Log in

Ernst Mayr's influence on the history and philosophy of biology: A personal memoir

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mayr has made both conceptual and professional contributions to the establishment of the history and philosophy of biology. His conceptual contributions include, among many others, the notion of population thinking. He has also played an important role in the establishment of history and philosophy of biology as viable professional disciplines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agassi, J.: 1972,Faraday as a Natural Philosopher, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckner, M.: 1959,The Biological Way of Thought, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkson, W.: 1974,Fields of Force, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, P. J.: 1988,The Non-Darwinian Revolution, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bynum, W. F.: 1985, On the Written Authority of Ernst Mayr,Nature 317, 585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmond, A.: 1989,The Politics of Evolution: Morphology, Medicine, and Reform in Radical London, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, M.: 1966, On Psychologism in the Logic of Taxonomic Principles,Systematic Zoology 15, 207–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, M.: 1974, A Radical Solution to the Species Problem,Systematic Zoology 23, 536–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goudge, T. A.: 1961,The Ascent of Life, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J.: 1984, Balzan Prize to Ernst Mayr,Science 223, 255–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J.: 1993,Eight Little Piggies, W. W. Norton & Company, New York and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. C.: 1981,Science, Ideology, and World View, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grene, M.: 1958, Two Evolutionary theories,British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 9, 110–127 & 185–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herschel, J.: 1830,Preliminary Discourse on the Study of Natural Philosophy, Longman Rees, Orme, Brown and Green, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, F. L.: 1992,Hans Krebs: The Formation of a Scientific Life, 1900–1933, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. L.: 1964, Consistency and Monophyly,Systematic Zoology 13, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. L.: 1968, The Operational Imperative: Sense and Nonsense in Operationism,Systematic Zoology 17, 4378–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. L.: 1974, Are Species Really Individuals?Systematic Zoology 25, 174–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. L.: 1979, In Defense of Presentism,History and Theory 18, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, L. E.: 1993, Review of Holmes (1992),Journal of the History of Biology 26, 369–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S.: 1970,The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd ed.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1976,Evolution and the Diversity of Life, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1982,The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1988,Toward a New Philosophy of Biology: Observations of an Evolutionist, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1991,One Long Argument: Charles Darwin and the Genesis of Modern Evolutionary Thought, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1990, When is Historiography Whiggish?Journal of the History of Ideas 51, 301–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrell, V.: 1994, Rise and Fall of the Y Chromosome,Science 263, 171–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R. R.: 1993, Arguments in a Sartorial Mode, or The Asymmetries of History and Philosophy of Science,PSA 1992, Vol. II., D. Hull, M. Forbes, and K. Okruhlik (eds.), pp. 482–489, East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudwick, M. J. S.: 1985,The Great Devonian Controversy: The Sha** of Scientific Knowledge among Gentlemanly Specialists, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M.: 1993, Booknotes,Biology & Philosophy 8, 477–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whewell, W.: 1840,The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, founded upon their History, J. W. Parker, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. Pearce, 1975, Should Philosophers Be Allowed to Write History?The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 26, 241–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodger, J. H.: 1929,Biological Principles, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodger, J. H.: 1937,The Axiomatic Method in Biology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodger, J. H.:Biology and Language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hull, D.L. Ernst Mayr's influence on the history and philosophy of biology: A personal memoir. Biol Philos 9, 375–386 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00857944

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00857944

Key words

Navigation