Log in

Reproduction of the least weasel in captivity: basic observations and the influence of food availability

  • Published:
Acta Theriologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The least weaselMustela nivalis nivalis Linnaeus, 1766 is unique among carnivores because of its small body size and capacity for fast reproduction. It has been suggested to be the main agent for maintaining cyclic fluctuations in northern vole populations, largely based on its high reproductive potential and dependence on small rodents. This study describes basic reproductive data on the least weasel obtained during a captive breeding program. In the experiments, food availability was manipulated at the onset of breeding. Altogether, 65 litters were born during the 5-year study. The mean litter size was 5.1 (in 53 litters of known litter size), the most common litter size being six. The sex ratio of weaned young was not biased from 1∶1. The median date of birth was June 4. Food manipulations did not affect mating frequency suggesting that the observation of failure in breeding in years of low abundance of small mammals is due to mortality of embryos or young before weaning, but not due to avoidance of breeding at low food availability. In this respect, weasels differ from other main vole predators, owls and raptors, which often skip breeding if small mammals are scarce.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blomquist L., Muuronen P. and Rantanen V. 1981. Breeding the least weasel in Helsinki Zoo. Zoologische Garten N. F., Jena 51: 363–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collett R. 1911–1912. [Mammals of Norway]. Aschehoug & Co, Christiania: 1–744. [In Norwegian]

    Google Scholar 

  • Danilov P. I. and Tumanov I. L. 1980. Female reproductive cycles in the Mustelidae. [In: Biology of mustelids: some Soviet research. Vol. 2. C. M. King, ed]. New Zealand Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Wellington: 81–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deanesly R. 1944. The reproductive cycle of the female weasel (Mustela nivalis). Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 114: 339–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • East K. and Lockie J. D. 1964. Observations on a family of weasels (Mustela nivalis) bred in captivity. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 143: 359–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • East K. and Lockie J. D. 1965. Further observations on weasels (Mustela nivalis) and stoats (Mustela erminea) born in captivity. Journal of Zoology, London 147: 234–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erlinge S. 1974. Distribution, territoriality and numbers of the weaselMustela nivalis in relation to prey abundance. Oikos 25: 308–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald B. M. 1981. Predatory birds and mammals. [In: Tundra ecosystems: a comparative analysis. L. C. Bliss, J. B. Cragg, D. W. Hea and J. J. Moore, eds]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 485–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank F. 1974. Wurfzahlund Wurffolge beim nordischen Wiesel. Zeitschrift für Säugertierkunde 39: 248–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall E. R. 1951. American weasels. University of Kansas, Publications of the Museum of Natural History 4: 1–466.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I., Henttonen H. and Hansson L. 1991. Specialist predators, generalist predators, and the microtine rodent cycle. Journal of Animal Ecology 60: 353–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I., Henttonen H., Korpimäki E., Oksanen L. and Turchin P. 2001. Small rodent dynamics and predation. Ecology 82: 1505–1520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson L. 1984. Winter reproduction of small mammals in relation to food conditions and population dynamics. [In: Winter ecology of small mammals. J. F. Merritt, ed]. Special Publication of Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Pittsburgh 10: 225–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson L. and Henttonen H. 1985. Gradients in density variations of small rodents: the importance of latitude and snow cover. Oecologia 67: 394–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson L. and Henttonen H. 1988. Rodent dynamics as community processes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 3: 195–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman L. 1964. The behaviour and breeding of captive weasels (Mustela nivalis L.). New Zealand Journal of Science 7: 147–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidt G. A. 1970. The least weaselMustela nivalis Linnaeus. Developmental biology in comparison with other North AmericanMustela. Publications of the Museum, Michigan State University Biological Series 4: 227–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidt G. A., Petersen M. K. and Kirkland G. L. J. 1968. Mating behavior and development of least weasels (Mustela nivalis) in captivity. Journal of Mammalogy 49: 413–419.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henttonen H. 1987. The impact of spacing behaviour in microtine rodents on the dynamics of the least weasel — a hypothesis. Oikos 50: 366–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henttonen H., McGuire A. and Hansson L. 1985. Comparisons of amplitudes and frequencies (spectral analysis) of density variations in long term data sets ofClethrionomys species. Annales Zoologici Fennici 22: 221–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henttonen H., Oksanen T., Jortikka A. and Haukisalmi V. 1987. How much do weasels shape microtine cycles in the northern Fennoscandian taiga? Oikos 50: 353–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heptner V. G., Naumov N. P., Yurgenson P. B., Sludskii A. A., Chirkova A. F. and Bannikov A. G. 1967. [Mammals of Soviet Union]. Vysshaya Shkola, Moscow: 1–1004. [In Russian]

