References
American Psychological Association (1991, October).Ethics code (draft revision). Washington, DC: Author.
Bersoff, D. N. (1990, March).APA and the Supreme Court: A ten-year retrospective. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society, Williamsburg, VA.
Browne, A., & Finkelhor, D. (1986). Impact of child sexual abuse: A review of the research.Psychological Bulletin, 99, 66–77.
Bussey, K., Lee, K., & Grimbeck, E. J. (in press). Lies and secrets: Implications for children's reporting of sexual abuse. In G. S. Goodman & B. L. Bottoms (Eds.)Understanding and improving children's testimony. New York: Guilford.
Cashmore, J., & Bussey, K. (1990). Children's conception of the witness role. In J. Spencer, G. Nicholson, R. Flin, & R. Bull (Eds.),Children's evidence in legal proceedings (pp. 177–188. London: Hawksmere.
Committee on Ethical Guidelines for Forensic Psychologists. (1991). Specialty guidelines for forensic psychologists.Law and Human Behavior, 15, 655–665.
Commonwealth v. Ludwig, Pa., 594 A.2d 281 (1991).
Craig v. Maryland, 322 Md. 418, 588 A.2d 328 (1991).
Dent, H. (1977). Stress as a factor influencing person recognition in identification parades.Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 30, 339–340.
Ellsworth, P. (1990). To tell what we know or to wait for Godot.Law and Human Behavior, 15, 77–90.
Finkelhor, D., & Browne, A. (1985). The traumatic impact of child sexual abuse.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 55, 530–541.
Goodman, G. S. (1989).The emotional effects on child sexual assault victims of testifying in criminal court. Final report to the National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC.
Goodman, G. S., Jones, D. P. H., Pyle, E., Prado, L., Port, L., England, P., & Rudy, L. (1988). The child in court: A preliminary report on the emotional effects of criminal court testimony on child sexual assault victims. In G. Davies & J. Drinkwater (Eds.),Proceedings from the Oxford conference on children in courts: Do the courts abuse children? (pp. 46–54). Oxford, England: British Psychological Association.
Goodman, G. S., Levine, M., Melton, G. B., & Ogden, D. W. (1991). Child witnesses and the confrontation clause: The American Psychological Association brief inMaryland v. Craig.Law and Human Behavior, 15, 13–29.
Goodman, G. S., Pyle-Taub, E., Jones, D. P. H., England, P., Port, L., Rudy, L., & Prado, L. (in press). The effects of criminal court testimony on child sexual assault victims.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.
Goodman, G. S., Rudy, L., Bottoms, B. L., & Aman, C. (1990). Children's memory and children's concerns: Issues of ecological validity in the study of children's eyewitness testimony. In R. Fivush & J. Hudson (Eds.),Knowing and remembering in young children (pp. 249–284). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Goodman, G. S., Taub, E., Jones, D. P. H., England, P., & Prado, L. (1989, August). Emotional effects of court involvement on children. In G. S. Goodman (Chair),Child abuse victims in court. Symposium presented at the American Psychological Association meeting, New Orleans.
Hill, P. E., & Hill, S. M. (1987). Videota** children's testimony: An empirical view.Michigan Law Review, 85, 809–833.
Kentucky v. Stincer, 482 U.S. 730 (1987).
MacDonald, J. M. (1971).Rape: Offenders and their victims. Springfield, IL: Thomas.
Maryland v. Craig, 110 S.Ct. 3157 (1990).
Meehl, P. E. (1989). Law and the fireside inductions (with postscript): Some reflections of a clinical psychologist.Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 7, 521–550.
Melton, G. B. (1990). Knowing what wedo know: APA and adolescent abortion.American Psychologist, 45, 1171–1173.
Melton, G. B., & Limber, S. (1989). Psychologists involvement in cases of child maltreatment: Limits of role and expertise.American Psychologist, 44, 1225–1233.
Melton, G. B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N. G., & Slobogin, C. (1987).Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers. New York: Guilford.
Oates, R., & Tong, L. (1987). Sexual abuse of children: An area with room for professional reforms.Medical Journal of Australia, 147, 544–548.
Parker, J. (1982). The rights of child witnesses: Is the court a protector or perpetrator?New England Law Review, 17, 643–717.
Peters, D. (1988, March). The effects of event-stress and stress during lineup identification on eyewitness accuracy in children. In D. Peters (Chair),Children's eyewitness testimony. Symposium presented at the American Psychology-Law Society meeting, Miami.
Peters, D. (1990, March).Confrontational stress and children's testimony: Some experimental findings. Paper presented at the American Psychology-Law Society meeting, Williamsburg, VA.
Pynoos, R., & Eth, S. (1984). The child witness to homicide.Journal of Social Issues, 40(2), 87–108.
Sas, L. (1990).Reducing system-induced trauma for child sexual abuse victims through court preparation, assessment, and follow-up. Unpublished manuscript, London Family Court Clinic.
Sas, L. (1991, August). Preparing sexually abused children for the stress of court: A controlled study. In G. S. Goodman (Chair),Assessment, diagnosis, and support of child sexual abuse victims. Invited symposium presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco.
Small, M. A., & Melton, G. B. (1991).Evaluation of child witnesses for confrontation by criminal defendants. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Smith, B. (1991).Prosecution of child maltreatment cases. Progress report to the National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect, Washington, DC.
Spencer, J. R., & Flin, R. (1990).The evidence of children. London: Blackstone.
Tidwell, R., & Lipovsky, J. (1991).Child victims and witnesses: A three-state profile. Final report to the State Justice Institute (grant No. 88-11J-D-064).
Underwager, R., & Wakefield, H. (1992). Poor psychology produces poor law. Preceding paper, this issue,Law and Human Behavior, 16, 233–243.
Weithorn, L. A., & Grisso, T. (1987). Psychological evaluations in divorce custody: Problems, principles, and procedures. In L. A. Weithorn (Ed.),Psychology and child custody determinations: Knowledge, roles, and expertise (pp. 157–181). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Goodman, G.S., Levine, M. & Melton, G.B. The best evidence produces the best law. Law Hum Behav 16, 244–251 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044801
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044801