Log in

Conflicts between activist research and academic success: Participatory research and alternative strategies

  • Published:
The American Sociologist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article compares participatory research and alternative activist approaches, based on the literature on participatory research and interviews with nine successful sociologists who use alternative approaches. Participatory research, distinguished by high control over research by community members, equalizes power within the research process, but often retards academic publication and career advancement. The interviews show that successful academics retain control over their research, experience mild to severe conflicts with departments, and develop various strategies for combining activism and career success. All types of activist research are more effective in challenging inequality if they involve activist community organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown, L. David, and Rajesh Tandon. 1983. “The Ideology and Political Economy of Inquiry: Action Research and Participatory Research.”The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science and Technology: An International Perspective 19: 277–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cancian, Francesca M. 1992. “Feminist Science: Methodologies that Challenge Inequality.”Gender & Society, in press.

  • Cancian, Francesca, and Cathleen Armstead., 1992. “Participatory Research.” InEncyclopedia of Sociology, edited by Edgar and Marie Borgatta. NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesler, Mark A. 1991. “Participatory Action Research with Self-Help Groups: An Alternative Paradigm for Inquiry and Action.”American Journal of Community Psychology 19: 757–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Patricia Hill. 1990.Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. Boston: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, Keith. 1989. “An Uncomplicated Democratic Demand? Local Research Activities with Trade Unions.” InContemporary Ergonomics, edited by E.D. Megaw. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, Keith and Kevin Ward. 1989. “The Potential and Limitations: Participatory Research in a University Context.” Paper presented at Participatory Research Conference, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada, July 12–15.

  • Freeman, Howard, R. Dynes, P. Rossi and W. Whyte (eds.) 1983.Applied Sociology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, Paulo. 1970.Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, Jan and Elizabeth Clark (eds.). 1989.The Development of Clinical and Applied Sociology: Sociological Practice 7. (special issue)

  • Gaventa, John. 1988. “Participatory Research in North America.”Convergence 21: 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaventa, John & Billy Horton. 1975. “A Citizen’s Research Project in Appalachia, U.S.A.”Convergence 14: 30–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, Sandra. 1991.Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasenfeld, Yeheskel, and Mark A. Chesler. 1989. “Client Empowerment in the Human Services: Personal and Professional Agenda.”The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 25: 499–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huizer, Gerrit, and Bruce Mannheim (eds.). 1979.The Politics of Anthropology: From Colonialism and Sexism Toward a View from Below. Paris: Mouton Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, Kurt. 1946. “Action Research and Minority Problems.”Journal of Social Issues 4: 34–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, Patricia. 1987.Doing Participatory Research: A Feminist Approach. Amherst, MA: The Center for International Education, School of Education, Univ. of Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, Karl. 1936.Ideology and Utopia. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mies, Maria. 1983. “Towards a Methodology for Feminist Research.” InTheories of Women’s Studies, edited by Gloria Bowles and Renate Duelli-Klein. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, Peter. 1978. “Social Research and Radical Change.” Presentation at the 9th World Congress of Sociology, Uppsala, Sweden.

  • Park, Peter, Budd Hall, Ted Jackson, and Mary Brydon-Miller (eds.). In press.Knowledge and Social Change: Participatory Research in North America. S. Hadley, MA: Bergin and Garvey.

  • Reason, Peter and John Rowan (eds.). 1981.Human Inquiry: A Sourcebook of New Paradigm Research. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tandon, Rajesh. 1981. “Participatory Research in the Empowerment of People.”Convergence 14: 20–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tandon, Rajesh. 1988. “Social Transformation and Participatory Research.”Convergence 21: 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichy, N. and S. Friedman. 1983. “Institutional Dynamics of Action Research.” InProducing Useful Information for Organizations, edited by R. Kilman and C. Thomas. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, William Foote. 1991.Participatory Action Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Her research has focused on family, gender, and feminist and participatory methods. Recent publications includeLove in America, “Feminist Science,” and “Participatory Research” with Cathleen Armstead. Her current participatory research project explores “Family and Community Caring” in a Mexican-American community. Address for correspondence: Francesca M. Cancian, University of CA, Dept. of Sociology, Irvine, CA 92717.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cancian, F.M. Conflicts between activist research and academic success: Participatory research and alternative strategies. Am Soc 24, 92–106 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02691947

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02691947

Keywords

Navigation