SpringerLink
Log in

Molecular pathways to parallel evolution: I. Gene nexuses and their morphological correlates

  • Synthesis
  • Published:
Journal of Molecular Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aspects of the regulatory interactions among genes are probably as old as most genes are themselves. Correspondingly, similar predispositions to changes in such interactions must have existed for long evolutionary periods. Features of the structure and the evolution of the system of gene regulation furnish the background necessary for a molecular understanding of parallel evolution. Patently “unrelated” organs, such as the fat body of a fly and the liver of a mammal, can exhibit fractional homology, a fraction expected to become subject to quantitation. This also seems to hold for different organs in the same organism, such as wings and legs of a fly. In informational macromolecules, on the other hand, homology is indeed all or none. In the quite different case of organs, analogy is expected usually to represent attenuated homology. Many instances of putative convergence are likely to turn out to be predominantly parallel evolution, presumably including the case of the vertebrate and cephalopod eyes. Homology in morphological features reflects a similarity in networks of active genes. Similar nexuses of active genes can be established in cells of different embryological origins. Thus, parallel development can be considered a counter part to parallel evolution. Specific macromolecular interactions leading to the regulation of the c -fos gene are given as an example of a “controller node” defined as a regulatory unit. Quantitative changes in gene control are distinguished from relational changes, and frequent parallelism in quantitative changes is noted in Drosophila enzymes. Evolutionary reversions in quantitative gene expression are also expected. The evolution of relational patterns is attributed to several distinct mechanisms, notably the shuffling of protein domains. The growth of such patterns may in part be brought about by a particular process of compensation for “controller gene diseases,” a process that would spontaneously tend to lead to increased regulatory and organismal complexity. Despite the inferred increase in gene interaction complexity, whose course over evolutionary time is unknown, the number of homology groups for the functional and structural protein units designated as domains has probably remained rather constant, even as, in some of its branches, evolution moved toward “higher” organisms. In connection with this process, the question is raised of parallel evolution within the purview of activating and repressing master switches and in regard to the number of levels into which the hierarchies of genic master switches will eventually be resolved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abel T, Bhatt R, Maniatis T (1992) A Drosophila CREB/ATF transcriptional activator binds to both fat body- and liver-specific regulatory elements. Genes Dev 6:466–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Akimushkin II (1963) Cephalopods of the seas of the USSR. Israel program for scientific translations, Jerusalem

  • Beintema JJ (1988) Molecular evolution of the ribonuclease superfamily. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 51:165–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz LA, Riabowol KT, Gilman MZ (1989) Multiple sequence elements of a single functional class are required for cyclic AMP responsiveness of the mouse c-fos promoter. Mol Cell Biol 9:4272–4281

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunker CA, Kingston RE (1994) Transcriptional repression by Drosophila and mammalian polycomb group proteins in transfected mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol 14:1721–1732

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter GS (1965) Phylogenetic relations of major groups of animals. In: Moore JA (ed) Ideas in modem biology. The Natural History Press, New York, pp 429–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson HL (1992) Inversions in Hawaiian Drosophila. In Krimbas CB, Powell JR (eds) Drosophila inversion polymorphism. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 407–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Chuang CF, Ng SY (1994) Functional divergence of the MAP kinase pathway: ERK1 and ERK2 activate specific transcription factors. FEBS Lett 346:229–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton S, Treisman R (1992) Characterization of SAP-1, a protein recruioted by serum response factor to the cfos serum response element. Cell 68:597–612

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R (1994) The eye in a twinkling. Nature 368:690–691

    Google Scholar 

  • de Jong WF, Lubsen NH, Kraft HL (in press) Molecular evolution of the eye lens. Prog Retinal Eye Res 13:

