Log in

A comparison of soil core sampling and minirhizotrons to quantify root development of field-grown potatoes

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Root growth of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) is sensitive to soil conditions. A reduced root system size can result in reduced uptake of water and/or nutrients, leading to impaired crop growth. To understand the mechanisms by which soil conditions affect crop growth, study of temporal and spatial development of roots is required.

In field experiments, effects of soil temperature, soil compaction and potato cyst nematodes (Globodera pallida) on root growth of potato cultivars were studied using two methods: core sampling and vertically oriented minirhizotrons.

Minirhizotrons showed relatively more roots in deeper soil layers than core sampling, probably because of preferential root growth along the tube. Spatial distribution of roots should therefore be analysed by core sampling.

To eliminate differences in spatial distribution, total root systems as measured by both methods were compared. Nematodes, cultivars and time did not affect the relationship between both methods. Soil compaction, however, affected it because of a strong response of root length in bulk soil and small differences in root number against the minirhizotron, suggesting that soil coring has to be used to study effects of different bulk densities.

With both methods, sequential measurements of roots give the net effect of root growth and decay. Data on root turnover can only be obtained with minirhizotrons by comparing video recordings of different dates. Other information obtained with minirhizotrons is the average orientation of roots. Moreover, the minirhizotron method has the advantage of demanding less labour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Thailand)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Böhm W 1974 Mini-rhizotrons for root observations under field conditions. Z. Acker-Pflanzenbau 140, 282–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boone F R, Bouma J and De Smet L A H 1978 A case study on the effect of soil compaction on potato growth in a loamy sand soil. 1. Physical measurements and rooting patterns. Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 26, 405–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bragg P L, Govi G and Cannell R Q 1983 A comparison of methods, including angled and vertical minirhizotrons, for studying root growth and distribution in a spring oat crop. Plant and Soil 73, 435–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown D A and Upchurch D R 1987 Minirhizotrons: a summary of methods and instruments in current use. In Minirhizotron Observation Tubes: Methods and Applications for Measuring Rhizosphere Dynamics. Ed. H M Taylor. pp 15–30. ASA Spec. Publ. no. 50. ASA, Madison, WI, USA.

  • Buckland S T, Campbell C D, Mackie-Dawson L A, Horgan G W and Duff E I 1993 A method for counting roots observed in minirhizotrons and their theoretical conversion to root length density. Plant and Soil 153, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebskamp A G M, Bonthuis H and Huet S M 1994 70e Rassenlijst Landbouwgewassen, Aanbevelende Rassenlijst 1995, Nationale Rassenlijst 1995. CPRO-DLO, Wageningen, The Netherlands. 326 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans K and Haydock P P J 1990 A review of tolerance by potato plants of cyst nematode attack, with consideration of what factors may confer tolerance and methods of assaying and improving it in crops. Ann. Appl. Biol. 117, 703–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory P J 1979 A periscope method for observing root growth and distribution in field soil. J. Exp. Bot. 30, 205–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeraman D A and Juma N G 1993 A comparison of minirhizotron, core and monolith methods for quantifying barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and fababean (Vicia faba L.) root distribution. Plant and Soil 148, 29–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie-Dawson L A, Buckland S T, Duff E T, Pratt S M and Reid E J 1989 The use of in situ techniques for the investigation of root growth. Asp. Appl. Biol. 22, 349–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie-Dawson L A and Atkinson D 1991 Methodology for the study of roots in field experiments and the interpretation of results. In Plant Root Growth: an Ecological Perspective. Ed. D Atkinson. pp 25–47. Blackwell Sci. Publ., Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majdi H, Smucker A J M and Persson H 1992 A comparison between minirhizotron and monolith sampling methods for measuring root growth of maize (Zea mays L.). Plant and Soil 147, 127–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMichael R and Taylor H M 1987 Application and limitations of rhizotrons and minirhizotrons. In Minirhizotron Observation Tubes: Methods and Applications for Measuring Rhizosphere Dynamics. Ed. H M Taylor. pp 1–13. ASA Spec. Publ. no. 50. ASA, Madison, WI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker C J, Carr M K V, Jarvis N J, Puplampu B O and Lee V H 1991 An evaluation of the minirhizotron technique for estimating root distribution in potatoes. J. Agric. Sci. 116, 341–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smit A L, Groenwold J and Vos J 1994 The Wageningen Rhizolab-a facility to study soil-root-shoot-atmosphere interactions in crops. II. Methods of root observations. Plant and Soil 161, 289–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smucker A J M, McBurney S L and Srivastava A K 1982 Quantitative separation of roots from compacted soil profiles by the hydropneumatic elutriation system. Agron. J. 74, 500–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor H M, Upchurch D R and McMichael B L 1990 Applications and limitations of rhizotrons and minirhizotrons for root studies. Plant and Soil 129, 29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennant D 1975 A test of a modified line intersect method of estimating root length. J. Ecol 63, 995–1001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trudgill D L 1986 Yield losses caused by potato cyst nematodes: a review of the current position in Britain and prospects for improvements. Ann. Appl. Biol. 108, 181–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Oijen M, De Ruijter F J and Van Haren R 1995 Analyses of potato cyst nematode-related effects on growth, physiology and yield of potato cultivars in field plots at three levels of soil compaction. Ann. Appl. Biol. 127, 499–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vos J and Groenwold J 1983 Estimation of root densities by observation tubes and endoscope. Plant and Soil 74, 295–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vos J and Groenwold J 1987 The relation between root growth along observation tubes and in bulk soil. In Minirhizotron Observation Tubes: Methods and Applications for Measuring Rhizosphere Dynamics. Ed. H M Taylor. pp 39–49. ASA Spec. Publ. no. 50. ASA, Madison, WI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead A G 1977 Vertical distribution of potato, beet and pea cyst nematodes in some heavily infested soils. Plant Pathol. 26, 85–90.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Ruijter, F.J., Veen, B.W. & Van Oijen, M. A comparison of soil core sampling and minirhizotrons to quantify root development of field-grown potatoes. Plant Soil 182, 301–312 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00029061

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00029061

Key words

Navigation