Abstract
Postmodern inquiry into the discursive construction of identity has the potential to make a distinctive, democratizing contribution to public policy analysis. More so than conventional approaches, a postmodern policy analysis offers the opportunity to interrogate assumptions about identity embedded in the analysis and making of public policy, thereby enabling us to rethink and resist questionable distinctions that privilege some identities at the expense of others. Public policy analysis can benefit from postmodernism's emphasis on how ‘discourse’ constructs ‘identity.’ A review of postmodernism and postmodern approaches to interrogating identity is followed by an exercise in postmodern policy analysis. Social welfare policy in contemporary ‘postindustrial’ America is shown to participate in the construction and maintenance of identity in ways that affect not just the allocation of public benefits, but also economic opportunities outside of the state. Mired in old, invidious distinctions (e.g., independent/dependent, contract/charity, family/promiscuity), welfare policy discourse today helps to recreate the problems of yesterday, particularly as a critical factor in reproducing women's poverty.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramovitz, Mimi (1989).Regulating the Lives of Women: Social Welfare Policy from Colonial Times to the Present. Boston: South End Press.
Amott, Teresa L. (1990). ‘Black women and AFDC: Making entitlement out of necessity,’ in Linda Gordon, ed.,Women, The State, and Welfare. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 280–300.
An, Chong-Bum, Robert Haveman, and Barbara Wolfe (1991). ‘Reducing teen out-of-wedlock births: The role of parental education and family stability,’ Discussion Paper 944–91, Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Anderson, Walter Truett (1993).Reality Isn't What It Used to Be: Theatrical Politics, Ready-to-Wear Religion, Global Myths, Primitive Chic, and Other Wonders of the Postmodern World. San Francisco: HarperCollins.
Baca Zinn, Maxine (1989). ‘Family, race, and poverty in the eighties,’Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 14: 856–874.
Bane, Mary Jo (1986). ‘Household composition and poverty,’ in Sheldon H. Danziger and Daniel H. Weinberg, eds.,Fighting Poverty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 209–231.
Best, Joel (1989).Images of Issues: Typifying Contemporary Social Problems. New York: de Gruyter.
Block, Fred (1990).Postindustrial Possibilities: A Critique of Economic Discourse. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Center on Social Welfare Policy and Law (1991).1991 State Budgets and Welfare: A Bad Year for the Poor. Washington, DC.
Cloward, Richard A. and Frances Fox Piven (1991). ‘Race and the democrats,’The Nation (December 9): 737–740.
Connolly, William E. (1991).Identity/Difference: Democratic Negotiations of Political Paradox. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Danziger, Sheldon and Jonathan Stern (1990). ‘The causes of consequences of child poverty in the United States,’ Research Report No. 90-194, Population Studies Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Dobuzinskis, Laurent (1992). ‘Modernist and postmodernist metaphors of the policy process: Control and stability vs. chaos and reflexive understanding,’Policy Sciences 25: 355–380.
Edelman, Murray (1988).Constructing the Political Spectacle Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Edsall, Thomas Byrne with Mary D. Edsall (1991).Chain Reaction: The Impact of Race, Rights and Taxes on American Politics. New York: Norton.
Eggebeen, David J. and Daniel T. Lichter (1991). ‘Race, family structure, and changing poverty among American children.’American Sociological Review 56: 801–817.
Foucault, Michel (1991). ‘Questions of methods,’ in Graham Burchell, Colin Gordon and Peter Miller, eds.,The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 73–86.
Fraser, Nancy (1989).Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse, and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Fraser, Nancy (1993). Clintonism, Welfare, and the Antisocial Wage: The Emergence of a Neoliberal Political Imaginary.Rethinking MARXISM 6(1): 9–23.
Gordon, Linda (1989). ‘What does welfare regulate?’Social Research 55: 609–630.
Hawkesworth, Mary (1988).Theoretical Issues in Policy Analysis. Albany: SUNY Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schram, S.F. Postmodern policy analysis: Discourse and identity in welfare policy. Policy Sci 26, 249–268 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999719
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999719