Log in

Oxidative stability of soybean oils with altered fatty acid compositions

  • Published:
Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society

Abstract

The oxidative stabilities of one canola oil and six soybean oils of various fatty acid compositions were compared in terms of peroxide values, conjugated dienoic acid values and sensory evaluations. Two of the soybean oils (Hardin and BSR 101) were from common commercial varieties. The other four soybean oils were from experimental lines developed in a mutation breeding program at Iowa State University that included A17 with 1.5% linolenate and 15.2% palmitate; A16 with 2% linolenate and 10.8% palmitate; A87-191039 with 2% linolenate and 29.6% oleate; and A6 with 27.5% stearate. Seed from the soybean genotypes was cold pressed. Crude canola oil was obtained without additives. All oils were refined, bleached and deodorized under laboratory conditions with no additives and stored at 60°C for 15 days. The A17, A16, A87-191039 and A6 oils were generally more stable to oxidation than the commercial soybean varieties and canola oil as evaluated by chemical and sensory tests. Canola oil was much less stable than Hardin and BSR 101 oils by both chemical and sensory tests. The peroxide values and flavor scores of oils were highly correlated with the initial amounts of linolenate (r=0.95, P=0.001). Flavor quality and flavor intensity had negative correlations with linolenate, (r=−0.89, P=0.007) and (r=−0.86, P=0.013), respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Frankel, E.N.,J. Sci. Food Agric. 54:495 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Frankel, E.N., inFlavor Chemistry of Fats and Oils, edited by D.B. Min, and T.H. Smouse, American Oil Chemists’ Society, Champaign, IL, 1985, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Grosch, W., inAutoxidation of Unsaturated Lipids, edited by H.W.S. Chan, Academic Press, London, 1987, p. 95.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gunstone, F.D., and T.P. Hilditch,J. Chem. Soc. 1945:836 (1945).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Durkee, M.M.,Ind. Eng. Chem. 28:898 (1936).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schwab, A.W., H.A. Moser, P.A. Cooney and C.D. Evans,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 27:314 (1950).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dutton, H.J., C.R. Lancaster, C.D. Evans and J.C. Cowan, Ibid.:115 (1951).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Evans, C.D., R.E. Beal, D.G. McConnell, L.T. Black and J.C. Cowan, Ibid.:60 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Frankel, E.N.,Prog. Lipid Res. 22:1 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dutton, H.J.,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 58:234 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Graef, G.L., W.R. Fehr, L.A. Miller, E.G. Hammond and S.R. Cianzio,Crop Sci. 28:55 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hammond, E.G., and W.R. Fehr, inBiotechnology for the Oils and Fats Industry, edited by J.B.M. Rattray, and C. Ratledge, American Oil Chemists’ Society, Champaign, 1984, p. 89.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wilcox, J.R., and J.F. Cavins,Theor. Appl. Genet. 71:74 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Official and Tentative Methods of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, 3rd edn., edited by R.C. Walker, American Oil Chemists’ Chemists’ Society, Champaign, 1983.

  15. Stone, R.R., and E.G. Hammond,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 60:1277 (1983).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Frankel, E.N.,Prog. Lipid Res. 19:1 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Min, D.B., and M.Y. Jung, inFlavor Chemistry of Lipid Foods, edited by D.B. Min, and T.H. Smouse, American Oil Chemists’ Society, Champaign, 1989, p. 242.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Neumann, M.M., S.N. Fusero and N.A. Garcia,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 68:662 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hamm, D.L., E.G. Hammond, V. Parvanah and H.E. Snyder, Ibid.:920 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Metcalfe, L.D., A.A. Schmitz and J.R. Pelka,Anal. Chem. 28:514 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Manual on Sensory Testing Methods, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1968, STP 434.

  22. Warner, K., inFlavor Chemistry of Fats and Oils, edited by D.B. Min, and T.H. Smouse, American Oil Chemists’ Society, Champaign, 1985, p. 207.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Montgomery, D.C., inDesign and Analysis of Experiments, 2nd edn., edited by D.C. Montgomery, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1984, p. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Howell, R.W., and F.I. Collins,Agron. J. 49:593 (1957).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Chu, W.S., and V.L. Sheldon,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 56:71 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Miller, L.A., and P.J. White, Ibid.:1324 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. White, P.J., and L.A. Miller, Ibid.:1334 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Moser, H.A., C.D. Evans, G. Mustakas and J.C. Cowan Ibid.:811 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. St. Angelo, A.J., R.L. Ory and L.E. Brown, Ibid.:34 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, HR., White, P.J. Oxidative stability of soybean oils with altered fatty acid compositions. J Am Oil Chem Soc 69, 528–532 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02636103

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02636103

Key words

Navigation