  • Dickinson WJ (1988) On the architecture of regulatory systems: evolutionary insights and implications. Bioessays 8:204–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Doolittle RF, Bork P (1993) Evolutionarily mobile modules in proteins. Sci Am 269:50–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Dover GA (1992) Observing development through evolutionary eyes: a practical approach. Bioessays 14:281–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Duboule D, Dollé P (1989) The structural and functional organization of the murine HOX gene family resembles that of Drosophila homeotic genes. EMBO 18:1497–1505

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisch TB, Prywes R, Simon MC, Roeder RG (1989) Multiple sequence elements in the c-fos promoter mediate induction by cAMP. Genes Dev 3:198–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazzetta TH (1975) Complex adaptations in evolving populations. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu XY, Zhang JJ (1993) Transcription factor p91 interacts with the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and mediates activation of the c-fos gene promoter. Cell 74:1135–1145

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaunt SJ, Singh PB (1990) Homeogene expression patterns and chromosomal imprinting. Trends Genet 6:208–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Gius D, Cao X, Rauscher III FJ, Cohen DR, Curran T, Sukhatme VP (1990) Transcriptional activation and repression by Fos are independent functions: the C terminus represses immediate-early genbe expression via CArG elements. Mol Cell Biol 10:4243–4255

    Google Scholar 

  • Gojobori T, Ikeo K (1994) Molecular evolution of serine protease and its inhibitor with special reference to domain evolution. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Biol 344:411–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould SJ (1977) Ontogeny and phylogeny. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham A, Papalopulu N, Krumlauf R (1989) The murine and Drosophila homeobox gene complexes have common features of organization and expression. Cell 57:367–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Grueneberg D, Natesan S, Alexandre C, Gilman MZ (1992) Human and Drosophila homeodomain proteins that enhance the binding activity of serum response factor. Science 257:1089–1095

    Google Scholar 

  • Gualberto A, LePage D, Pons G, Mader SL, Park K, Atchison ML, Walsh K (1992) Functional antagonism between YY1 and the serum response factor. Mol Cell Biol 12:4209–4214

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutman A, Wasylyk C, Wasylik B (1991) Cell-specific regulation of oncogene-responsive sequences of the c-fos promoter. Mol Cell Biol 11:5381–5397

    Google Scholar 

  • Henikoff S (1990) Position-effect variegation after 60 years. Trends Genet 6:422–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Herskowitz I (1989) A regulatory hierarchy for cell specialization in yeast. Nature 342:749–757

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill CS, Marais R, John S, Wynne J, Dalton S, Treisman R (1993) Functional analysis of a growth factor-responsive transcription factor complex. Cell 73:395–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Hipskind RA, Rao VN, Mueller CGF, Reddy ESP, Nordheim A (1991) Ets-related protein Elk-1 is homologous to the c-fos regulatory factor p62TCF. Nature 354:531–534

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland P (1992) Homeobox genes in vertebrate evolution. Bioessays 14:267–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbs CL (1944) Concepts of homology and analogy. Am Nat 78: 290–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingham PW, Martinez-Arias A (1992) Boundaries and fields in early embryos. Cell 68:221–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Ip YT, Reach M, Engstrom Y, Kadalayil L, Cai H, González-Crespo S, Tatei K, Levine M (1993) Dif, a dorsal-related gene that mediates an immune response in Drosophila. Cell 75:753–763

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis EE, Clark KL, Sprague GF Jr (1989) The year transcription activator PRTF, a homolog of the mammalian serum response factor, is encoded by the MCM1 gene. Genes Dev 3:936–945

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman SA (1987) Developmental logic and its evolution. Bioessays 6:82–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettler MK, Ghent AW, Whitt GS (1986) A comparison of phylogenies based on structural and tissue-expressional differences of enzymes in a family of Teleost fishes (Salmoniformes: Umbridae). Mol Biol Evol 3:485–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsley DM (1994) What do BMPs do in mammals? Clues from the mouse short-ear mutation. Trends Genet 10:16–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolker E, Trifonov, EN (1995) Periodic recurrence of methionines: fossil of gene fusion? Proc Natl Acad Sci (in press)

