Log in

Modification of spectral sensitivities by screening pigments in the compound eyes of twilight-active fireflies (Coleoptera: Lampyridae)

  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    ERG S(λ) were determined in darkadapted intact preparations of 6 North American firefly species (Photinus collustrans, marginellus, pyralis, macdermotti, scintillans and Bicellonycha wickershamorum) which restrict their flashing activity to twilight hours. The curves possess narrow (1/2 bandwidth=50–60 nm) peaks in the yellow (560–580 nm) and a shoulder in the violet (370–420 nm), with amarked attenuation (1.4–2.2 log units) of sensitivity in the green (480–530 nm) region of the spectrum (Fig. 1). Two additional species (Photuris potomaca and frontalis) which initiate flashing at twilight and continue on late into the night (twi-night) possess broad sensitivity maxima around 560 nm (Fig. 3).

  2. 2.

    Selective adaptation experiments isolated near-UV and yellow inP. scintillans (Fig. 2). In the dorsal frontal region of the compound eyes inP. frontalis, high sensitivity existed only in the short wavelength region (near-UV and blue) with a maximum in the blue (λ max 435 nm) (Fig. 4).

  3. 3.

    The in situ MSP absorption spectrum of the screening pigments was determined in preparations of firefly retina. a) Two kinds of dark brown granules were found in the clear zone region. These granules absorb all across the spectrum with a gradual increase in optical density in the shorter wavelength region inP. pyralis (Fig. 5). b) Besides dark granules, pink-to-red colored screening pigments were present in the vicinity of the rhabdoms. The absorption spectra of these pigments determined in five species were narrow (1/2 bandwidth=50–80 nm) with species-specific differences in their peak absorption in the green at 525 nm, 510 nm, 512 nm and 517 nm inP. scintillans, macdermotti, collustrans and pyralis, respectively (Fig. 6). A similar pigment was found inP. marginellus with aλ max at 512 nm (Fig. 7). In all cases, transmission increased both at long and short wavelengths, but more sharply in the long wavelength region (Figs. 6 and 7). Hence each twilight-restricted species has its own unique colored screening pigment. A yellow pigment whose absorption spectrum differed from those found in genusPhotinus was found in twi-night activePhoturis potomaca (λ max 461 nm) and night-activeP. versicolor (λ max 456 nm). The transmission of thePhoturis pigment increased sharply only in the long wavelength region (Fig. 8).

  4. 4.

    In the twilight-restricted species, pink-to-red screening pigments modify dramatically the long green wavelength part of S(λ) functions. The calculated effect of the absorption of these screening pigments (O.D.=1.6 to 2.2; ¯X=1.8, n=4) on a theoretical S(λ) curve represented by a green (P550) rhodopsin, match the shape of the experimentally obtained dark-adapted ERG S(λ) in all cases (Figs. 9, 10). These screening pigments (Figs. 6, 7, 8) then would cause attenuation of sensitivity selectively in the green in twilight-restricted fireflies (Fig. 1) with a concomitant shifting of the peak of the sensitivity in the yellow as well as a narrowing of the visual spectral sensitivity. The pink-to-red colored screening pigments presumably would enhance color and/or brightness contrast in the mesopic range of ambient illumination.

  5. 5.

    The presence of the colored screens attenuates absolute sensitivity from 5–25% among different twilight-active species as compared to a night-activePhoturis lucicrescens (Fig. 11).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

MSP :

microphotospectrometer

References

  • Aepli G, Labhart T, Meyer EP (1985) Structural specializations of the cornea and retina at the dorsal rim of the compound eye in hymenopteran insects. Cell Tissue Res 239:19–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowmaker JK (1979) Visual pigments and oil droplets in the pigeon retina, as measured by microspectrophotometry and their relationship to spectral sensitivity. In: Granda AM, Maxwell JH (eds) Neural mechanisms of behavior in the pigeon. Plenum, New York, pp 287–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Casella AJ, Strother GK, Connolly JW (1975) Simplified recording microspectrophotometer. Appl Opt 14:771–777

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin TW (1985) The visual pigment of a stomatopod crustacean,Squilla empusa. J Comp Physiol A 156:679–687

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebrey TG, Honig B (1977) New wavelength dependent visual pigment nomograms. Vision Res 17:147–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Eguchi E, Nemoto A, Meyer-Rochow VB, Ohba N (1984) A comparative study of spectral sensitivity curves in three diurnal and eight nocturnal species of Japanese fireflies. J Insect Physiol 30:607–612

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith TH (1978) The effects of screening pigments on the spectral sensitivity of some Crustacea with scotopic (superposition) eyes. Vision Res 18:475–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith TH, Collins JS, Licht S (1984) The cone oil droplets of avian retinas. Vision Res 24:1661–1671

