Log in

The medullosan pteridosperms

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Bibliography

  • Andrews, H. N. 1945. Contributions to our knowledge of American Carboniferous floras. VII. Some pteridosperm stems from Iowa. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.32: 323–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————— andJ. A. Kernen. 1946. Contributions to our knowledge of American Carboniferous floras. VIII. AnotherMedullosa from Iowa. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.33: 141–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————— andS. H. Mamay. 1953. Some American medullosas. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.40: 183–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, C. A. 1947. An introduction to paleobotany.

  • —————. 1953. Origin and relationships of the cycads. Phytomorphology3: 51–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— andW. E. Steidtmann. 1937. Pteridospermous plants from the Pennsylvanian of Illinois and Missouri. Amer. Jour. Bot.24: 644–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bancroft, Nellie. 1914. Pteridosperm anatomy and its relation to that of the cycads. New Phytol.13: 41–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, R. W. 1949. Some pteridosperm stems and fructifications with particular reference to the medullosae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.36: 287–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, P. 1913. Les fructifications de Névroptéridées recueillies dans le terrain du Nord de la France. Ann. Soc. Géol. Nord42: 113–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • -----. 1932. Bassin houiller de la Sarre et de la Lorraine. I. Flore fossile, Aléthopteridées. Études Gites Minér. France, fascic. II.

  • Boureau, E. 1951. Sur un nouveauMedullosa du Stéphanien de Rive-de-Gier. Bull. Soc. Géol. France. VI.1: 419–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brongniart, A. 1849. Tableau des genres des végétaux fossiles.

  • Cotta, B. 1832. Die Dendroilthen in Beziehung auf ihren inneren Bau.

  • Delevoryas, T. 1955. The medullosae—structure and relationships. Palaeontographica97: 114–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Fraine, Ethel. 1912. On the structure and affinities ofSutcliffia, in the light of a newly discovered specimen. Ann. Bot.26: 1031–1066.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1914. OnMedullosa centrofilis, a new species ofMedullosa from the Lower Coal Measures. Ann. Bot.28: 251–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goeppert, H. R. 1864–5. Die fossile Flora der Permischen Formation. Palaeontographica12: 1–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— andG. Stenzel. 1882. Die Medulloseae. Eine neue Gruppe der fossilen Cycadeen. Palaeontographica28: 111–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grand’Eury, C. 1877. Mémoire sur flore Carbonifère du Département de la Loire et du centre de la France. Mém. Acad. Sci. Inst. France24: 1–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halle, T. G. 1933. The structure of certain fossil spore-bearing organs believed to belong to the pteridosperms. Kung. Svenska Vetenskapsakad. Handl. III.12(6).

  • Holden, H. S. 1910. Note on a woundedMyeloxylon. New Phytol.9: 253–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskins, J. H., andA. T. Cross. 1946. Studies in the Trigonocarpales. Part II. Taxonomic problems and a revision of the genusPachytesta. Amer. Midl. Nat.36: 331–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jongmans, W. J. 1954. Contribution to the knowledge of the flora of the seam Girondelle (lower part of the Westphalian A) Part I. Geol. Sticht. C, III, 1: no. 4.

  • Kidston, R. 1887. On the fructification of some ferns from the Carboniferous formation. Trans. Royal Soc. Edinburgh33: 137–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1904. On the fructification ofNeuropteris heterophylla Brongniart. Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. London B,197: 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -----. 1911. Les végétaux houillers recueillis dans le Hainaut Belge. Mém. Mus. Roy. Hist. Nat. Belg. 4.

  • Penhallow, D. P. 1897.Myelopteris topekensis, nov. sp. A new Carboniferous plant. Bot. Gaz.23: 15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renault, B. 1876. Étude du genre Myelopteris. Mem. prés. Acad. Sci., Paris II22(10).

  • -----. 1887. Note sur le genreAetheotesta. Mem. Soc. Hist. Nat. Saône-et-Loire.

  • -----. 1893. Bassin houiller et permien d’Autun et d’Épinac. Flore fossile. Études Gîtes Minér. France. Pt. II, fascic. IV (atlas).

  • -----. 1896. Bassin houiller et permien d’Autun et d’Épinac. Flore fossile. Études Gîtes Minér. France, Pt. II, fascic. IV (text).

