epistemological pluralism and the revaluation of the concrete. J Math Behav 11(1):3–33. Retrieved from http://papert.org/articles/EpistemologicalPluralism.html
Williams WC (1969) The Wedge. In: Selected essays of William Carlos Williams. New Directions, NY, p 256
Wilson EO (2012) The social conquest of earth, Kindle. Liveright Pub. Corporation, New York
Acknowledgements
I give thanks to Terry Anderson and Gerald Ardito for their insightful feedback and suggestions to improve this work.
Funding
Athabasca University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dron, J. Educational technology: what it is and how it works. AI & Soc 37, 155–166 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01195-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01195-z