Abstract
The current article reports the first attempt to test the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP), as a group-based measure of natural verbal relations, using both response-latency and event-related potentials as dependent variables. On each trial of the IRAP, participants were presented with 1 of 2 attribute stimuli (“Pleasant” or “Unpleasant”), a positive (e.g., “Love”) or negative (e.g., “Murder”) target stimulus, and 2 relational terms, “Similar” and “Opposite,” as response options. Participants were required to respond as quickly and accurately as possible across blocks of trials, with half of the blocks requiring responses that were deemed consistent (e.g., Pleasant–Love–Similar), and the other half inconsistent (e.g., Pleasant–Love–Opposite), with natural verbal relations. Shorter mean latencies were predicted for consistent than for inconsistent blocks. Two separate experiments supported this prediction. Event-related potentials, gathered during the second experiment, also proved to be sensitive to the IRAP, yielding more negative waveforms for inconsistent relative to consistent blocks of trials. A theoretical interpretation of the IRAP effect is offered, and important directions for future research are highlighted.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BARNES, D., & HOLMES, Y. (1991). Radical behaviorism, stimulus equivalence, and human cognition. The Psychological Record, 41, 19–31.
BARNES, D., LAWLOR, H., SMEETS, P.M., & ROCHE, B. (1996). Stimulus equivalence and academic self-concept among mildly mentally handicapped and nonhandicapped children. The Psychological Record, 46, 87–107.
BARNES-HOLMES, D. (2003). For the radical behaviorist biological events are not biological and public events are not public. Behavior and Philosophy, 31, 145–150.
BARNES-HOLMES, D., BARNES-HOLMES, Y., POWER, P., HAYDEN, E., MILNE, R., & STEWART, I. (2006). Do you really know what you believe? Develo** the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (Irap) as a direct measure of implicit beliefs. The Irish Psychologist, 32, 169–177.
BARNES-HOLMES, D., REGAN, D., BARNES-HOLMES, Y., COMMINS, S., WALSH, D., STEWART, I., et al. (2005). Relating derived relations as a model of analogical reasoning: Reaction times and event related potentials. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 84, 435–452.
BARNES-HOLMES, D., STTON, C., BARNES-HOLMES, Y., WHELAN, R., STEWART, I., COMMINS, S., et al. (2004). Interfacing relational frame theory with cognitive neuroscience: Semantic priming, the implicit association test, and event related potentials. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy,, 215–240.
BARNES-HOLMES, D., STAUNTON, C., WHELAN R., BARNES-HOLMES, Y., COMMINS, S., WALSH, D., Et al. (2005). Derived stimulus relations, semantic priming, and event-related potentials: Testing a behavioral theory of semantic networks. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 84, 417–434.
CAIRNS, E. (1984). Social identity in Northern Ireland. Human Relations, 37, 1095–1102.
DE HOUWER, J. (2002). The Implicit Association Test as a tool for studying dysfunctional associations in psychopathology: Strengths and limitations. Journal of Behaviour Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 33, 115–133.
DE HOUWER, J. (2006). What are implicit attitudes and why are we using them? In R. W. Wiers & A. W. Stacy (Eds.), The handbook of implicit cognition and addiction (pp. 11–28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers.
DE JONG, P. (2002). Implicit self-esteem and social anxiety: Differential self-positivity effects in high and low anxious individuals. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40, 501–508.
DE JONG, P., PASMAN, W., KINDT, M.,., & VAN DEN HOUT, M. A. (2001). A reaction time paradigm to assess (implicit) complaint-specific dysfunctional beliefs. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 39, 101–113.
DIXON, M. R., REHFELDT, R. A., ZLOMKE, K. M., & ROBINSON, A. (2006). Exploring the development and dismantling of equivalence classes involving terrorist stimuli. The Psychological Record, 56, 83–103.
DOVIDIO, J. F., & FAZIO, R. H. (1992). New technologies for the direct and indirect assessment of attitudes. In J. Tanur (Ed.), Questions about questions: Meaning, memory, expression and social interaction in surveys (pp. 204–237) New York: Sage.
