Log in

Radiomic analysis to predict local response in locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy

  • Radiotherapy
  • Published:
La radiologia medica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Aim of this study is to assess the ability of contrast-enhanced CT image-based radiomic analysis to predict local response (LR) in a retrospective cohort of patients affected by pancreatic cancer and treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Secondary aim is to evaluate progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at long-term follow-up.

Methods

Contrast-enhanced-CT images of 37 patients who underwent SBRT were analyzed. Two clinical variables (BED, CTV volume), 27 radiomic features were included. LR was used as the outcome variable to build the predictive model. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to evaluate PFS and OS.

Results

Three variables were statistically correlated with the LR in the univariate analysis: Intensity Histogram (StdValue feature), Gray Level Cooccurrence Matrix (GLCM25_Correlation feature) and Neighbor Intensity Difference (NID25_Busyness feature). Multivariate model showed GLCM25_Correlation (P = 0.007) and NID25_Busyness (P = 0.03) as 2 independent predictive variables for LR. The odds ratio values of GLCM25_Correlation and NID25_Busyness were 0.07 (95%CI 0.01–0.49) and 8.10 (95%CI 1.20–54.40), respectively. The area under the curve for the multivariate logistic regressive model was 0.851 (95%CI 0.724–0.978). At a median follow-up of 30 months, median PFS was 7 months (95%CI 6-NA); median OS was 11 months (95%CI 10–22 months).

Conclusions

This analysis identified a radiomic signature that correlates with LR. To confirm these results, prospective studies could identify patient sub-groups with different rates of radiation dose–response to define a more personalized SBRT approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lockhart AC, Rothenberg ML, Berlin JD (2005) Treatment for pancreatic cancer: current therapy and continued progress. Gastroenterology 128(6):1642–1654

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Li D, **e K, Wolff R, Abbruzzese JL (2004) Pancreatic cancer. Lancet 363(9414):1049–1057

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Worni M, Guller U, White RR et al (2013) Modest improvement in overall survival for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: a trend analysis using the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results registry from 1988 to 2008. Pancreas 42:1157–1163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brennan MF, Kattan MW, Klimstra D et al (2004) Prognostic nomogram for patients undergoing resection for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Ann Surg 240:293–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mazzola R, Corradini S, Gregucci F et al (2019) Role of radiosurgery/stereotactic radiotherapy in oligometastatic disease: brain oligometastases. Front Oncol 9:206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Meduri B, Gregucci F, D’Angelo E et al (2020) Volume de-escalation in radiation therapy: state of the art and new perspectives. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 146(4):909–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H (2016) Radiomics: images are more than pictures, they are data. Radiology 278(2):563–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Macgregor-Das AM, Iacobuzio-Donahue CA (2013) Molecular pathways in pancreatic carcinogenesis. J Surg Oncol 107:8e14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chu GC, Kimmelman AC, Hezel AF, DePinho RA (2007) Stromal biology of pancreatic cancer. J Cell Biochem 101:887–907

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Neesse A, Krug S, Gress TM et al (2013) Emerging concepts in pancreatic cancer medicine: targeting the tumor stroma. Onco Targets Ther 7:33–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fisher R, Pusztai L, Swanton C (2013) Cancer heterogeneity: implications for targeted therapeutics. Br J Cancer 108:479–485

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (2020) Pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Version 2. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/ physician_gls/PDF/pancreatic.pdf. Accessed 1 May 2020.

  13. Tamm EP, Balachandran A, Bhosale P, Szklaruk J (2009) Update on 3D and multiplanar MDCT in the assessment of biliary and pancreatic pathology. Abdom Imaging 34:64–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mazzola R, Fersino S, Gregucci F et al (2018) Linac-based stereotactic body radiation therapy for unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer: risk-adapted dose prescription and image-guided delivery. Strahlenther Onkol 194(9):835–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Koay EJ, Truty MJ, Cristini V et al (2014) Transport properties of pancreatic cancer describe gemcitabine delivery and response. J Clin Invest 124(4):1525–1536

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Farrell JJ, Elsaleh H, Garcia M et al (2009) Human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 levels predict response to gemcitabine in patients with pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology 136(1):187–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hanania A, Bantis L, Feng Z et al (2016) Quantitative imaging to evaluate malignant potential of IPMNs. Oncotarget 7:85776–85784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Permuth J, Choi J, Balarunathan Y et al (2016) Combining radiomic features with a miRNA classifier may improve prediction of malignant pathology for pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. Oncotarget 7:85785–85797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen X, Oshima K, Schott D et al (2017) Assessment of treatment response during chemoradiation therapy for pancreatic cancer based on quantitative radiomic analysis of daily CTs: an exploratory study. PlosOne 12:e0178961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Eilaghi A, Baig S, Zhang Y et al (2017) CT texture features are associated with overall survival in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma–a quantitative analysis. BMC Med Imaging 17:38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cozzi L, Dinapoli N, Fogliata A et al (2017) Radiomics based analysis to predict local control and survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy. BMC Cancer 17:829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cozzi L, Comito T, Fogliata A et al (2019) Computed tomography based radiomic signature as predictive of survival and local control after stereotactic body radiation therapy in pancreatic carcinoma. PLoS One 14(1):e0210758. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210758

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang L, Fried DV, Fave XJ et al (2015) IBEX: an open infrastructure software platform to facilitate collaborative work in radiomics. Med Phys 42(3):1341–1353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. R Core Team (2018) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.

  25. Nardone V, Reginelli A, Scala F et al (2019) Magnetic-resonance-imaging texture analysis predicts early progression in rectal cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2019:8505798. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8505798

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Castellano G, Bonilha L, Li LM et al (2004) Texture analysis of medical images. Clin Radiol 59(12):1061–1069

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Neesse A, Pl M, Frese KK et al (2011) Stromal biology and therapy in pancreatic cancer. Gut 60:861–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kamisawa T, Wood LD, Itoi T et al (2016) Pancreatic cancer. Lancet 388:73–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Herman JM, Chang DT, Goodman KA et al (2015) Phase 2 multi-institutional trial evaluating gemcitabine and stereotactic body radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer 121:1128–1137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Davnall F, Yip CS, Ljungqvist G et al (2012) Assessment of tumor heterogeneity: an emerging imaging tool for clinical practice? Insights Imaging 3(6):573–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yue Y, Osipov A, Fraass B et al (2016) Identifying prognostic intratumor heterogeneity using pre- and post-radiotherapy 18F-FDG PET images for pancreatic cancer patients. J Gastrointest Oncol 8:127–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mazzola R, Fersino S, Alongi P et al (2018) Stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver oligometastases: predictive factors of local response by 18 F-FDG-PET/CT. Br J Radiol 91(1088):20180058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sollini M, Cozzi L, Antunovic L et al (2017) PET Radiomics in NSCLC: state of the art and a proposal for harmonization of methodology. Sci Rep 7:358

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabiana Gregucci.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gregucci, F., Fiorentino, A., Mazzola, R. et al. Radiomic analysis to predict local response in locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy. Radiol med 127, 100–107 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-021-01422-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-021-01422-z

Keywords

Navigation