Summary
The continuing discussion of the species problem suffers from the lack of a coherent ontological theory as a basis for determining whether species have an ontological status. It has attempted to apply a full-fledged metaphysical theory to the species problem: the ontology of Mario Bunge. In doing so a few ontological fundamentals including system, individual, real and conceptual object, and law are briefly introduced. It is with the help of these fundamentals that an analysis of the species-as-individuals thesis is carried out, concluding that species are not individuals (things), but natural kinds, and that they have no ontological status. In contradistinction to the traditional view of natural kinds involving possible worlds metaphysics and semantics a notion of natural kind is given in terms of the state space approach and of nomological equivalence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ax, P.: 1984,Das Phylogenetische System, Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, New York. (Engl. version: 1987,The Phylogenetic System, J. Wiley & Sons, Chichester, New York.)
Ax, P.: 1988,Systematik in der Biologie, Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart.
Bernier, R.: 1984, ‘The Species as an Individual. Facing Essentialism’,Systematic Zoology 33, 460–469.
Buck, R. C. and D. L. Hull: 1966, ‘The Logical Structure of the Linnean Hierarchy’,Systematic Zoology 15, 97–111.
Bunge, M.: 1977, Treatise on Basic Philosophy, Vol. 3, Ontology I:The Furniture of the World, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Boston.
Bunge, M.: 1979a, Treatise on Basic Philosophy, Vol. 4, Ontology II:A World of Systems, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Boston.
Bunge, M.: 1979b, ‘Some Topical Problems in Biophilosophy’,Journal of Social and Biological Structures 2, 155–172.
Bunge, M.: 1981a, ‘Biopopulations, Not Biospecies, Are Individuals and Evolve’,Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4, 284–285.
Bunge, M.: 1981b, ‘Systems All the Way’,Nature and System 3, 37–47.
Bunge, M.: 1981c,Scientific Materialism, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Bunge, M.: 1983, Treatise on Basic Philosophy, Vol. 5, Epistomology & Methodology I:Exploring the World, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Boston.
Bunge, M., 1985, Treatise on Basic Philosophy, Vol. 7, Epistomology & Methodology III,Philosophy of Science and Technology, Part I & II: D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Boston.
Caplan, A. L.: 1981, ‘Back to Class: A Note on the Ontology of Species’,Philosophy of Science 48, 130–140.
Caplan, A. L. & W. J. Bock: 1988, ‘Haunt Me No Longer’,Biology and Philosophy 3, 443–454.
Chandler, C. R. and M. H. Gromko: 1989, ‘On the Relationship Between Species Concepts and Speciation Processes’,Systematic Zoology 38, 116–125.
Cracraft, J.: 1987, ‘Species Concepts and the Ontology of Evolution’,Biology and Philosophy 2, 329–346.
Eldrege, N.: 1985, ‘The Ontology of Species’, in E. S. Vrba (ed.),Species and Speciation, Transvaal Museum Monograph 4, Transvaal Museum, Pretoria, pp. 17–20.
Falk, R.: 1988, ‘Species as Individuals’,Biology and Philosophy 3, 455–462.
Futuyma, D. J.: 1990,Evolutionsbiologie, Birkhäuser, Basel, Boston, Berlin. (orig. 1986,Evolutionary Biology, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.)
Ghiselin, M. T.: 1974, ‘A Radical Solution to the Species Problem’,Systematic Zoology 23, 536–544.
Ghiselin, M. T.: 1981, ‘Categories, Life, and Thinking’,Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4, 269–283.
Ghiselin, M. T.: 1984, ‘“Definition”, “Character”, and Other Equivocal Terms’,Systematic Zoology 33, 104–110.
Ghiselin, M. T.: 1987, ‘Species Concepts, Individuality, and Objectivity’,Biology and Philosophy 2, 127–143.
Ghiselin, M. T.: 1988, ‘The Individuality Thesis, Essences, and Laws of Nature’,Biology and Philosophy 3, 467–474.
Gregg, J. R.: 1950, ‘Taxonomy, Language, and Reality’,American Naturalist 84, 419–435.
Günther, K.: 1950, ‚Ökologische und funktionelle Anmerkungen zur Frage des Nahrungserwerbes bei Tiefseefischen mit einem Exkurs über die ökologischen Zonen und Nischen‘, in Festschrift Nachtsheim,Moderne Biologie, Berlin, pp. 55–93.
Heise, H.: 1981, ‘Universals, Particulars, and Paradigms’,Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4, 289–290.
Holsinger, K. E.: 1984, ‘The Nature of Biological Species’,Philosophy of Science 51, 293–307.
Hull, D. L.: 1976, ‘Are Species Really Individuals?’,Systematic Zoology 25, 174–191.
Hull, D. L.: 1978, ‘A Matter of Individuality’,Philosophy of Science 45, 335–360.
Hull, D. L.: 1984, ‘Can Kripke Alone Save Essentialism? A Reply to Kitts’,Systematic Zoology 33, 110–112.
Hull, D. L.: 1987, ‘Genealogical Actors in Ecological Roles’,Biology and Philosophy 2, 168–184.
Kitcher, P.: 1984a, ‘Species’,Philosophy of Science 51, 308–333.
Kitcher, P.: 1984b, ‘Against the Monism of the Moment: A Reply to Elliott Sober’,Philosophy of Science 51, 616–630.