GEMAR, M. C., SEGAL Z. V., SAGRATI, S., & KENNEDY, S. J. (2001). Mood-induced changes on the Implicit Association Test in recovered depressed patients. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 282–289.
GREENWALD, A. G., & BANAJI, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 4–27.
GREENWALD, A. G., BANAJI, M. R., RUDMAN, L. A., FARNHAM, S. D., NOSEK, B. A., & MELLOTT, D. S. (2002). A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review, 109, 3–25.
GREENWALD, A. G., MCGHEE, D. E., & SCHWARTZ, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.
GREENWALD, A. G., NOSEK, B. A., & BANAJI, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216.
HAYES, S. C., BARNES-HOLMES, D., ROCHE, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum.
HAYES, S. C., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & ROCHE, B. (2003). Behavior analysis, relational frame theory, and the challenge of human language and cognition: A reply to the commentaries on relational frame theory—A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 19, 39–54.
HOLCOMB, P. J., & ANDERSON, J. E. (1993). Cross-modal semantic priming: A time-course analysis using event-related potentials. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 327–411.
KOUNIOS, S. A., & HOLCOMB P. J. (1992). Structure and process in semantic memory: Evidence from event-related potentials and reaction times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 460–480.
KUTAS, M. (1993). In the company of other words: Electrophysiological evidence for simple-word and sentence-context effects. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 533–578.
KUTAS, M., & HILLIARD, S. A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307, 1161-1163.
LESLIE, J. C., TIERNEY, K. J., ROBINSON, C. P., KEENAN, M., WATT, A., & BARNES, D. (1993). Differences between clinically anxious and non-anxious subjects in a stimulus equivalence training task involving threat words. The Psychological Record, 43, 153–161.
MCKENNA, I., BARNES-HOLMES, D., BARNES-HOLMES, Y., & STEWART, I. (2007). Testing the fake-ability of the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (Irap): The first study. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy,, 123–138.
MERWIN, R. M., & WILSON, K. G. (2005). Preliminary findings on the effects of self-referring and evaluative stimuli on stimulus equivalence class formation. The Psychological Record, 55, 561–575.
O’HORA, D., BARNES-HOLMES, D., ROCHE, B., & SMEETS, P.M. (2004). Derived relational networks and control by novel instructions: A possible model of generative verbal responding. The Psychological Record, 54, 437–460.
O’HORA, D., PELAEZ, M., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & AMESTY, L. (2005). Derived relational responding and human language: Evidence from the Wais III. The Psychological Record, 55, 155–174.
O’TOOLE, C., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & SMYTH, S. (2007). A derived transfer of functions and the Implicit Association Test. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 88, 263–283.
SIDMAN, S. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston, MA: Authors Cooperative.
STEWART, I., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & ROCHE, B. (2002). Develo** an ecologically valid model of analogy using the relational evaluation procedure. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 20, 12–16.
STEWART, I., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & ROCHE, B. (2004). A functional analytic model of analogy using the relational evaluation procedure. The Psychological Record, 54, 531–552.
TEACHMAN, B. A., GREGG, A. P., & WOODY, S. R. (2001). Implicit associations of fear-relevant stimuli among individuals with snake and spider fears. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 226–235.
WALTZ, J. A., KNOWLTON, B. J., HOLYOAY, K. J., BOONE, K. B., MISHKIN, F. S., SANTOS, M. D., Et Al. (1999). A system for relational reasoning in human prefrontal cortex. Psychological Science, 10, 119–125.
WATT, A. W., KEENAN, M., BARNES, D., & CAIRNS, E. (1991). Social categorization and stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 41, 33–50.
WEISBROD, M., KEIFER M., WINKLER, S., MAIER, S., HILL, R., ROESCH-ELY, D., Et Al. (1999). Electrophysiological correlates of direct versus indirect semantic priming in normal volunteers. Cognitive Brain Research, 8, 289–298.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barnes-Holmes, D., Hayden, E., Barnes-Holmes, Y. et al. The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (Irap) As a Response-Time and Event-Related-Potentials Methodology for Testing Natural Verbal Relations: A Preliminary Study. Psychol Rec 58, 497–516 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395634
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395634