Abstract
In the present study, the abilities of NPA (a direct DA receptor agonist) and amphetamine (an indirect DA receptor agonist) to induce short- and long-term behavioral sensitization were assessed in 11- and 17-day-old rats (age at initial injection). Rats were injected on 4 consecutive days with amphetamine (1.0, 2.5, or 5.0 mg/kg), NPA (1.0 mg/kg), or saline. A final test day occurred either 2 days (experiment 1) or 8 days (experiment 2) later. On the test day, rats given successive agonist injections received a single injection of the same agonist again; whereas rats given successive saline injections received either amphetamine or NPA for the first time. Five minutes after injection, locomotor activity (line-crosses), stereotyped sniffing, and vertical activity were measured during a 30-min testing session. The results showed that 11- and 17-day-old rats exhibited behavioral sensitization when tested with NPA or amphetamine after a 2-day interval. In contrast, neither NPA nor amphetamine was able to sensitize the behaviors of preweanling rats when measured 8 days after initial drug treatments. Therefore, these results show that both direct and indirect DA agonists are able to induce short-term behavioral sensitization in preweanling rats, but that the mechanisms responsible for mediating long-term behavioral sensitization have not yet matured.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Castro R, Abreu P, Calzadilla CH, Rodriguez M (1985) Increased or decreased locomotor response in rats following repeated administration of apomorphine depends on dosage interval. Psychopharmacology 85:333–339
Conklin P, Heggeness FW (1971) Maturation of temperature homeostasis in the rat. Am J Physiol 220:333–336
Curet O, De Montigny C, Blier P (1992) Effect of desipramine and amphetamine on noradrenergic neurotransmission: electrophysiological studies in rat brain. Eur J Pharmacol 221:59–70
Drew KL, Glick SD (1989) Environment-dependent sensitization to amphetamine-induced circling behavior. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 31:705–708
Fitzgerald LW, Hannigan JH (1989) Cholinergic maturation and SCH 23390-induced catalepsy in the male rat pup. Dev Brain Res 47:147–150
Fujiwara Y, Kazahaya Y, Nakashima M, Sato M, Otsuki S (1987) Behavioral sensitization in the rat: an ontogenic study. Psychopharmacology 91:316–319
Hoffman DC, Wise RA (1992) The locomotor-activating effects of the D2 agonist bromocriptine show environment-specific sensitization following repeated injections. Psychopharmacology 107:277–284
Homan HD, Ziance RJ (1981) The effects ofd-amphetamine and potassium on serotonin release and metabolism in rat cerebral cortex tissue. Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol 31:223–240
Kalivas PW, Duffy P (1990) Effect of acute and daily cocaine treatment on extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens. Synapse 5:48–58
Kalivas PW, Stewart J (1991) Dopamine transmission in the initiation and expression of drug- and stress-induced sensitization of motor activity. Brain Res Rev 16:223–244
Karler R, Calder LD, Turkanis SA (1991) DNQX blockade of amphetamine behavioral sensitization. Brain Res 552:295–300
Kolta MG, Scalzo FM, Ali SF, Holson RR (1990) Ontogeny of the enhanced behavioral response to amphetamine in amphetamine-pretreated rats. Psychopharmacology 100:377–382
Leith NJ, Kuczenski R (1982) Two dissociable components of behavioral sensitization following repeated amphetamine administration. Psychopharmacology 76:310–315
Mattingly BA, Gotsick JE (1989) Conditioning and experiential factors affecting the development of sensitization to apomorphine. Behav Neurosci 103:1311–1317
Mattingly BA, Gotsick JE, Salamanca K (1988) Latent sensitization to apomorphine following repeated low doses. Behav Neurosci 102:553–558
Mattingly BA, Rowlett JK, Graff JT, Hatton BJ (1991) Effects of selective D1 and D2 dopamine antagonists on the development of behavioral sensitization to apomorphine. Psychopharmacology 105:501–507
McDougall SA, Arnold TF, Nonneman AJ (1990) Ontogeny of locomotor activity and grooming in the young rat: role of D1 and D2 receptors. Eur J Pharmacol 186:223–230
McDougall SA, Crawford CA, Nonneman AJ (1992) Effects of irreversible dopamine receptor inactivation on locomotor activity and grooming in the 17- and 90-day-old rat. Psychopharmacology 106:502–510
Meller E, Bohmaker K, Namba Y, Friedhoff AJ, Goldstein M (1987) Relationship between receptor occupancy and response at striatal autoreceptors. Mol Pharmacol 31:592–598
Moody CA, Spear LP (1992) Ontogenetic differences in the psychopharmacological responses to separate and combined stimulation of D1 and D2 dopamine receptors during the neonatal to weanling age period. Psychopharmacology 106:161–168
Parker EM, Cubeddu LX (1986) Effects ofd-amphetamine and dopamine synthesis inhibitors on dopamine and acetylcholine neurotransmission in the striatum. I. Release in the absence of vesicular transmitter stores. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 237:179–192
Robinson TE, Becker JB (1986) Enduring changes in brain and behavior produced by chronic amphetamine administration: a review and evaluation of animal models of amphetamine psychosis. Brain Res Rev 11:157–198
Rowlett JK, Mattingly BA, Bardo MT (1991) Neurochemical and behavioral effects of acute and chronic treatment with apomorphine in rats. Neuropharmacology 30:191–197
Seeman P, Grigoriadis D (1987) Dopamine receptors in brain and periphery. Neurochem Int 10:1–25
Shalaby IA, Spear LP (1980) Psychopharmacological effects of low and high doses of apomorphine during ontogeny. Eur J Pharmacol 67:451–459
Spear LP (1979) The use of psychopharmacological procedures to analyze the ontogeny of learning and retention: issues and concerns. In: Spear NE, Campbell BA (eds) Ontogeny of learning and memory. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., pp. 135–156
Steketee JD, Striplin CD, Murray TF, Kalivas PW (1991) Possible role for G-proteins in behavioral sensitization to cocaine. Brain Res 545:287–291
Stewart J, Druhan JP (1993) Development of both conditioning and sensitization of the behavioral activating effects of amphetamine is blocked by the non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist, MK-801. Psychopharmacology 110:125–132
Vaughn DM, Severson JA, Woodward JJ, Randall PK, Riffee WH, Leslie SW, Wilcox RE (1990) Behavioral sensitization following subchronic apomorphine treatment — possible neurochemical basis. Brain Res 499:108–120
Wilcox RE, Riffee WH, Chen P-C, Hammet S, Smith RV (1980) Behavioral facilitation following chronic administration ofN-n-propylnorapomorphine. Psychopharmacology 72:113–115
Wolf ME, White FJ, Nassar R, Brooderson RJ, Khansa MR (1993) Differential development of autoreceptor subsensitivity and enhanced dopamine release during amphetamine sensitization. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 264:249–255
Zetterstrom T, Sharp T, Marsden CA, Ungerstedt U (1983) In vivo measurements of dopamine and its metabolites by intracerebral dialysis: changes afterd-amphetamine. J Neurochem 41:1769–1773
Zolman JF, McDougall SA (1983) Young precocial birds: animal models for developmental neurobehavioural research. Bird Behav 5:31–58
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McDougall, S.A., Duke, M.A., Bolanos, C.A. et al. Ontogeny of behavioral sensitization in the rat: effects of direct and indirect dopamine agonists. Psychopharmacology 116, 483–490 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02247482
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02247482