Log in

Current levelling behaviour under pulse current electroplating conditions: The role of reaction pseudocapacitance

  • Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Applied Electrochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite growing interest in pulse current electroplating, published theories have not evolved beyond treatments of simple, single-step reaction kinetics. This omission of multiple-step kinetics and associated reaction pseudocapacitance is responsible for the inability to interpret mechanistically several key pulse current electrodeposition process characteristics.

A complex kinetics charge transfer model is developed to describe the enhanced geometric control of deposit thickness achievable with judiciously chosen pulse current control conditions. This semiquantitative analysis demonstrates that deposit thickness ‘levelling’ is primarily the result of the strong potential dependence of the reaction pseudocapacitance, together with proper choices of pulse current control variables. For any system of interest, a well defined on-time current,I A, and on-time and off-time periods,t A andt B, are optimum for minimizing relative deposit thickness variation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. W. Jernstedt,Ann. Proc. Amer. Electroplaters' Soc. 36 (1949) 63.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. J. Avila and M. J. Brown,Plating 57 (1970) 1105.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. R. Despic and K. I. Popov,J. Appl. Electrochem. 1 (1971) 275.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. C. Wan, H. Y. Cheh, and H. B. Linford,Plating 61 (1974) 559.

    Google Scholar 

  5. W. Sullivan,ibid.Plating 62 (1975) 139.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. D. E. McIntyre and W. F. Peck, Jr.,J. Electrochem. Soc. 123 (1976) 1800.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ch. J. Raub and A. Knodler,Gold Bull. 10 (1977) 38.

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. Missel and T. Montelbano,Electron. Packag., April, (1978) 166.

    Google Scholar 

  9. N. Ibl,Surf. Technol. 10 (1980) 81.

    Google Scholar 

  10. L. Missel, P. Duke, and T. Montelbano,Semiconductor Int., February 67 (1980).

  11. N. Ibl,J. Electrochem. Soc. 114 (1967) 1268.

    Google Scholar 

  12. N. Ibl, J. C. Puippe and H. AngererSurf. Technol. 6 (1978) 287.

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. Y. Cheh,J. Electrochem. Soc. 118 (1971) 551.

    Google Scholar 

  14. K. Viswanathan, M. A. Farrell Epstein, and H. Y. Cheh,ibid.J. Electrochem. Soc. 125 (1978) 1772.

    Google Scholar 

  15. K. Viswanathan and H. Y. Cheh,ibid.J. Electrochem. Soc. 125 (1978) 1616.

    Google Scholar 

  16. K. Viswanathan, H. Y. Cheh and G. L. StandartJ. Appl. Electrochem. 10 (1980) 37.

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. Y. Cheh, International Society of Electrochemistry, 35th Meeting, Abstract B6-6.

  18. H. E. Hager, in preparation forJ. Appl. Electrochem.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hager, H.E. Current levelling behaviour under pulse current electroplating conditions: The role of reaction pseudocapacitance. J Appl Electrochem 16, 189–195 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01093350

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01093350

Keywords

Navigation