Log in

Bases of power in relation to leader behavior: A field investigation

  • Full Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hypotheses addressing the relationships between bases of power and transformational and transactional leadership, and propositions concerning the extent to which perceptions of leader power and behavior were shared by a leader's followers, were addressed in this study. Two hundred eighty employees reporting to 118 supervisors in 45 organizations provided data for the investigation. Results provided support for hypothesized relationships between personal power and transformational leadership as well as between positional power and transactional leadership. In addition, ratings of both leader power and leader behavior were found to be individually-based phenomena; that is, followers of a focal leader did not share perceptions about that leader's power or behavior. Implications for managerial practice and future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ansari, M. (1990).Managing people at work: Leadership styles and influence strategies. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B., & Bass, B. (1988). Transformational leadership, charisma and beyond. In J. G. Hunt, B. R. Baliga, H. P. Dachler, & C. A. Schriesheim (Eds.),Emerging leadership vistas (pp. 29–50). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B., & Yammarino, F. (1990). Operationalizing charismatic leadership using a levels of analysis framework.Leadership Quarterly, 1, 3, 193–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B., Yammarino, F., & Bass, B. (1991). Identifying common methods variance with data collected from a single source: An unresolved sticky issue.Journal of Management, 17, 3, 571–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. (1985).Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. (1990).Bass and Stogdill's handbook of leadership. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B., & Avolio, B. (1990).The multifactor leadership questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B.M., Waldman, D.A., Avolio, B.J., & Bebb, M. (1987). Transformational leadership and the falling dominoes effect.Group and Organization Studies, 12, 73–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calder, B. (1977). An attribution theory of leadership. In B. Staw and G. Salancik (Eds.),New directions in organizational behavior. Chicago: St. Clair Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conger, J., & Kanungo, R. (1987). Toward a behavioral theory of charismatic leadership in organizational settings.Academy of Management Review, 12, 4, 637–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. (1957). The concept of power.Behavioral Science, 2, 201–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dansereau, F., Alutto, J., & Yammarino, F. (1984).Theory testing in organizational behavior: The variant approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dansereau, F., Graen, G., & Haga, W. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role-making process.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 45–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, J., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.),Studies in social power. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graen, G., & Cashman, J. (1975). A role-making model of leadership in organizations: A developmental approach. In J. G. Hunt & L. L. Larson (Eds.),Leadership frontiers. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, C., & Podsakoff, P. (1981). Effects of withdrawal of a performance-contingent reward on supervisory influence and power.Academy of Management Journal, 24, 527–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinkin, T., & Schriesheim, C. (1989). Development and application of new scales to measure the French and Raven (1959) bases of social power.Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 4, 561–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinkin, T., & Schriesheim, C. (1990). Relationships between subordinate perceptions of supervisor influence tactics and attributed bases of supervisory power.Human Relations, 43, 3, 221–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, E. (1985). Leadership and power. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.),Handbook of social psychology. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, E., & Julian, J. (1970). Studies in leader legitimacy, influence, and motivation. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 5) (pp. 33–69). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R. (1977). A 1976 theory of charismatic leadership. In J. G. Hunt and L.L. Larson (Eds.),Leadership: The cutting edge. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R., Spangler, W., & Woycke, J. (1991). Personality and charisma in the U.S. Presidency: A psychological theory of leader effectiveness.Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 364–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinger, G. (1959). The development of perceptions and behavior in newly formed social power relationships. In D. Cartwright (Eds.),Studies in social power (pp. 83–98). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, R. (1977). Functional leadership behavior: Measurement and relation to social power and leadership perceptions.Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 114–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, R., Foti, R., & DeVader, C. (1984). A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing and leadership perception.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 343–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markham, S. (1988). Pay for performance dilemma revisited: Empirical example of the importance of group effects.Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 172–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markham, S. & McKee, G. (1991). Declining organization size and increased unemployment rates: Predicting absenteeism from a within and between plant perspective.Academy of Management Journal, 34, 952–965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, T., & Hunt, J. (1980). Social influence and intent to leave: A path-analytic process model.Personnel Psychology, 33, 505–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palich, L., & Hom, P. (1992). The impact of leader power and behavior on leadership perceptions.Group and Organization Management, 17, 3, 279–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P., & Schriesheim, C. (1985). Field studies of French and Raven's bases of power: Critique, reanalyses and suggestions for future research.Psychological Bulletin, 97, 3, 387–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P., & Organ, D. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research. Problems and prospects.Journal of Management, 12, 531–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, H.P. (1977). The leader as manager of reinforcement contingencies: An empirical example and a model. In J.G. Hunt and L.L. Larson (Eds.),Leadership: The cutting edge. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stogdill, R., & Coons, A. (1957).Leader behavior: Its description and measurement. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szilagyi, A. (1980). Causal inferences between leader reward behavior and subordinate performance, absenteeism, and work satisfaction.Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53, 195–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yammarino, F., & Bass, B. (1990). Transformational leadership and multiple levels of analysis.Human Relations, 43, 975–995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yammarino, F., & Dubinsky, A. (1992). Superior-subordinate relationships: A multiple levels of analysis approach.Human Relations, 45, 575–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yammarino, F., Dubinsky, A., & Hartley, S. (1987). An approach for assessing individual versus group effects in performance evaluations.Journal of Occupational Psychology, 60, 157–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yammarino, F., & Markham, S. (1992). On the application of within and between analysis: Are absence and affect really group-based phenomena?Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 168–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. (1989).Leadership in Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G., & Falbe, C. (1991). The importance of different power sources in downward and lateral relations.Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 3, 416–423.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We thank Bruce Avolio, Bernard Bass, and Gary Yukl for their helpful comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Atwater, L.E., Yammarino, F.J. Bases of power in relation to leader behavior: A field investigation. J Bus Psychol 11, 3–22 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02278251

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02278251

Keywords

Navigation