Log in

Reexamination of sectional classification in far easternEuphorbia subgenusEsula (Euphorbiaceae) using morphological and phenolic data

  • Published:
Journal of Plant Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reexamining the classification proposed by Hurusawa, the phylogeny of Far EasternEuphorbia subgenusEsula was analyzed using thirteen morphological and seventeen phenolic compound data. These data were analyzed independently and in combination using PAUP under the assumptions of Fitch parsimony. Ten species, comprised of three sections and five subsections within Far EasternEuphorbia subg.Esula and one outgroup from subg.Chamaesyce, were used as terminal taxa. The phylogenetic results did not support the sectional classifications within subg.Esula proposed by Hurusawa. SectionDecussatae was nested in the paraphyletic sectEsula in all of the analyses, and the relationship of sectHelioscopiae was equivocal among data sets. The disagreement of data sets over the placement ofEuphorbia ebracteolata is probably due to a hybrid origin of the species and missing phenolic data forE. pallasii. A sister-group relationship of the Korean endemicE. fauriei with the widespreadE. pekinensis was strongly supported by the morphological and phenolic data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Ahn B, Lee S, Ro J, Lee K (1995) A chemotaxonomic study on Euphorbiaceae in Korea. Nat Prod Sci 1: 86–98

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baum DA, Small RL, Wendel J (1998) Biogeography and floral evolution of Baobabs (Adansonia, Bombacaceae) as inferred from multiple data sets. Syst Biol 47: 181–207

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boissier PE (1862) Euphorbiaceae, subordo Euphorbieae,In A de Candolle, ed, Prodromus Systematis Naturalis Regni Vegitalis 15(2), Masson and Son, Paris, pp 3–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter S, Radcliffe-Smith A (1988) Euphorbiaceae,In RM Polhill, ed, Flora of Tropical East Africa, AA Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 409–567

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall KA, Fitzpatrick JF (1996) Crayfish molecular sys-tematics: using a combination of procedures to estimate phylogeny. Syst Biol 45: 1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Queiroz K (1993) For consensus (sometimes). Syst Biol 42: 368–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Queiroz A, Donoghue MJ, Kim J (1995) Separate versus combined analysis of phylogenetic evidence. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 26: 657–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forster PI (1994) Revision ofEuphorbia plumerioides Teijsm. ex Hassk. (Euphorbiaceae) and allies. Aus-trobaileya 4: 245–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurusawa I (1940) Species generis Euphorbiae Imperii Japonici (I). J Jap Bot 16: 330–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurusawa I (1954) Eine nochmalige Durchsicht des herkommlichen Systems der Euphorbiaceen im weit-eren Sinne. J Fac Sci Univ Tokyo III. 6: 210–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan MS (1964) Taxonomic revision ofEuphorbia in Turkey. Notes Royal Bot Card 25: 71–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitching IJ, Forey PL, Humphries CJ, William DM (1998) Cladistics: the theory and practice of parsimony analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuzmanov B (1964) On the origin of Euphorbia subg.Esula in Europe (Euphorbiaceae). Blumea 12: 369–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma JS, Wu CY (1992) A synopsis of ChineseEuphorbia L. s. I. (Euphorbiaceae). Collect Bot 21: 97–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Molero J, Rovira AM (1992)Euphorbia L. subsect.Esula (Boiss.) Pax in the Iberian Peninsula. Leaf surface, chromosome numbers and taxonomic treatment. Collect Bot 21: 121–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Normark BB, Lanteri AA (1998) Incongruence between morphological and mitochondrial-DNA characters suggests hybrid origins of parthenogenetic weevil lineages (genusAramigus). Syst Biol 47: 475–494

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Park K (1998) Monograph ofEuphorbia sect.Tithymalopsis (Euphorbiaceae). Edinb J Bot 55: 161–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park K, Lee S (1988) A palynotaxonomic study of the Korean Euphorbiaceae. Kor J Plant Tax 18: 69–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Prokhanov Yl (1949) Euphorbia L,In Komarov, ed, Flora URSS, Vol 14. pp 304–495

  • Schilling EE, Panero JL (1996) Phylogenetic reticulation in subtribe Helianthinae. Am J Bot 83: 939–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swofford DL (1991) PAUP, Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony, version 3.0s, Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign

  • Webster GL (1967) The genera of Euphorbiaceae in the southeastern United States. J Arnold Arbor 48: 303–430

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ki-Ryong Park.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Park, KR., Ahn, BT. & Lee, KS. Reexamination of sectional classification in far easternEuphorbia subgenusEsula (Euphorbiaceae) using morphological and phenolic data. J. Plant Biol. 42, 199–204 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03030479

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03030479

Keywords

Navigation