Abstract
Two well-known lower bounds to the reliability in classical test theory, Guttman's λ2 and Cronbach's coefficient alpha, are shown to be terms of an infinite series of lower bounds. All terms of this series are equal to the reliability if and only if the test is composed of items which are essentially tau-equivalent. Some practical examples, comparing the first 7 terms of the series, are offered. It appears that the second term (λ2) is generally worth-while computing as an improvement of the first term (alpha) whereas going beyond the second term is not worth the computational effort. Possibly an exception should be made for very short tests having widely spread absolute values of covariances between items. The relationship of the series and previous work on lower bound estimates for the reliability is briefly discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cronbach, L. J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.Psychometrika 1951,16, 297–334.
Guttman, L. A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability.Psychometrika 1945,10, 255–282.
Jackson, P. H. & Agunwamba, C. C. Lower bounds for the reliability of the total score on a test composed of nonhomogeneous items: I. Algebraic lower bounds.Psychometrika, 1977,42, 567–578.
Kuder, G. F. & Richardson, M. W. The theory of the estimation of test reliability.Psychometrika, 1937,2, 151–160.
Lord, F. M. & Novick, M. R.Statistical theories of mental test scores; Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1974.
Woodhouse, B. & Jackson, P. H. Lower bounds for the reliability of the total score on a test composed of nonhomogeneous items: II. A search procedure to locate the greatest lower bound.Psychometrika, 1977,42, 579–591.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authors are obliged to Henk Camstra for providing a computer program that was used in this study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
ten Berge, J.M.F., Zegers, F.E. A series of lower bounds to the reliability of a test. Psychometrika 43, 575–579 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293815
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293815