Kitcher, P.: 1987, ‘Ghostly Whispers: Mayr, Ghiselin, and the “Philosophers” on the Ontological Status of Species’,Biology and Philosophy 2, 184–192.
Kitts, D. B.: 1983, ‘Can Baptism Alone Save a Species?’,Systematic Zoology 32, 27–33.
Kitts, D. B.: 1984, ‘The Names of Species. A Reply to Hull’,Systematic Zoology 33, 112–115.
Kitts, D. B. & D. J. Kitts: 1979, ‘Biological Species as Natural Kinds’,Philosophy of Science 46, 613–622.
Kluge, A.: 1990, ‘Species as Historical Individuals’,Biology and Philosophy 5, 417–431.
Lang, H. S.: 1983, ‘Aristotle and Darwin. The Problem of Species’,International Philosophical Quaterly 23, 141–253.
Mayr, E.: 1967,Artbegriff und Evolution, Paul Parey Verlag, Hamburg, Berlin. (orig. 1963,Animal Species and Evolution).
Mayr, E.: 1982,The Growth of Biological Thought, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Mayr, E.: 1987, ‘The Ontological Status of Species. Scientific Progress and Philosophical Terminology’,Biology and Philosophy 2, 145–166.
Mishler, B. D. and R. N. Brandon: 1987, ‘Individuality, Pluralism, and the Phylogenetic Species Concept’,Biology and Philosophy 2, 397–414.
Mishler, B. D. and M. J. Donoghue: 1982, ‘Species Concepts: A Case for Pluralism’,Systematic Zoology 31, 491–503.
Osche, G.: 1972,Evolution, Herder, Freiburg, Basel, Wien.
Paterson, H. E. H.: 1985, ‘The Recognition Concept of Species’, in E. S. Vrba (ed.),Species and Speciation, Transvaal Museum Monograph 4, Transvaal Museum, Pretoria, pp. 21–29.
Reed, E. S.: 1979, ‘The Role of Symmetry in Ghiselin's “Radical Solution to the Species Problem”’,Systematic Zoology 28, 71–78.
Reig, O. A.: 1982, ‘The Reality of Biological Species: A Conceptualistic and a Systemic Approach’, in L. J. Cohenet al. (eds.),Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science VI, North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, New York, Oxford, pp. 479–499.
Ridley, M.: 1989, ‘The Cladistic Solution to the Species Problem’,Biology and Philosophy 4, 1–16.
Rosenberg, A.: 1987, ‘Why Does the Nature of Species Matter? Comments on Ghiselin and Mayr’,Biology and Philosophy 2, 192–197.
Ruse, M.: 1969, ‘Definitions of Species in Biology’,British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 20, 97–119.
Ruse, M.: 1981, ‘Species as Individuals: Logical, Biological, and Philosophical Problems’,Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4, 299–300.
Ruse, M.: 1987, ‘Biological Species: Natural Kinds, Individuals, or What?’,British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38, 225–242.
Salthe, S. N. 1985:Evolving Hierarchical Systems, Columbia University Press, New York.
Scoble, M. J.: 1985, ‘The Species in Systematics’, in E. S. Vrba (ed.),Species and Speciation, Transvaal Museum Monograph 4, Transvaal Museum, Pretoria, pp. 31–34.
Schwartz, S. S.: 1981, ‘Natural Kinds’,Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4, 301–302.
Sober, E.: 1984, ‘Sets, Species, and Evolution: Comments on Philip Kitcher's “Species”’,Philosophy of Science 51, 334–341.
Sudhaus, W.: 1984, ‘Artbegriff und Artbildung in zoologischer Sicht’,Zeitschrift für zoologische Systematik und Evolutionsforschung 22, 183–211.
Sudhaus, W.: 1986, ‘Wege der Artbildung’, in W. Laskowski (ed.),Evolution, Vortragsreihe der Gesellschaft naturforschender Freunde zu Berlin 1983/84. Duncker und Humblot, Berlin, pp. 91–120.
Templeton, A. R.: 1989, ‘The Meaning of Species and Speciation: A Genetic Perspective’, in Otte, D. and J. A. Endler (eds.),Speciation and Its Consequences, Sinauer Assoc. Publishers, Sunderland (Mass.), pp. 3–27.
Van Valen, L.: 1976a, ‘Individualistic Classes’,Philosophy of Science 43, 539–541.
Van Valen, L.: 1976b, ‘Ecological Species, Multispecies, and Oaks’,Taxon 25, 233–239.
Van Valen, L.: 1988, ‘Species, Sets, and the Derivative Nature of Philosophy’,Biology and Philosophy 3, 49–66.
Wiley, E. O.: 1978, ‘The Evolutionary Species Concept Reconsidered’,Systematic Zoology 27, 17–26.
Wiley, E. O.: 1980, ‘Is the Evolutionary Species Fiction? — A Consideration of Classes, Individuals, and Historical Entities’,Systematic Zoology 29, 76–80.
Williams, M. B.: 1985, ‘Species Are Individuals, Theoretical Foundations for the Claim’,Philosophy of Science 52, 578–590.
Williams, M. B.: 1987, ‘A Criterion Relating Singularity and Individuality’,Biology and Philosophy 2, 204–206.
Willmann, R.: 1985,Die Art in Raum und Zeit, Paul Parey Verlag, Berlin, Hamburg.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mahner, M. What is a species?. J Gen Philos Sci 24, 103–126 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00769517
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00769517