  • Kurtén B (1963) Return of a lost structure in the evolution of the felid dentition. Societas Scientiarum Fennica, Commentationes Biol 26: 3–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtén B (1965) Evolution in geological time. In: Moore, JA (ed) Ideas in modem biology. The Natural History Press, New York, pp 327–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis EB (1978) A gene complex controlling segmentation in Drosophila. Nature 276:565–570

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu SH, Ma JT, Yueh AY, Lees-Miller SP, Anderson CW, Ng SY (1993) The carboxy-terminal transactivation domain of human serum response factor contains DNA-activated protein kinase phosphorylation sites. J Biol Chem 268:21147–21154

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu SH, Ng SY (1994) Serum response factor-associated ETS proteins: ternary complex factors and PEA3-binding factor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 201:1406–1413

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu SH, Peng BH, Ma JT, Liu YC, Ng SY (1994) Serum response element-associated transcription factors in mouse embryos: serum response factor, YY1, and PEA3 factor. Dev Genet (in press)

  • Ma IT, Ng SY (1994) Muscle homeodomain protein MHox inhibits ternary complex formation at the c-fos serum response element. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 200:1742–1747

    Google Scholar 

  • Marais RM, Hsuan JJ, McGuigan C, Wynne J, Treisman R (1992) Casein kinase II phosphorylation increases the rate of serum response factor-binding site exchange. EMBO J 11:97–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall CR, Raff EC, Raff RA (1994) Dollo's law and the death and resurrection of genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci (in press)

  • Mayr E (1982) The growth of biological thought. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinnis W, Krumlauf R (1992) Homeobox genes and axial patterning. Cell 68:283–302

    Google Scholar 

  • McKnight SL, Yamamoto KR (1992) Transcriptional regulation. Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon AP (1992) The Wnt family of developmental regulators. Trends Gent 8:236–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller DJ, Miles A (1993) Homeobox genes and the zootype. Nature 365:215–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyle WR, Campbell RK, Myers RV, Bernard MP, Han Y, Wang X (1994) Co-evolution of ligand-receptor pairs. Nature 368:251–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson DE, Pelger S (1994) A pessimistic estimate of the time required for an eye to evolve. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 256:53–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman C, Runswick M, Pollock R, Treisman R (1988) Isolation and properties of cDNA clones encoding SRF, a transcription factor that binds to the c-fos serum response element. Cell 55:989–10003

    Google Scholar 

  • Novikoff MM (1953) Regularity of form in organisms. System Zool 2:57–62

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Farrell P (1994) Unanimity waits in the wings. Nature 368:188–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Okada TS (1991) Transdifferentiation. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Overhage P (1964) Die Evolution ties Lebendigen. Herder, Freiburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Packard A (1972) Cephalopods and fish: the limits of convergence. Biol Rev 47:241–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Pao GM, Saier MH Jr (1995) Response regulators of bacterial signal transduction systems. J Mol Evol (in press)

  • Paro R (1990) Imprinting a determined state into the chromatin of Drosophila. Trends Genet 6:416–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel NH, Martin-Blanco E, Coleman KG, Poole SJ, Ellis MC, Kornberg TB, Goodman CS (1989) Expression of engrailed proteins in arthropods, annelids, and chordates. Cell 58:955–968

    Google Scholar 

  • Phan-Dinh-Tuy F, Tuil D, Schweighoffer F, Pinset C, Kahn A, Minty A (1988) The “CC.Ar.GG” box: a protein binding site common to transcription-regulatory regions of cardiac actin, c-fos, and interleukin-2 receptor genes. Eur J Biochem 173:507–515

    Google Scholar 

  • Quiring R, Walldorf U, Koter U, Gehring, WJ (1994) Homology of the eyeless gene of Drosophila to the small eye gene in mice and aniridia in humans. Science 265:785–789

