Log in

Double-blind crossover study of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patients with fecal incontinence not amenable to simple repair may have to undergo major reconstructive surgery or resort to a stoma. Sacral nerve stimulation is an alternative approach that may diminish incontinence by altering sphincter and rectal motor function. This study is the first double-blind trial examining the effectiveness of this therapy. METHODS: Two patients with passive fecal incontinence who had been implanted for nine months with a permanent sacral nerve stimulator and electrode were studied using fecal incontinence diaries, anorectal physiological tests, and quality-of-life assessments (SF-36 health survey). The trial period consisted of two two-week periods, with the stimulator turned on for two weeks and off for two weeks. The main investigator and the patients were blinded to the status of the stimulator. RESULTS: There was a dramatic difference between the number and severity of episodes of incontinence when the stimulator was turned onvs. turned off (Patient 1, 20vs. 2 episodes; Patient 2, 4vs. 0 episodes; offvs. on). There was an increase in squeeze pressure (Patient 1, 70vs. 100 cm H2O; Patient 2, 60vs. 90 cm H2O; offvs. on), with moderate increases in resting pressure and rectal threshold and urge volumes. Quality-of-life measurements showed a marked improvement prestimulationvs. nine months after permanent stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: There is a marked, unequivocal improvement in symptoms of fecal incontinence with sacral nerve stimulation shown in this double-blind crossover trial. Sacral nerve stimulation improves the quality of life in selected patients with fecal incontinence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Engel AF, Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Bartram CI, Nicholls RJ. Anterior sphincter repair for patients with obstetric trauma. Br J Surg 1994;81:1231–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA, Bartram CI. Primary degeneration of the internal anal sphincter as a cause of passive faecal incontinence. Lancet 1997;347:612–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Williams NS, Patel J, George BD,et al. Development of an electrically stimulated neoanal sphincter. Lancet 1991;338:1166–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Baeten C, Geerdes BP, Adang EM,et al. Anal dynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of intractable fecal incontinence. N Engl J Med 1995;332:1600–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lehur P-A, Michot F, Denis P,et al. Results of artificial sphincter in severe anal incontinence: report of 14 consecutive implantations. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:1352–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bosch JL, Groen J. Sacral (S3) segmental nerve stimulation as a treatment for urge incontinence in patients with detrusor instability: results of chronic electrical stimulation using an implantable neural prosthesis. J Urol 1995;154:504–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hassouna MM, Elhilali MM. Role of the sacral root stimulator in voiding dysfunction. World J Urol 1991;9:145–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Thon WF, Baskin LS, Jonas U, Tanagho EA, Schmidt RA. Neuromodulation of voiding dysfunction and pelvic pain. World J Urol 1991;9:138–41.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Matzel KE, Stadelmaier U, Hohenfeller M, Gall FP. Electrical stimulation of spinal nerves for treatment of faecal incontinence. Lancet 1995;346:1124–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA, Turner I, Nicholls RJ, Woloszko J. Effects of short term sacral nerve stimulation on anal and rectal function in patients with anal incontinence. Gut 1999;44:407–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Engel A, Kamm M, Talbot I. Progressive systemic sclerosis of the internal anal sphincter leading to passive faecal incontinence. Gut 1994;35:857–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vaizey CJ, Carapetti E, Cahill J, Kamm MA. Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut 1999;44:77–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Neill ME, Parks AG, Swash M. Physiology studies of the pelvic floor in idiopathic faecal incontinence and rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1981;68:531–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kamm MA, Lennard-Jones JE. Rectal mucosal electrosensory testing—evidence for a rectal sensory neuropathy in idiopathic constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:419–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

A grant and all the equipment used in this study were supplied by Medtronic INTERSTIM™, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

About this article

Cite this article

Vaizey, C.J., Kamm, M.A., Roy, A.J. et al. Double-blind crossover study of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 43, 298–302 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02258292

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02258292

Key words

Navigation