Log in

LC-MS-MS experiences with internal standards

  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Over the years of chromatographic evolution, the purpose of using internal standards for quantitative determinations in bioanalysis has shifted from covering (correcting for) random and systematic errors of the entire method (including sample preparation, chromatography and detection) to currently covering (correcting for) random and systematic errors of the detection, by MS-MS especially. However, the need for internal standards in current LC-MS-MS is also dependent on the degree of chromatographic separation and the degree of sample clean-up. This emphasizes the need for integrated method development, including selection of an internal standard. Available options for internal standard selection are (1) no internal standard, (2) a structurally related compound, (3) a structurally similar compound or (4) a stable isotope labelled compound. An overview of the purposes of internal standards in bioanalytical LC-MS-MS is given and this overview is supported by various illustrations using different types of internal standards.

An overview of the purposes of internal standards in bioanalytical LC-MS-MS is given. It is supported by various illustrations using different types of internal standards.

The option of using deuterated internal standards has given us surprising results in some cases, where chromatographic and/or extraction behaviour of deuterated internal standards was different from the analyte.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Curry, S.H.; Whelpton, R. inBlood Drugs and Other Analytical Challenges (Vol. 7, Methodological Surveys), Reid, E., Ed., Horwood/Wiley, Chichester,1978, 29–41.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Reid, E., as for [1], 61–76.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vessman, J. inTrace-organic Sample Handling (Vol. 10, Methodological Surveys; now out-of-print), as for [1],1981, 341–347.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dudley, K. H. as for [3], 336–340.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wieling, J.; Dijkstra, H.; Mensink, C.K.; Jonkman, J.H.G.; Coenegracht P.M.J.; Doornbos, D.A.J. Chromatogr. 1993,629, 181–199.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Matuszewski, B.K.; Constanzer, M.L.; Chavez-Eng, C.M.Anal. Chem. 1998,70 (5) 882–889.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lagerwerf, F.M.; van Dongen, W. D.; Steenvoorden, R.J.J.M.; Honing, M.; Jonkman, J.H.G.Trends in Analytical Chemistry 2000,19 (7), 418–427.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hempenius, J.; Steenvoorden, R.J.J.M.; Lagerwerf, F.M.; Wieling, J.; Jonkman J.H.G.J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 1999,Sep. 20 (6), 889–98. cf. Wieling, J.; Hempenius, J.; Steenvoorden, R.J.J.M.; Jonkman, J.H.G.Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Laboratory Automation and Robotics October 18–21,1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wieling, J. LC-MS-MS experiences with internal standards. Chromatographia 55 (Suppl 1), S107–S113 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02493365

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02493365

Key Words

Navigation