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjortdal J., Dahl S. O. and Hufthammer A. K. 1993. Summer pelaged weasels in winter: indication of winter reproduction. Fauna Norvegica Series A 14: 63–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jędrzejewska B. 1987. Reproduction in weaselsMustela nivalis in Poland. Acta Theriologica 32: 493–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • King C. M. 1975a. The home range of the weasel (Mustela nivalis) in an English woodland. Journal of Animal Ecology 44: 639–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King C. M. 1975b. The sex ratio of trapped weasels Mustela nivalis. Mammalian Review 3: 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King C. M. 1980. Population biology of the weasel Mustela nivalis on British game estates. Holarctic Ecology 3: 160–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • King C. M. 1989. Natural history of weasels and stoats. Christopher Helm, London: 1–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korpimäki E. and Norrdahl K. 1989. Avian predation on mustelids in Europe 2: impact on small mustelids and microtine dynamics — a hypothesis. Oikos 55: 273–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korpimäki E., Norrdahl K. and Rinta-Jaskari T. 1991. Responses of stoats and least weasels to fluctuating food abundance: is the low phase of the vole cycle due to mustelid predation? Oecologia 88: 552–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindström E. 1988. Reproductive effort in the red fox,Vulpes vulpes, and supply of a fluctuating prey. Oikos 52: 115–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockie J. D. 1966. Territory in small carnivores. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London 18: 143–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • May R. M. 1981. Models for single populations. [In: Theoretical ecology principles and applications. R. M. May, ed]. Blackwell, Oxford: 5–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald R. A. 1998. The effect of wildlife management on stoatsMustela erminea and weaselsMustela nivalis in Great Britain. PhD thesis, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK: 1–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijer T., Daan S. and Hall M. 1990. Family planning in the kestrel (Falco tinnunculus): the proximate control of covariation of laying date and clutch size. Behaviour 114: 117–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikkola H. 1983. Owls of Europe. T & A D Poyser, Calton: 1–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moors P. J. 1977. Studies of the metabolism, food consumption and assimilation of a small carnivore, the weasel (Mustela nivalis L.). Oecologia 27: 185–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moors P. J. 1980. Sexual dimorphism in the body size of mustelids (Carnivora): the roles of food habits and breeding systems. Oikos 34: 147–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton I. 1979. Population ecology of raptors. T & A D Poyser, London: 1–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norrdahl K. and Korpimäki E. 2000. Do predators limit the abundance of alternative prey? Experiments with vole-eating avian and mammalian predators. Oikos 91: 528–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyholm E. 1972. [Weasel]. [In: Mammals of Finland. Vol 2. L. Siivonen, ed]. Otava, Helsinki: 187–199. [In Finnish]

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohl L. 1910. Wieselstudien. Zoologischer Beobachter 51: 234–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short H. L. 1961. Food habits of a captive weasel. Journal of Mammalogy 42: 273–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenseth N. C. and Ims R. A. 1993. Population dynamics of lemmings: temporal and spatial variation — an introduction. [In: The biology of lemmings. N. C. Stenseth and R. A. Ims, eds]. Academic Press, London: 61–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapper S. 1979. The effect of fluctuating vole numbers (Microtus agrestis) on a population of weasels (Mustela nivalis) on farmland. Journal of Animal Ecology 48: 603–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sundell, J. Reproduction of the least weasel in captivity: basic observations and the influence of food availability. Acta Theriol 48, 59–72 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03194266

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03194266

Key words

Navigation