Log in

A nonlinear viscoelastic bushing element in multibody dynamics

  • Originals
  • Published:
Computational Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a formulation for incorporating nonlinear viscoelastic bushing elements into multibody systems. The formulation is based on the assumption that the relaxation function can be expressed as a sum of functions which are nonlinear in deformation and exponentially decreasing in time. These forces can represent elastomeric mounts or bushings in automotive suspension systems. The numerical implementation of the nonlinear viscoelastic bushing model into a general purpose rigid multibody dynamics code is described, and an extension of the formulation is also presented wherein component flexibility is included. Model validation was performed by comparing experimental data to simulation results obtained using the nonlinear viscoelastic model and a nonlinear elastic model. The experimental data were obtained at the Center's facilities by testing an automotive lower control arm/bushing system, subjected to a simulated road load event. The comparison demonstrates the better load prediction capability of the viscoelastic bushing model compared to the conventional model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ABAQUS: User's Manual, Habbitt, Karlsson and Sorensen, Inc., Pawtucket, Rhode Island

  • Shabana, A. 1989: Dynamics of Multibody Systems. Wiley

  • ADAMS: (Automatic Dynamic Analysis of Mechanical Systems) Reference Manual, Mechanical Dynamics, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan

  • Ambrosio, J.; Nikravesh, P. E. 1992: Elasto-plastic deformations in multibody dynamics. Nonlinear Dynamics. 3: 85–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagley, R.; Torvik, P. 1985: Fractional calculus in the transient analysis of viscoelastically damped structures. AIAA Journal. 23: 918–925

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, A. K. 1993: Block-diagonal equations for multibody elastodynamics with geometric stiffness and constraints. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics. 16: 1092–1100

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayo, E.; Avello, A. 1994: Singularity-free augmented Lagrangian algorithms for constrained multibody dynamics. Nonlinear Dynamics. 5: 209–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayo, E.; Ledesma, R. 1994: Augmented Lagrangian and projection methods for constrained multibody dynamics. Proceedings of the 23rd ASME Biennial Mechanisms Conference, Design Engineering Division. DE 72: 237–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutaghou, Z.; Erdman, A.; Stolarski, H. 1992: Dynamics of flexible beams and plates in large overall motions. ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics. 59: 991–999

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaul, L.; Chen, C. 1993: Modeling of viscoelastic elastomer mounts in multibody systems. In: Schiehlen, W. (ed). Advanced Multibody System Dynamics, pp. 257–276. Kluwer Academic Publishers

  • Golla, D.; Hughes, P. 1985: Dynamics of viscoelastic structures—a time domain finite element formulation. ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics. 52: 897–906

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzlohner, U. 1974: A finite element analysis for time-dependent problems. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering. 8: 55–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C.; Kienholz, D. 1982: Finite element prediction of dam** in structures with constrained viscoelastically damped structures. AIAA Journal. 20: 1284–1290

    Google Scholar 

  • Morman, K.; Nagtegaal, J. 1983: Finite element analysis of sinusoidal small-amplitude vibrations in deformed viscoelastic solids, part 1: theoretical development. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering. 19: 1079–1103

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, K.; Chiou, J. 1993: Discrete momentum-conserving explicit algorithm for rigid body dynamic analysis. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering. 36: 1071–1083

    Google Scholar 

  • Pipkin, A.; Rogers, T. 1968: A non-linear integral representation for viscoelastic behavior. Journal of Mechanics and Physics of Solids. 16: 59–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryu, J.; Kim, S. 1994: General approach to stress stiffening effects on flexible multibody dynamic systems. Mechanics of Structures and Machines. 22: 157–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamada, Y.; Takabatake, H.; Sato, T. 1974: Effect of time-dependent material properties on dynamic response. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering. 8: 403–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Unda, J.; Garcia de Jalon, J.; Losantos, F.; Esperantza, R. 1987: A comparative study on some different formulations of the dynamic equations of constrained mechanical systems. ASME Journal of Mechanisms, Transmissions and Automation in Design. 109: 466–474

    Google Scholar 

  • **e, M.; Amirouche, F. M. L. 1994: Treatment of creep and nonlinearities in flexible multibody dynamics. AIAA Journal. 32: 190–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallrapp, O.; Schwertassek, R. 1991: Representation of geometric stiffening in multibody system simulation. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering. 32: 1833–1850

    Google Scholar 

  • **e, K.; Roystre, L.; Ciskowski, R. 1989: A boundary element method formulation for fractional operator modeled viscoelastodynamic structures. In: Advances in Boundary Elements, Vol. 3, Stress Analysis, pp. 55–64. Computational Mechanics Publications

  • Yi, S.; Hilton, H. 1994: Dynamic finite element analysis of viscoelastic composite plates in the time domain. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering. 37: 4081–4096

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by S. N. Atluri, 9 October 1995

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ledesma, R., Ma, Z.D., Hulbert, G. et al. A nonlinear viscoelastic bushing element in multibody dynamics. Computational Mechanics 17, 287–296 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00368551

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00368551

Keywords

Navigation