Log in

On the impact on forecast accuracy of the step-mountain (eta) vs. sigma coordinate

  • Published:
Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Impact on forecast accuracy of the choice of the step-mountain (“eta”) vs. the traditional sigma coordinate is examined by using a model which can be run as either an eta or sigma system model via a simple switch in its code. This is done by (a) synoptic examination of the differences in a set of three forecasts, and (b) comparison of precipitation skill scores in a set of nine consecutive forecasts; each of these sets of forecasts was performed using one and then the other of the two systems. Both efforts indicate that greater accuracy is achnieved in the step-mountain coordinate forecasts. The three forecasts examined from the synoptic point of view are also compared against forecasts of another sigma system model. The two sigma models are found to have errors of an almost identical pattern (two cases) or to have errors which seemed to have the same basic cause.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achtemeier, G. L., 1991: Reducing hydrostatic truncation error in a mesobeta boundary layer model.Mon. Wea. Rev.,119, 223–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthes, R. A., 1983: Regional models of the atmosphere in middle latitudes.Mon. Wea. Rev.,111, 1306–1335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arakawa, A., 1988: Finite-difference methods in climate modeling. In: Schlesinger, M. E. (ed.)Physically-Based Modelling and Simulation of Climate and Climatic Change, Part I. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 79–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. J., Mendez-Nunez, L. R., Tanrikulu, S., 1987: Accurate pressure gradient calculations in hydrostatic atmospheric models.Bound-Layer Meteor. 41, 149–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandin, L. S., Murphy, A. H., 1992: Equitable skill scores for categorical forecasts.Mon. Wea. Rev.,120, 361–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haney, R. L., 1991: On the pressure gradient force over steep topography in sigma coordinate ocean models.J Phys. Oceanogr.,21, 610–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoke, J. E., Phillips, N. A., DiMego, G. J., Tuccillo, J. J., Sela, J. G., 1989: The regional analysis and forecast system of the National Meteorological Center.Wea. Forecasting,4, 323–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janjić, Z. I., 1977: Pressure gradient force and advection scheme used for forecasting with steep and small scale topography.Contrib. Atmos. Phys.,50, 186–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janjić, Z. I., 1990: The step-mountain coordinate: physical package.Mon. Wea. Rev.,118, 1429–1443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesinger, F., 1982: On the convergence and error problems of the calculation of the pressure gradient force in sigma coordinate models.Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid. Dyn.,19, 105–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesinger, F., 1984: A blocking technique for representation of mountains in atmospheric models.Riv. Meteor. Aeronautica,44, 195–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesinger, F., 1988: False precipitation enhancement due to the vertical moisture advection scheme. Res. Activities Atoms. Oceanic Modelling, Rept. No. 11, WMO, Geneva, 3.22–3.23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesinger, F., 1990: “Horizontal” pressure reduction to sea level. Preprints, 21. Internationale Tagung für Alpine Meteorologie, 17.–21. September 1990, Engelberg, Schweiz. Schweizerische meteorologische Anstalt, Krähbühlstrasse 58, CH-8044 Zürich, Switzerland, 31–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesinger, F., Black T. L., Janjić, Z. I., 1988a: Sigma system contribution to systematic errors in models of the atmosphere. Workshop on Systematic Erros in Models of the Atmosphere, Toronto, 19–23 September 1988, CAS/JSC Working Group of Numerical Experimentation Rept. No.12, WMO, Geneva, 253–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesinger, F., Janjić, Z. I., 1987: Numerical techniques for the representation of mountains in atmospheric models. Observation, Theory and Modelling of Orographic Effects, Seminar/workshop 1986, Vol. 2, ECMWF, Shinfield Park, Reading, U. K., 29–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesinger, F., Janjić, Z. I., 1990: Numerical methods for the primitive equations (space). 10 Years of Medium-Range Weather Forecasting, Seminar 1989, Vol. 1, ECMWF, Shinfield Park, Reading, U.K., 205–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesinger, F., Janjić, Z. I., Ničković, S. Gavrilov, D., Deaven, D. G., 1988b: The step-mountain coordinate: model description and performance for cases of Alpine lee cyclogenesis and for a case of Applachian redevelopment.Mon. Wea. Rev.,116, 1493–1518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesinger, F., Lobocki, L., 1991: Sensitivity to the parameterization of surface fluxes in NMC's eta model. Preprints, Ninth Conf. Numerical Weather Prediction, Denver, CO, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 213–216. [Boston, MA 02108.]

  • Schaefer, J. T., 1990: The critical success index as an indicator of warning skill.Wea. Forecasting,5, 570–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, A. J., Burridge, D. M., 1981: An energy and angularmomentum conserving vertical finite-difference scheme and hybrid vertical coordinates.Mon. Wea. Rev.,109, 758–766.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, W. T., Burk, S. D., 1991: An investigation of an arctic front with a vertically nested mesoscale model.Mon. Wea. Rev.,119, 233–261.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

With 13 Figures

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mesinger, F., Black, T.L. On the impact on forecast accuracy of the step-mountain (eta) vs. sigma coordinate. Meteorl. Atmos. Phys. 50, 47–60 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01025504

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01025504

Keywords

Navigation