Log in

Influence of carbon content and ferrite morphology on the sensitization of duplex stainless steel

  • Published:
Metallurgical Transactions A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The influence of ferrite morphology and carbon content on the intergranular corrosion behavior of 308 stainless steel was investigated using four wrought alloys and six weld deposited alloys. The four wrought alloys were heat treated at four different annealing temperatures to introduce four different amounts of ferrite. The annealed samples along with the weld deposited alloys were aged at temperatures ranging from 480 to 700°C for times varying between 15 min and 1000 h and then tested for intergranular corrosion susceptibility in acidified copper-copper sulfate solution. For a given carbon content there exists a critical amount and distribution of α-γ boundary area above which the alloy is immune and below which it is susceptible to intergranular corrosion. For amounts and distributions of α-γ boundary area less than the critical value two types of sensitization behavior are possible. First, there may be a sufficient amount and distribution of α-γ boundary area to insure rapid healing of the sensitized microstructure. Second, there may be an inadequate amount or distribution of α-γ boundary area to produce either immunity or rapid healing and the alloy behaves as a fully austenitic alloy regardless of the amount of ferrite present. A model is presented which describes as a function of carbon content the critical amounts and distributions of α-γ boundary area required for rapid healing and immunity to sensitization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Payson:Trans. AIME, 1932, vol. 100, p. 306.

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. B. Pfeil and D. G. Jones:J. Iron Steel Inst. London, 1933, vol. 128, p. 337.

    Google Scholar 

  3. V. R. Scherer, G. Riedrich, and G. Hoch:Arch. Eisenhu ie800-14 ttenwes., 1939, vol. 13, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  4. W. L. Walker: Report No. PME 77-S09-103, November, 1977 and Report No. PME 78-509-73, May, 1978, General Electric Co., Nuclear Energy Division, San Jose, CA; N. R. Hughes: Report No. PME 79-688-37, April, 1979, General Electric Co., Nuclear Energy Division, San Jose, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  5. T. M. Devine:Corrosion 78, p. 189, National Association of Corrosion Engineers, Houston, TX, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Viswanathan, J. I. Nurminen, R. G. Aspden:Weld. J., 1979, vol. 58, p. 1185.

    Google Scholar 

  7. F. R. Beckitt:J. Iron Steel Inst. London, 1969, vol. 207, p. 632.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. T. M. Devine:J. Electrochem. Soc., 1979, vol. 126, p. 374.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. ASTM Designation: A262-70 practice E.

  10. “WRC Development Program for Standard Weld Metal Sample Preparation Procedures”, Advisory Subcommittee for Welding Stainless Steels, High Alloys Committee, Welding Research Council, United Engineering Building, 345 East 47th Street, New York, NY, December 1972.

  11. P. G. Shewman:Diffusion in Solids, p. 18, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. Tuma, P. Groiner, and K. Lobl:Arch. Eisenhu ie800-15 ttenwes., 1969, vol. 40, p. 727.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. M. F. Henry: Unpublished research, Corporate Research and Development, General Electric Company, Schenectady, NY, 1979.

  14. L. H. VanVlack:Materials Science for Engineers, p. 169, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, MA, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  15. E. E. Underwood:Quantitative Microscopy, R. T. DeHoff and F. N. Rhines, eds., p. 77, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Gurland:Quantitative Microscopy, op. Cit., p. 77, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1968, p. 278.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Metals Handbook, vol. 8, p. 402, American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1973.

  18. K. Osozawa, K. Bohnenkamp, and H. J. Engell:Corros. Sci., 1966, vo. 6, p. 421.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. C. S. Tedmon, D. A. Vermilyea, and J. H. Rosolowski:J. Electrochem. Soc., 1971, vol 118, p. 192.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. C. Stawström and M. Hillert:J. Iron Steel Inst. London, 1969, vol. 207, p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  21. T. M. Devine: Unpublished research, 1979, Corporate Research and Development Center, General Electric Company, Schenectady, New York, 12301.

  22. H. D. Solomon and T. M. Devine: MiCon 78: Optimization of Processing, Properties, and Service Performance Through Microstructural Control, ASTM STP672, H. Abrams, G. N. Maniar, D. A. Nail, and H. D. Solomon, eds., pp. 430–61, American Society for Testing and Materials, 1979.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Devine, T.M. Influence of carbon content and ferrite morphology on the sensitization of duplex stainless steel. Metall Trans A 11, 791–800 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02661208

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02661208

Keywords

Navigation