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauscher III FJ, Voulalas PJ, Franza Jr BR, Curran T (1989) Fos and Jun bind cooperatively to the AP-1 site: reconstitution in vivo. Genes Dev 2:1687–1699

    Google Scholar 

  • Remane A (1952) Die Grundlagen des natürlichen Systems, der vergleichenden Anatomie und der Phylogenetik. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft Geest & Portig K.-G., Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Riddle RD, Johnson RL, Laufer E, Taboo C (1993) Sonic hedgehog mediates the polarizing activity of the ZPA. Cell 75:1401–1416

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson LM, Kerppola TK, Vendrell M, Luk D, Smeyne RJ, Bocchiaro C, Morgan JI, Curran T (in press) Regulation of c-fos expression in transgenic mice requires multiple interdependent transcription control elements.

  • Rogers KT (1964) Experimental production of perfect cyclopia by removal of the telencephalon and reversal of bilateralization in somite-stage chicks. Am J Anat 115:487–508

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer AS (1949) Time series and trends in animal evolution. In: Jepsen GL, Mayr E, Simpson GG (eds) Genetics, paleontology, and evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 103–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadowski HB, Shuai K, Darnell JE Jr, Gilman MZ (1993) A common nuclear signal transduction pathway activated by growth factor and cytokine receptors. Science 261:1739–1744

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassone-Corsi P, Sisson JC, Verma IM (1988) Transcriptional autoregulation of the protooncogene fos. Nature 334:314–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer B (1965) The role of experimentation in the origin of higher levels of organization. Syst Zool 14:245–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert FR, Nieselt-Struwe K, Gruss P (1993) The Antennapedia-type homeobox genes have evolved from three precursors separated early in metazoan evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:143–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw PE, Schröter H, Nordheim A (1989) The ability of a ternary complex to form over the serum response element correlates with serum inducibility of the human c-fos promoter. Cell 56:563–572

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheng M, Dougan ST, McFadden G, Greenberg ME (1988) Calcium and growth factor pathways of c-fos transcriptional activation require distinct upstream regulatory sequences. Mol Cell Biol 8: 2787–2796

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheng M, McFadden G, Greenberg ME (1990) Membrane depolarization and calcium induce c-fos transcription via phosphorylation of transcription factor CREB. Neuron 4:571–582

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd JCW, McGinnis W, Carrasco AE, De Robertis EM, Gehring WJ (1984) Fly and frog homoeo domains show homologies with yeast mating type regulatory proteins. Nature 310:70–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimell MJ, Ferguson EL, Childs SR, O'Connor MB (1991) The Drosophila dorsal-ventral patterning gene tolloid is related to human bone morphogenetic protein I. Cell 67:469–481

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha NR, Williams RE, Hake S (1993) Overexpression of the maize homeobox gene, Knotted-1, causes a switch from determinate to indeterminate cell fates. Genes Dev 7:787–795

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith JC (1994) Hedgehog, the floor plate, and the zone of polarizing activity. Cell 76:193–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins GI (1982) Darwin to DNA, molecules to humanity. WH Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Storm EE, Huynh TV, Copeland NG, Jenkins NA, Kingsley DM, Lee SJ (1994) Limb alterations in brachypodism mice due to mutations in a new member of the TGFβ-superfamily. Nature 368:639–643

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe PA, Loye J, Rote CA, Dickinson WJ (1993) Evolution of regulatory genes and patterns: relationships to evolutionary rates and to metabolic functions. J Mol Evol 37:590–599

    Google Scholar 

  • Tickle C (1994) On making a skeleton. Nature 368:587–588

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomarev SI, Duncan MK, Roth HJ, Cvekl A, Piatigorsky J (1994) Convergent evolution of crystalline gene regulation in squid and chicken: the AP-1/ARE connection. J Mol Evol 39 (in press)

