Log in

Growth constraints set an upper limit to theropod dinosaur body size

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Science of Nature Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite nearly 200 years of scientific collecting and study, none of the extinct, bipedal, predatory, theropod dinosaurs have been reliably shown to exceed 12 m in length. Using digital 3D models of theropods with lengths spanning 80 cm to 12 m, their body masses were found to scale to the 3.5 power of body lengths. The lateral area of the pelvis and the cross-sectional area of the tail base of these animals corresponds to the cross-sectional areas of key muscle groups important for balance and locomotion, and both scale to the 2.4 power of body length. Body accelerations in the lateral and forward directions are, using F = ma, given by dividing muscle area (force proxy) by body mass. Plotting these acceleration estimates against body length shows them to decrease exponentially. The largest theropods with body lengths of 10–12 m have less than 10% of the acceleration capacity of the smaller forms. The distinct lack of fossil remains of theropods demonstrably longer than 12 m suggests that the theropod body plan had an upper size limit based on a minimum acceleration threshold. Rotational inertia of the theropod body was found to be proportional to body length raised to the 5.5 power, and with increasing length, the capacity for agility would rapidly diminish. The tight relationship between theropod pelvic area and body length allows for the estimation of body lengths of specimens lacking complete axial skeletons, and this is done for four, large, well-preserved pelves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bates KT, Falkingham PL (2012) Estimating maximum bite performance in Tyrannosaurus rex using multi-body dynamics. Biol Let 8:660–664

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bonaparte JF, Novas FE, Coria RA (1990) Carnotaurus sastrei Bonaparte, the lightly built, horned carnosaur from the Middle Cretaceous of Patagonia, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. Contrib Sci 416:1–41

  • Brochu CR (2003) Osteology of Tyrannosaurus rex: insights from a nearly complete skeleton and high-resolution computed tomographic analysis of the skull. Soc Verteb Paleontol Mem 7:1–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckland W (1824) Notice on the Megalosaurus or great Fossil Lizard of Stonesfield. Trans Geol Soc London 1(2):390–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canale JI, Apesteguia S, Gallina PA, Mitchell J, Smith ND, Cullen TM, Shinya A, Haluza A, Gianechini FA, Makovicky PJ (2022) New giant carnivorous dinosaur reveals convergent evolutionary trends in theropod arm reduction. Curr Biol 32:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chure DJ (1995) A reassessment of the gigantic theropod Saurophagus maximus from the Morrison Formation (Upper Jurassic) of Oklahoma, USA", in Sixth Symposium on Mesozoic Terrestrial Ecosystems and Biota, Short Papers. A. Sun, Y. Wang, Eds. Bei**g: China Ocean Press: 103–106

  • Conrad JL (2018) A new lizard (Squamata) was the last meal of Compsognathus(Theropoda: Dinosauria) and is a holotype in a holotype. Zool J Linn Soc 183:584–634

  • Coria RA, Currie PJ (2006) A new carcharodontosaurid (Dinosauria, Theropoda) from the Upper Cretaceous of Argentina". Geodiversitas 28(1):71–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Coria RA, Salgado L (1995) A new giant carnivorous dinosaur from the Cretaceous of Patagonia. Nature 377(6546):224–226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Currie PJ (1997) Theropods. In: Farlow JO, Brett-Surman MK (eds) The Complete Dinosaur. Indiana University Press, Indianapolis, pp 216–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie PJ, Carpenter K (2000) A new specimen of Acrocanthosaurus atokensis (Theropoda, Dinosauria) from the Lower Cretaceous Antlers Formation (Lower Cretaceous, Aptian) of Oklahoma, USA. Geodiversitas 22(2):207–246

    Google Scholar 

  • dos AnosCandeiro CR, Brusatte SL, Vidal L, da Costa Pereira PVLG (2018) Paleobiogeographic evolution and distribution of Carcharodontosauridae (Dinosauria, Theropoda) during the middle Cretaceous of North Africa. Papéis Avulsos De Zoologia 58:e20185829

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday D, Resnick R (1988) Rolling, torque and angular momentum. Fundamentals of Physics, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 256–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson DM (1999) Estimating the masses and centers of mass of extinct animals by 3-D mathematical slicing. Paleobiology 25(1):88–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson DM (2002) The eyes have it: the sizes, shapes, and orientations of theropod orbits as indicators of skull strength and bite force. J Vertebr Paleontol 22(4):766–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson DM (2006) Floating point: a computational study of buoyancy, equilibrium and gastroliths in plesiosaurs. Lethaia 39:227–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson DM (2010) Pterosaur body mass estimates from three-dimensional mathematical slicing. J Vertebr Paleontol 30(3):768–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson DM (2012) Engineering a dinosaur. In: Farlow JO, Brett-Surman MK (eds) The Complete Dinosaur, 2nd edn. Indiana University Press, Indianapolis, pp 637–665

