Log in

Growth characteristics of aquatic macrophytes cultured in nutrient-enriched water: I. Water hyacinth, water lettuce, and pennywort

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Seasonal growth characteristics and biomass yield potential of 3 floating aquatic macrophytes cultured in nutrient nonlimiting conditions were evaluated in central Florida’s climatic conditions. Growth cycle (growth curve) of the plants was found to be complete when maximum plant density was reached and no additional increase in growth was recorded. Biomass yield per unit area and time was found to be maximum in the linear phase of the growth curve; plant density in this phase was defined as “operational plant density,” a density range in which a biomass production system is operated to obtain the highest possible yields. Biomass yields were found to be 106, 72, and41 t(drywt)ha-1yr-1, respectively, for water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes), water lettuce (Pistia stratiotes), and pennywort (Hydrocotyle umbellata). Operational plant density was found to be in the range of 500–2,000 g dry wt m-2 for water hyacinth, 200–700 g dry wt m-2 for water lettuce, and 250–650 g dry wt m-2 for pennywort. Seasonality was observed in growth rates but not in operational plant density. Specific growth rate (% increase per day) was found to maximum at low plant densities and decreased as the plant density increased. Results show that water hyacinth and water lettuce can be successfully grown for a period of about 10 mo, while pennywort, a cool season plant, can be integrated into water hyacinth/water lettuce biomass production system to obtain high yields in the winter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • A.P.H.A. 1971. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 13th ed. Amer. Publ. Health Assoc, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagnall, L. O. 1980. Water hyacinth energy aquaculture. Presented at 1980 summer meetings, Amer. Soc. Agric. Engin. p. 20. ASAE Paper No. 80-5042. St. Joseph, MI.

  • Boyd, C. E. 1969. The nutritive value of three species of water weeds. Econ. Bot. 23: 123–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1976. Accumulation of dry matter, nitrogen, and phosphorus by cultivated water hyacinth. Econ. Bot. 30: 51–56.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Center, T. D., and N. R. Spencer. 1981. The phenology and growth of water hyacinth(Eichhornia crassipes [Mart] Solms) in a eutrophic northcentral Florida lake. Aquatic Bot. 10: 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell, D. A., J. Zoltek, Jr., C. D. Patrinely, T. des Furman, and J. I. Kim. 1977. Nutrient removal by water hyacinths. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 49: 57–65.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DeBusk, T. A., J. H. Ryther, M. D. Hanisak, and L. D. Williams. 1981. Effects of seasonality and plant density on the productivity of some freshwater macrophytes. Aquatic Bot. 10: 133–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D. O. 1980. Biological and agricultural systems: An overview.In Biochemical and Photosynthetic Aspects of Energy Production, ed, A. San Pietro, p. 1–30. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, G. A. 1980. Marine biomass production through seaweed aquaculture.In Biochemical and Photosynthetic Aspects of Energy Production, ed, A. San Pietro, p. 31–58. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knipling, E. D., S. H. West, and W. T. Haller. 1970. Growth characteristics, yield potential, and nutritive content of water hyacinth. Proc. Soil & Crop Soc. Florida 30: 51–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, K. R., D. L. Sutton, and G. E. Bowes. 1983. Biomass production of freshwater aquatic plants in Florida. Proc. Soil & Crop Soc. Florida 42: 28–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, P. D. Sacco, D. A. Graetz, K. L. Campbell, and L. R. Sinclair. 1982. Water treatment by an aquatic ecosystem: Nutrient removal by reservoirs and flooded fields. Environ. Mgt. 6: 261–271.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, S. C, and T. A. DeBusk. 1981. Productivity and nutritive value ofPistia stratiotes andEichhornia crassipes. J. Aquatic PL Mgt. 19: 61–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolverton, B. C, and R. C. McDonald. 1979. Water hyacinth(Eichhornia crassipes) productivity and harvesting studies. Econ. Bot. 33: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yount, J. L., and R. Crossman. 1970. Eutrophication control by plant harvesting. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 42: 173–183.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reddy, K.R., Debusk, W.F. Growth characteristics of aquatic macrophytes cultured in nutrient-enriched water: I. Water hyacinth, water lettuce, and pennywort. Econ Bot 38, 229–239 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02858838

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02858838

Keywords

Navigation