Abstract
Genomic DNA fragments generated by the reverse transcription of cellular RNA are called retroposons. Because they are flanked by short repeats, mammalian retroposons are believed to integrate at staggered chromosomal breaks. Recently, a significant sequence pattern associated with the integration of Alu and ID repeats was identified (Jurka 1996). It is represented by the 5′ TTAAAA consensus sequence around the 5′ ends of flanking repeats of Alu, ID, as well as, of B1 and B2 retroposed elements as shown in this paper. This consensus is a potential target for enzymatic nicking which probably occurs in the complementary strand between 3′ AA and the following 3′ TTTT bases. The first four bases of the flanking repeats corresponding to the 3′ TTTT consensus sequence show some sequence variations that may be affected by complementary base pairing between the A-rich RNA tails and the DNA target sequences prior to nicking and reverse transcription. We discuss potential evidence for such base pairing based on correlated variations in nucleotide composition of different tail and target regions.
References
Bains W, Temple-Smith K (1989) Similarity and divergence among rodent repetitive DNA sequences. J Mol Evol 28:191–199
Daniels GR, Deininger PL (1985) Integration site preferences of the Alu family and similar repetitive DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 24:8939–8954
Eickbush TH (1992) Tranposing without ends: the non-LTR retrotransposable elements. New Biol 4:430–440
Feng Q, Moran J, Kazazian HH, Boeke JD (1996) Human L1 retrotransposon encodes a conserved endonuclease. Cell (in press)
Jurka J (1996) Sequence patterns indicate an enzymatic involvement in integration of mammalian retroposons (submitted)
Jurka J, Klonowski P, Dagman V, Pelton P (1996) CENSOR—a program for identification and elimination of repetitive elements from DNA sequences. Computers and Chemistry 20:119–122
Luan DD, Korman MH, Jakubczak JL, Eickbush TH (1993) Reverse transcription of R2Bm RNA is primed by a nick at the chromosomal target site: a mechanism for non-LTR retrotransposition. Cell 72:595–605
Martin F, Olivares M, Lopez MC, Alonso C (1996) Do non-long terminal repeat retrotransponsons have nuclease activity? Trends Biochem Sci 21:283–285
Moos M, Gallwitz D (1983) Structure of two human b-lactin-related processed genes one of which is located next to a simple repetitive sequence. EMBO J 2:757–761
Nadir E, Margalit H, Gallily T, Ben-Sasson SA (1996) Microsatellite spreading in the human genome: evolutionary mechanisms and structural implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:6470–6475
Van Arsdell SW, Denison RA, Bernstein LB, Weiner AM (1981) Direct repeats flank three small nuclear RNA pseudogenes in the human genome. Cell 26:11–17
Weiner AM, Deininger PL, Efstratiadis A (1986) Nonviral retroposons: genes, pseudogenes, and transposable elements generated by the reverse flow of genetic information. Annu Rev Biochem 55:631–661
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jurka, J., Klonowski, P. Integration of retroposable elements in mammals: Selection of target sites. J Mol Evol 43, 685–689 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02202117
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02202117