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson DM (2018) A buoyancy, balance and stability challenge to the hypothesis of a semi-aquatic Spinosaurus Stromer, 1915 (Dinosauria: Theropoda). PeerJ 6(e5409):1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson DM, Snively E (2004) Tyrannosaurus en pointe: allometry minimized rotational inertia of large carnivorous dinosaurs. Proc r Soc Lond B (suppl) 271:S57–S60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson JR, Garcia M (2002) Tyrannosaurus was not a fast runner. Nature 415:1018–1021

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson JR, Gatesy SM (2000) Adductors, abductors, and the evolution of archosaur locomotion. Paleobiology 26(4):734–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson JR, Bates KT, Molnar J, Allen V, Makovicky PJ (2011) A computational analysis of limb and body dimensions in Tyrannosaurus rex with implications for locomotion, ontogeny and growth. PLoS ONE 6(10):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim N, Sereno PC, dal Sasso C, Maganuco S, Fabbri M, Martill DM, Zouhri S, Myhrvold N, Lurino DA (2014) Semiaquatic adaptations in a giant predatory dinosaur. Science 345(6262):1232–1236

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim N, Mananuco S, dal Sasso C, Fabbri M, Auditore M, Bindellini G, Martill DM, Zouhri S, Mattarelli DA, Unwin DM, Wiemann J, Bonadonna D, Amane A, Jakubczak J, Joger U, Lauder GV, Pierce SE (2020) Tail-propelled aquatic locomotion in a theropod dinosaur. Nature 581:67–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kellner AWA, Azevedo SAK, Machado EB, Carvalho LB, Henriques DDR (2011) A new dinosaur (Theropoda, Spinosauridae) from the Cretaceous (Cenomanian) Alcântara Formation, Cajual Island, Brazil. (PDF). An Acad Bras Ciências 83(1):99–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loewen MA, Irmis RB, Sertich JJW, Currie PJ, Sampson SD (2013) Tyrant dinosaur evolution tracks the rise and fall of Late Cretaceous oceans. PLoS ONE 8(11):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novas FE, de Valais S, Vickers-Rich P, Rich TH (2005) A large Cretaceous theropod from Patagonia, Argentina and the evolution of carcharodontosaurids. Naturwissenschaften 92(5):226–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom JH (1978) The osteology of Compsognathuslongipes. Zitteliana 4:73–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul G (1988) Predatory dinosaurs of the world. Simon and Schuster, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul G (2016) The Princeton Field Guide to Dinosaurs, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Persons WSI, Currie PJ (2011) The tail of Tyrannosaurus: reassessing the size and locomotive importance of the M.caudifemoralis in non-avian theropods. Anat Rec 294:119–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porro LB, Holliday CM, Anapol F, Ontiveros LC, Ontiveros LT, Ross CF (2011) Free body analysis, beam mechanics, and finite element modeling of the mandible of Alligator mississippiensis. J Morphol 272:910–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes MM, Henderson DM, Currie PJ (2021) Maniraptoran pelvic musculature highlights evolutionary patterns in theropod locomotion on the line to birds. PeerJ 9(10855):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Nielsen K (1989) Scaling: why is animal size so important? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sereno PC (1993) The pectoral girdle and forelimb of the basal theropod Herrerasaurusischigualastensis. J Vertebr Paleontol 13(4):425–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sereno PC, Beck AL, Dutheil D, Gado B, Larsson HCE, Lyon GH, M JD, Rauhut OWM, Sadlier RW, Sidor CA, Varrichio DJ, Wilson GP, Wilson JA (1998) A long-snouted predatory dinosaur from Africa and the evolution of spinosaurids. Sci 282:1298–1302

  • Taylor CR, Weibel ER (1981) Design of the mammalian respiratory system I Problem and Strategy. Respir Physiol 44:1–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Welles SP (1984) Dilophosauruswetherilli (Dinosauria: Theropoda) osteology and comparison. Palaeontogr Abt A 185:85–180

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donald M. Henderson.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Communicated by: Robert R Reisz

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Henderson, D.M. Growth constraints set an upper limit to theropod dinosaur body size. Sci Nat 110, 4 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-023-01832-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-023-01832-1

Keywords

Navigation