Log in

Competence: commodification of human ability

  • Article and Report
  • Published:
Asia Pacific Education Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to analyze the meaning and presumptions of competence in the concrete context of knowledge capitalism. First, the nature of competence as a ‘commodification of human ability’ that obtains a standardized monetary value to sell in the labor market, is elucidated by applying Karl Marx’s critical theory. Second, it is further investigated that, in the new context of the global learning economy, the production of the competence as a commodity itself becomes a key industry, representing itself a crucialsub- system of knowledge capitalism. Third, this paper explains how competence discourse has a great deal to do with the current drastic changes in the educational paradigm from ‘nation-state education’ to ‘global learning economy’. These changes are illustrated by how traditional school subject-based curricula are replaced by competency-based curricula, academic qualifications integrated into a unified form of qualification framework, and school achievement is evaluated according to the ‘demanded workplace competence’. It is also argued that human competencies by nature have ‘double-bind’ characteristics: while it is pushed to meet the demands as knowledge commodities, human beings themselves are beyond any notion of tradability, and the new capitalism based on human commodities, if any, should reveal new rules to play the game.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apple, M. W. (1993).Official knowledge: Democratic education in a conservative age. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, A. (1984).A guide to Marx’s Capital. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brien, K. M. (2006). Humanistic Marxism and the transformation of reason.Dialogue and Universalism (5-6), 39–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton-Jones, A. (1999).Knowledge capitalism: Business, work, and learning in the new economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. (1998). From Capitalism to knowledge society. In D. Neef (Ed.),The knowledge economy. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, J. (2002).Lifelong learning and the new educational order. Sterling: Trentham Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977).Discipline and punishment: The birth of prison. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (1993).Border crossings: Cultural workers and the politics of education. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodson, I., & Dowbiggin, I. (1990). Docile bodies: Commonalities in the history of psychiatry and schooling. In S. J. Ball (Ed.),Foucault and Education: Discipline and Knowledge (pp. 105–129). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B. (1979). Knowledge as a commodity and participatory research.Prospects, 9(4), 393–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, S. (2008), forthcoming). The lifelong learning ecosystem in Korea:Evolution of learning capitalism?International Journal of Lifelong Education.

  • Jarvis, P. (2007).Globalization, lifelong learning and the learning society: sociological perspectives. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liston, D. P. (1988).Capitalist Schools: Explanation and ethics in radical studies of schooling.

  • Marcuse, H. (1972). The foundation of historical materialism. InStudies in critical philosophy. New York: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C. (1973).Testing for competency rather than for intelligence.American Psychologist,28(1).

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995).The knowledge-creating company. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2002).Understanding the brain: Towards a new learning science. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2003).Networks of innovation: Towards new models for managing schools and systems. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2004).International schooling for tomorrow forum: Background OECD papers, The schooling senarios.international schooling for tomorrow forum, June 6–8th 2004, Toronto, Canada.

  • Olssen, M. (2006). Understanding the mechanisms of neoliberal control: lifelong learning, flexibility and knowledge capitalism.International Journal of Lifelong Education, 25(3), 213–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raven, J. (2001). The conceptualization of competence. In J. Raven (Ed.),Comperence in the learning society. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rychen, D. S., & Salganik, L. H. (Eds.). (2003).Key competencies: for a successful life and a well-functioning society. Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe & Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuetze, H. G. (2006). International concepts and agendas of lifelong learning.Compare, 36(3), 289–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P., Kleiner, A., Roberts, C, Ross, R., & Smith, B. (1994).The fifth discipline Fieldbook: Strategies and tools for building a learning organization. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R., Forsythe, G., Hudlund, J., Horvath, J., Wagner, R., Williams, W., et al. (2000).Practical Intelligence in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, M. A. (1999). Flexible education and the discipline of the market.Qualitative Studies in Education, 12(3), 311–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, R. A. (2001).Foundations of human resource development. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. F. D. (1998).The curriculum of the future: From the ‘New Sociology of Education’ to a critical theory of learning. London: Palmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soonghee Han.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Han, S. Competence: commodification of human ability. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 9, 31–39 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03025823

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03025823

Key words

Navigation