  • Roberts, D. C., andE. S. Barghoorn. 1952.Medullosa Olseniae: a PermianMedullosa from north central Texas. Harvard Univ. Mus. Leafl.15: 191–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph, K. 1922. Zur Kenntnis des Baues der Medullosen. Beih. Bot. Centralblatt39, Abt. 2: 196–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahni, B. 1948. The Pentoxyleae: a new group of Jurassic gymnosperms from the Rajmahal Hills of India. Bot. Gaz.110: 47–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schenk, A. 1882. ÜberMedullosa elegans. Bot. Jahrb.3: 156–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1889. UeberMedullosa Cotta undTubicaulis Cotta. Abh. König. Sächs. Ges. Wiss.15: 523–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schopf, J. M. 1939a. A new cycadophyte and its relatives. Trans. Ill. State Acad. Sci.31: 107–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1939b.Medullosa distelica, a new species of the anglica group ofMedullosa. Amer. Jour. Bot.26: 196–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1948. Pteridosperm male fructifications: American species ofDolerotheca, with notes regarding certain allied forms. Jour. Paleont.22: 681–724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D. H. 1899. On the structure and affinities of fossil plants from the Palaeozoic rocks. III. OnMedullosa anglica, a new representative of the Cycadofilices. Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. London, B,191: 81–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1906. OnSutcliffia insignis, a new type of Medulloseae from the Lower Coal-Measures. Trans. Linn. Soc. London, II B,7: 45–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -----. 1909. Studies in fossil botany. 2nd ed.

  • —————. 1914. OnMedullosa pusilla. Proc. Royal Soc. London, B.87: 221–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • -----. 1923. Studies in fossil botany. 3rd ed. Vol. II.

  • Sellards, E. H. 1903.Codonotheca, a new type of spore-bearing organ from the Coal Measures. Amer. Jour. Sci. IV.16: 87–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seward, A. C. 1917. Fossil plants. Vol. III.

  • Solms-Laubach, H. Graf zu. 1891. Fossil botany.

  • —————. 1896. Ueber die Seinerzeit von Unger beschreibenen strukturbietenden Pflanzenreste des Unterculm von Saalfeld in Thüringen. Abh. König. Preuss. Geol. Landes.23: 1–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1897. UeberMedullosa Leuckarti. Bot. Zeit.55: 175–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steidtmann, W. E. 1937. A preliminary report on the anatomy and affinities ofMedullosa Noei sp. nov. from the Pennsylvanian of Illinois. Amer. Jour. Bot.24: 124–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1944. The anatomy and affinities ofMedullosa Noei Steidtmann, and associated foliage, roots, and seeds. Univ. Mich., Contr. Mus. Paleont.6: 131–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, W. N. 1951a.Medullosa pandurata sp. nov. from the McLeansboro group of Illinois. Amer. Jour. Bot.38: 709–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1951b. A newPachytesta from the Berryville locality of southeastern Illinois. Amer. Midl. Nat.46: 717–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1954. The structure and affinities ofPachytesta illinoense comb. nov. Amer. Jour. Bot.41: 500–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————— andT. Delevoryas. 1952. Bases for determining relationships among the Medullosaceae. Amer. Jour. Bot.39: 505–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiessen, R. 1920a. Compilation and composition of bituminous coals. Jour. Geol.28: 185–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1920b. Structure in Paleozoic bituminous coals. U. S. Bur. Mines, Bull.117: 1–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, O. andJ. T. Sterzel. 1896. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Medulloseae. Naturwiss. Ges. Chemnitz, Ber.13: 44–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, C. L. 1953. The telome theory. Bot. Rev.19: 417–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worsdell, W. C. 1896. The anatomy of the stem ofMacrozamia compared with that of other genera of the Cycadaceae. Ann. Bot.10: 601–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1898. The comparative anatomy of certain genera of the Cycadaceae. Jour. Linn. Soc.33: 437–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1900. The comparative anatomy of certain species ofEncephalartos. Trans. Linn. Soc. II.5: 445–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1906. The structure and origin of the Cycadaceae. Ann. Bot.20: 129–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeiller, R. 1890. Bassin houiller et permien d’Autun et d’Épinac. Flore fossile. Études Gîtes Minér. France, Pt. I, fascic. II.

  • Zimmermann, W. 1930. Die Phylogenie der Pflanzen.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Much of the preparation of this review paper was undertaken while the junior author was a Rockefeller Fellow in the Natural Sciences of the National Research Council.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stewart, W.N., Delevoryas, T. The medullosan pteridosperms. Bot. Rev 22, 45–80 (1956). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02872456

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02872456

Keywords

Navigation