  • Treisman R (1992) The serum response element. Trends Biochem Sci 17:423–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Treisman R (1994) Ternary complex factors: growth factor-regulated transcriptional activators. Cur Opin Genet Dev 4:96–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Trouche D, Grigoriev M, Lenormand JL, Robin P, Leibovitch SA, Sassone-Corsi P, Harel-Bellan A (1993) Repression of c-fos promoter by MyoD on muscle cell differentiation. Nature 363:79–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner BJ, Hayes TE, Hoban CJ, Cochran BH (1990) The SIF binding element confers sis/PDGF inducibility onto the c-fos promoter. EMBO J 9:4477–4484

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh K (1989) Cross-binding of factors to functionally different promoter elements in c-fos and skeletal actin genes. Mol Cell Biol 9:2191–2201

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson DMS (1951) Paleontology and modern biology. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasylyk C, Flores P, Gutman A, Wasylyk B (1989) PEAS is a nuclear target for transcription activation by non-nuclear oncogenes. EMBO J 8:3371–3378

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams JA, Carroll SB (1993) The origin, patterning and evolution of insect appendages. Bioessays 15:567–577

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams JA, Paddock SW, Vorwerk K, Carroll SB (1994) Organization of wing formation and induction of a wing-patterning gene at the dorsal/ventral compartment boundary. Nature 368:299–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Willmer EN (1970) Cytology and evolution, 2nd ed. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wistow G (1993) Lens crystallins: gene recruitment and evolutionary dynamism. Trends Biochem Sci 18:301–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf G (1990) Recent progress in vitamin A research: nuclear retinoic acid receptors and their interaction with gene elements. J Nutr Biochem 1:284–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao JJ, Lazzarini RA, Pick L (1993) The mouse Hox-1.3 gene is functionally equivalent to the Drosophila Sex combs reduced gene. Genes Dev 7:343–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Zappavigna V, Sartori D, Mavilio F (1994) Specificity of HOX protein function depends on DNA-protein and protein-protein interactions, both mediated by the homeodomain. Genes Dev 8:732–744

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerkandl E (1964) Controller-gene diseases. J Mol Biol 8:128–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerkandl E (1972) Some aspects of protein evolution. Biochimie 54:1095–1102

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerkandl E (1974) A possible role of “inert” heterochromatin in cell differentiation. Action of and competition for “locking” molecules. Biochimie 56:937–954

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerkandl E (1975) The appearance of new structures and functions in proteins during evolution. J Mol Evol 7:1–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerkandl E (1976a) Programs of gene action and progressive evolution. In: Goodman M, Tashian RE (eds) Molecular anthropology. Plenum Press, New York, pp 387–447

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerkandl E (1976b) Evolutionary processes and evolutionary noise at the molecular level, II. A selectionist model for random fixations in proteins. J Mol Evol 7:269–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerkandl E (1978) Multilocus enzymes, gene regulation, and genetic sufficiency. J Mol Evol 12:57–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerkandl E (1979) Controller node complexity: a measure of the degree of gene coordination. J Mol Evol 14:311–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerkandl E (1983) Topological and quantitative relationships in evolving genomes. In: Helène C (ed) Structure, dynamics, interactions and evolution of biological macromolecules. D Reidel Publishing, pp 395–412

  • Zuckerkandl E, Panting L (1962) Molecular disease, evolution, and genic heterogeneity. In: Kasha M, Pullman B (eds) Horizons in biochemistry. Academic Press, New York, pp 189–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerkandl E, Villet R (1988) Generation of high specificity of effect through low-specificity binding of proteins to DNA. FEBS Lett 231:291–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuker, CS (1994) On the evolution of eyes: would you like it simple or compound? Science 265:742–743

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Molecular Medical Sciences, 460 Page Mill Road, 94306, Palo Alto, CA

    Emile Zuckerkandl

Authors
  1. Emile Zuckerkandl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zuckerkandl, E. Molecular pathways to parallel evolution: I. Gene nexuses and their morphological correlates. J Mol Evol 39, 661–678 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00160412

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00160412

Key words

Search

Navigation