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein EB, Williams TP (1966) Calculated effects of ‘screening pigments’. Vision Res 6:39–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Granda AM, Haden KW (1970) Retinal oil globule counts and distributions in two species of turtles:Pseudemys scripta elegans (Wied) andChelonia mydas mydas (L.). Vision Res 10:79–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Höglund G (1966) Pigment migration, light screening and receptor sensitivity in the compound eye of nocturnal Lepidoptera. Acta Physiol Scand 69 [Suppl 282]: 1–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Höglund G, Langer H, Struwe G, Thorell B (1970) Spectral absorption by screening pigment granules in the compound eyes of a moth and a wasp. Z Vergl Physiol 67:238–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Höglund G, Hamdorf K, Rosner G (1973) Trichromatic visual system in an insect and its sensitivity control by blue light. J Comp Physiol 86:265–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Labhart T (1980) Specialized photoreceptors at the dorsal rim of the honeybee's compound eye: Polarizational and angular sensitivity. J Comp Physiol 141:19–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Labhart T, Hodel B, Valenzuela I (1984) The physiology of the cricket's compound eye with particular reference to the anatomically specialized dorsal rim area. J Comp Physiol A 155:289–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Lall AB (1981a) Electroretinogram and the spectral sensitivity of the compound eyes in the fireflyPhoturis versicolor (Coleoptera-Lampyridae): A correspondence between green sensitivity and species bioluminescence emission. J Insect Physiol 27:461–468

    Google Scholar 

  • Lall AB (1981b) Vision tuned to species bioluminescence emission in fireflyPhotinus pyralis. J Exp Zool 216:317–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Lall AB, Chapman RM, Trouth CO, Holloway JA (1980a) Spectral mechanisms of the compound eye in the fireflyPhotinus pyralis (Coleoptera; Lampyridae). J Comp Physiol 135:21–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Lall AB, Seliger HH, Biggley WH, Lloyd JE (1980b) Ecology of colors of firefly bioluminescence. Science 210:560–562

    Google Scholar 

  • Lall AB, Lord ET, Trouth CO (1982) Vision in the fireflyPhoturis lucicrescens (Coleoptera: Lampyridae): Spectral sensitivity and selective adaptation in the compound eye. J Comp Physiol 147:195–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Lall AB, Strother GK, Ribi W, Seliger HH, Chapados P, Lloyd JE (1984) In situ MSP measurements of screening pigments in rhabdomeric slices and their effect on the visual spectral sensitivity in twilight active fireflies. Abstract ARVO 1984. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci [Suppl] 25:219

    Google Scholar 

  • Lall AB, Lord ET, Trouth CO (1985) Electrophysiology of the visual system in the cricketGryllus firmus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae): Spectral sensitivity of the compound eyes. J Insect Physiol 31:353–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Lall AB, Seliger HH, Strother GK, Cronin T, Lloyd JE (1985) Modification of visual spectral sensitivity by colored screening pigments in the compound eyes of some twilight active fireflies. Abstract ARVO 1985. Invest Opththalmol Visual Sci [Suppl] 26:114

    Google Scholar 

  • Land MF (1981) Optics and vision in invertebrates. In: Autrum H (ed) Vision in invertebrates (Handbook of sensory physiology, vol VIIB). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 471–593

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer H (1975) Properties and functions of screening pigments in insect eyes. In: Snyder AW, Menzel R (eds) Photoreceptor optics. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 429–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipetz LE (1984) Pigment types, densities and concentrations in cone oil droplets ofEmydoidea blandingii. Vision Res 24:605–612

    Google Scholar 

  • Lythgoe JN (1968) Visual pigments and visual range underwater. Vision Res 8:997–1012

    Google Scholar 

  • Lythgoe JN (1984) Visual pigments and environmental light. Vision Res 24:1539–1550

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinecke CC (1981) The fine structure of the compound eye of the African armyworm moth,Spodoptera exempta Walk. (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae). Cell Tissue Res 216:333–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribi WA (1978) Colour receptors in the eye of the digger wasp,Sphex cognatus Smith: evaluation by selective adaptation. Cell Tissue Res 195:471–483

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribi WA (1979) Coloured screening pigments cause red eye glow in pierid butterflies. J Comp Physiol 132:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Seliger HH, Lall AB, Lloyd JE, Biggley WH (1982a) On the colors of firefly bioluminescence. I. An optimization model. Photochem Photobiol 36:673–680

    Google Scholar 

  • Seliger HH, Lall AB, Lloyd JE, Biggley WH (1982b) On the colors of firefly bioluminescence. II. Experimental evidence for the optimization model. Photochem Photobiol 36:681–688

    Google Scholar 

  • Sillman AJ, Bolnick DA, Haynes LW, Walter AE, Loew ER (1981) Microspectrophotometry of the photoreceptors of palaeognathous birds, the Emu and the Tinamou. J Comp Physiol 144:271–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowe S (1980) Spectral sensitivity and retinal pigment movement in the crabLeptograpsus variegatus (Fabricius). J Exp Biol 87:73–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Strother GK, Casella AJ (1972) Microspectrophotometry of arthropod visual screening pigments. J Gen Physiol 59:616–636

    Google Scholar 

  • Strother GK, Superdock DA (1972) In situ absorption spectra ofDrosophila melanogaster visual screening pigments. Vision Res 12:1545–1547

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderer H, Smola U (1982) Fine structure of ommatidia at the dorsal eye margin ofCalliphora erythrocephala Meigen (Diptera: Calliphoridae): An eye region specialized for the detection of polarized light. Int J Insect Morphol Embryol 11:25–38

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Contribution No. 1357 of the McCollum-Pratt Institue and Department of Biology, The Johns Hopkins University

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lall, A.B., Strother, G.K., Cronin, T.W. et al. Modification of spectral sensitivities by screening pigments in the compound eyes of twilight-active fireflies (Coleoptera: Lampyridae). J. Comp. Physiol. 162, 23–33 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01342700

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01342700

Keywords

Navigation