Log in

Disruption of a stapled anastomosis following therapeutic ultrasonics—Is there a risk?

Report of a case

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: We examined the theoretic possibility that therapeutic ultrasound can disrupt a stapled gastrointestinal anastomosis. METHOD: A case is reported in which leakage of a stapled ileocolic anastomosis occurred following therapeutic ultrasound. Calculations are performed on the power of the ultrasound beam and its adsorption and dispersion in the tissue between the probe and anastomosis to establish its intensity at the anastomosis. RESULTS: Ultrasound intensity at the anastomosis in this patient was calculated at 10 to 46 mW/cm 2.CONCLUSION: Although the calculated ultrasound intensities at the anastomosis do not appear to be very high, other factors such as “pressure doubling” and “stress concentration” at the stapled surface suggest that therapeutic ultrasound may cause staple disruption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Williams AR, Hughes DE, Nyborg WL. Haemolysis near a transversely oscillating wire. Science 1970;169:871–3.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kerr CL, Gregory KK, Watmough DJ, Wheatley DN. Ultrasound-induced damage of veins in pig ears, as revealed by scanning electron microscopy. Ultrasound Med Biol 1989;15:45–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nyborg WL. Mechanisms for nonthermal effects of sound. J Acoust Soc Am 1968;44:1302–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. ter Haar G, Dyson M, Smith SP. Ultrastructural changes in the mouse uterus brought about by ultrasonic irradiation at therapeutic intensities in standing wave fields. Ultrasound Med Biol 1979;5:167–79.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Keighley MR, Williams NS. Surgery of the anus rectum and colon. London: Saunders, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goldman DE, Heuter TF. Tabular data of the velocity and absorption of high frequency sound in mammalian tissues. J Acoust Soc Am 1956;28:35–7.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goldman DE, Heuter TF. Errata. Tabular data of the velocity and absorption of high frequency sound in mammalian tissues. J Acoust Soc Am 1957;29:655.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goldberg BB, Kotler MN, Ziskin MC, Waxham RD. Diagnostic uses of ultrasound. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Irvin TT. Collagen metabolism in infected colonic anastomosis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 143:220–4.

  10. Sheridan WD, Lownes RH, Young HL. Tissue oxygen measurement as a predictor of colonic anastomotic healing. Dis Colon Rectum 30:867–71.

  11. Wells PN. Physical principles of ultrasonic diagnosis. London: Academic Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Environmental Health Directorate. Canada-wide survey of nonionizing radiation emitting medical devices. Part II. Ultrasound devices, report 1980;80-EHD-53. Environmental Health Directorate, Health Protection Branch, Ottawa, Canada, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Environmental Health Directorate. Safety code 23 guidelines for the safe use of ultrasound. Part I. Medical and paramedical application, report 80-EHD-59. Environmental Health Directorate, Health Protection Branch, Ottawa, Canada, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Makin, A.J., Garnham, A.W. & Keighley, M.R.B. Disruption of a stapled anastomosis following therapeutic ultrasonics—Is there a risk?. Dis Colon Rectum 38, 993–995 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02049740

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02049740

Key words

Navigation