Log in

Geographic variation in the territorial success ofDrosophila melanogaster males

  • Published:
Behavior Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Drosophila melanogaster males defend food against other males to increase their access to females on food. The territorial behavior of stocks collected from Townsville, Corindi, and Melbourne on the east coast of Australia were compared. Males from these stocks showed the same incidence of territorial encounters. However, Melbourne males were more successful at obtaining territories in competition with Townsville or Corindi males. This difference could be accounted for largely by variation in body weight, although territorial success was also determined by other factors because Townsville and Corindi males that held territories were not heavier than Melbourne males. In reciprocal crosses between the populations there was directional dominance for increased territorial success. F1 males were of intermediate weight and F1 males that held territories tended to be lighter than territorial Melbourne males. Melbourne males were more successful than Townsville males because they tended to win escalated encounters, resulting in displacement of territory residents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • David, J. R., and Bocquet, C. (1975). Similarities and differences in latitudinal adaptation of twoDrosophila sibling species.Nature 257:588–590.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, A. A. (1987a). A laboratory study of male territoriality in the sibling speciesDrosophila melanogaster andD. simulans.Anim. Behav. 35:807–818.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, A. A. (1987b). Territorial encounters betweenDrosophila males of different sizes.Anim. Behav. 35:1899–1901.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, A. A. (1988). Heritable variation for territorial success in twoDrosophila melanogaster populations.Anim. Behav. 36:1180–1189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, M. E. (1960). Influence of light on mating ofDrosophila melanogaster.Ecology 41:182–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misra, R. K., and Reeve, E. C. R. (1964). Clines in body dimensions in populations ofDrosophila subobscura.Genet. Res. 5:240–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichert, S. E. (1981). The consequences of being territorial: spiders, a case study.Am. Nat. 117:871–892.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R., and Rohlf, F. J. (1981).Biometry, Freeman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalker, H. D., and Carson, H. L. (1947). Morphological variation in natural populations ofDrosophila robusta Sturtevant.Evolution 2:295–305.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoffmann, A.A. Geographic variation in the territorial success ofDrosophila melanogaster males. Behav Genet 19, 241–255 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065908

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065908

Key Words

Navigation