Log in

Economic evaluation of financial and non-financial costs and benefits in agroforestry development and the value of sustainability

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Financial appraisal of agroforestry is not different in kind from appraisals applied to pure forestry. Existing techniques for valuing non-market effects may also be applied. Effects on hydrological and carbon fluxes might be less favourable than those of pure forests. In the confusing field of biodiversity valuation too, only limited and specific claims can be made for agroforestry. Amenity valuation techniques developed for trees and woodlands encounter additional problems of interpretation in an agroforestry context. Agroforestry may offer a quantifiable value in short-term sustainability, and might meet recent economic definitions of long-term sustainable development, without encountering the full dangers to future generations embodied in conversion of natural to human capital.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrow P, Hinsley, AP and Price C (1986) The effect of afforestation on hydroelectricity generation: a quantitative assessment. Land Use Policy 3: 141–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson JF (1994) Values for forest landscapes using travel cost and tokens. Landscape Research 19: 23–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Blamey R and Common M (1994) Symbolic Responses in Contingent Valuation Studies. Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Blandon P (1985) Agroforestry and portfolio theory. Agroforestry Systems 3: 239–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broder JM and Odronic BH (1990) Economic potential of agroforestry for public recreational parks. Agroforestry Systems 10: 99–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calder IR and Newson MD (1979) Land use and upland water resources in Britain-a strategic look. Water Resources Bulletin 15: 1628–1639

    Google Scholar 

  • Cline WR (1992) The Economics of Global Warming. Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Collett MEW (1970) External costs arising from the effects of forests upon streamflow in Britain. Forestry 43: 181–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehui SK, Kang BT and Spencer DSC (1990) Economic analysis of soil erosion effects in alley crop**, no-till and bush fallow systems in South Western Nigeria. Agricultural Systems 34: 349–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer J (1990) Agroforestry and household food security. In: Prinsley RT (ed) Agroforestry for Sustainable Production, pp 215–239. Commonwealth Science Council, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrod GD and Willis KG (1992) Valuing goods' characteristics: an application of the hedonic pricing method to environmental attributes. Journal of Environmental Management 34: 59–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee AS and Stoner JH (1988) The effects of afforestation and acid deposition on the water quality and ecology of upland Wales. In: Usher MB and Thompson DBA (eds) Ecological Change in the Uplands, pp 273–287. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory GR (1955) An economic approach to multiple use. Forest Science 1: 6–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanley ND and Ruffell R (1993) The contingent valuation of forest characteristics. Journal of Agricultural Economics 44: 218–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanley ND and Spash C (1993) Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding RJ, Hall RL, Neal C, Roberts JM and Rosier PTW (1992) Hydrological impacts of Broadleaf Woodlands. National Rivers Authority, Bristol, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell DR (1990) Amenity Valuation of Trees and Woodlands. Arboricultural Association, Romsey, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D and Knetsch JL (1992) Valuing public goods: the purchase of moral satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 22: 57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay JA and Mirrlees JA (1975) The desirability of natural resource depletion. In: Pearce DW and Rose J (eds) The Economics of Natural Resource Depletion. Macmillan, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeks GJL and Roberts G (1987) The effect of forestry on upland streams with special reference to water quality and sediment transport. In: Good JE (ed) Environmental Effects of Plantation Forestry in Wales, pp 9–25. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Bangor, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilieholm RJ and Reeves LH (1991) Incorporating economic risk aversion in agroforestry planning. Agroforestry Systems 13: 63–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milner NJ and Varallo PV (1990) Effects of acidification on fish and fisheries in Wales. In: Edwards RW, Gee AS and Stoner JH (eds) Acid Waters in Wales, pp 121–143. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Minter R (1994) Sharing common values. Landscape Research 19: 2–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell RC and Carson RT (1989) Using Surveys to Value Goods: the Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce DW and Turner RK (1990) The Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment. Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Price C (1987) Upland land use: towards the elusive balance. In: Bell M and Bunce RGH (eds) Agriculture and Conservation in the Hills and Uplands, pp 156–159. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Grange-over-Sands, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Price C (1989) The Theory and Application of Forest Economics. Blackwell, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Price C (1990) Deforestation and economic criteria. Project Appraisal 5: 159–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Price C (1991) Landscape Valuation and Public Decision Making. Countryside Commission, Cheltenham, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Price C (1993a) Discounting diversity: a somewhat philosophical speculation. Scandinavian Forest Economics 34: 37–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Price C (1993b) Time, Discounting and Value. Blackwell, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Price C (1995) Pros and cons of alternative evaluation methods. In: Willis KG and Corkindale J (eds) Environmental Valuation: New Directions, pp 160–177. CAB International, Wallingford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Price C and Willis RW (1993) Time, discounting and the valuation of forestry's carbon fluxes. Commonwealth Forestry Review 72: 265–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall A (1991) The value of biodiversity. Ambio 20(2): 64–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves LH and Lilieholm RJ (1993) Reducing financial risk in agroforestry planning: a case study in Costa Rica. Agroforestry Systems 21: 169–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saville NM (1993) Bumblebee ecology in woodlands and arable farmland. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone SW, Kyle SC and Conrad JM 91993) Application of the Faustmann principle to a shortrotation tree species: an analytical tool for economists, with reference to Kenya and leucaena. Agroforestry Systems 21: 79–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teklehaimanot, Z, Jarvis PG and Ledger DC (1991) Rainfall interception and boundary layer conductance in relation to tree spacing. Journal of Hydrology 123: 261–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wannawong S, Belt GH and McKetta CW (1991) Benefit-cost analysis of selected agroforestry systems in northeastern Thailand. Agroforestry Systems 16: 83–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westoby JC (1962) The role of forestry in the attack on economic underdevelopment. Unasylva 16: 168–201

    Google Scholar 

  • White S (1990) The technical costs and benefits of agroforestry to the catchment as a whole. In: Prinsley RT (ed) Agroforestry for Sustainable Production, pp 323–350. Commonwealth Science Council, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead PG, Musgrove TJ and Cosby BJ (1990) Hydrochemical modelling of acidification in Wales. In: Edwards RW, Gee AS and Stoner JH (eds) Acid Waters in Wales, pp 255–277. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteman A (1994) The supply and demand for timber, recreation and community forest outputs from forests in Great Britain. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis RW, Thomas TH and Van Slycken J (1993) Poplar agroforestry: a re-evaluation of its economic potential on arable land in the United Kingdom. Forest Ecology and Management 57: 85–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on the Environment and Development (1987) Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Price, C. Economic evaluation of financial and non-financial costs and benefits in agroforestry development and the value of sustainability. Agroforest Syst 30, 75–86 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00708914

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00708914

Key words

Navigation