Abstract
With this paper we review past works that have established film geography as a sub-discipline. The paper is organized around the author-text-reader (ATR) model and pays particular attention to its role in defining the area of study and how it is approached theoretically and methodologically. The textual metaphor from which the ATR model is derived is a signifying practice associated with the cultural production of meaning through various forms of representation. Textual analysis is a hermeneutical method that became hegemonic in film studies beginning in the 1970s following Christian Metz’s influential application of semiotics to film, which occurred concomitantly with the establishment of film theory as a serious discipline (c.f. Shiel 2001). The method came to geography later during the “linguistic turn” in the social sciences that did not take full effect until the late 1980s (Lukinbeal and Zimmermann 2008). While the ATR model consists of three modalities, researchers have tended to focus on only one at a time (Dixon et al. 2008). An author-centered approach focuses on the pre-filmic processes of meaning creation. Here, the emphasis is on production, labor, the auteur, the generative process of meaning creation, and the overall economic conditions within the creative industries. A text-centered approach analyzes the construction of meaning within the film’s diegesis and mise-en-scène. Reader-centered approaches investigate film as a spectatorial practice, the audience as market, the situatedness of consumption, the ethnography of film audiences, and film exhibition.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aitken, S. C. (1991). A transactional geography of the image-event: The films of Scottish director, Bill Forsyth. Transactions, 16(1), 105–118.
Aitken, S. C., & Zonn, L. E. (1993). Weir (d) sex: Representation of gender-environment relations in Peter Weir’s picnic at Hanging Rock and Gallipoli. Environment and Planning D, 11(2), 191–191.
Allen, R. C. (1990). From exhibition to reception: Reflections on the audience in film history. Screen, 31(4), 347–356.
Bagdikian, B. (1992). The media monopoly. Boston: Beacon Press.
Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation (S. F. Glaser, Trans.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Benton, L. M. (1995). Will the real/reel Los Angeles please stand up? Urban Geography, 16(2), 144–164. doi:10.2747/0272-3638.16.2.144.
Bordwell, D. (2002). Intensified continuity: Visual style in contemporary American film. Film Quarterly, 55(3), 16–28.
Bruno, G. (1993). Streetwalking on a ruined map: Cultural theory and the city films of Elvira Notari. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Bruno, G. (2002). Atlas of emotion: Journeys in art, architecture, and film. New York: Verso.
Christopherson, S. (2002). Project work in context: Regulatory change and the new geography of media. Environment and Planning A, 34(11), 2003–2015. doi:10.1068/a34182.
Christopherson, S. (2006). Behind the scenes: How transnational firms are constructing a new international division of labor in media work. Geoforum, 37(5), 739–751. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.01.003.
Christopherson, S. (2008). Beyond the self-expressive creative worker: An industry perspective on entertainment media. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(7-8), 73–95. doi:10.1177/0263276408097797.
Christopherson, S. (2013). Hollywood in decline? US film and television producers beyond the era of fiscal crisis. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 6(1), 141–157. doi:10.1093/cjres/rss024.
Christopherson, S., & Rightor, N. (2010). The creative economy as “Big Business”: Evaluating state strategies to lure filmmakers. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 29(3), 336–352.
Christopherson, S., & Storper, M. (1986). The city as studio; the world as back lot: The impact of vertical disintegration on the location of the motion picture industry. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 4(3), 305–320.
Christopherson, S., & Storper, M. (1989). The effects of flexible specialization on industrial politics and the labor market: The motion picture industry. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 42(3), 331–347.
Clarke, D. B. (1997). The cinematic city. New York: Routledge.
Clarke, D. B., & Doel, M. A. (2006). From flatland to vernacular relativity: The genesis of early English landscapes. In M. Lefebvre (Ed.), Landscape and film. New York: Routledge.
Clarke, D. B., & Doel, M. A. (2007). Shooting space, tracking time: The city from animated photography to vernacular relativity. Cultural Geographies, 14(4), 589–609. doi:10.1177/1474474007082295.
Coe, N. (2000a). The view from out West: Embeddedness, inter-personal relations and the development of an indigenous film industry in Vancouver. Geoforum, 31, 391–407.
Coe, N. (2000b). On location: American capital and the local labour market in the Vancouver film industry. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(1), 79–94.
Craine, J., & Hadi Curti, G. (2013). Prologue: Introducing the fight to stay put: Social lessons through media imaginings of urban transformation and change. In G. Hadi Curti, J. Craine, & S. C. Aitken (Eds.), The fight to stay put: Social lessons through media imaginings of urban transformation and change (pp. 9–18). Stuttgart: Franz-Steiner Verlag.
Craine, J., Hadi Curti, G., & Aitken, S. C. (2013). Cosmopolitan sex, monstrous violence and networks of blood. In G. Hadi Curti, J. Craine, & S. C. Aitken (Eds.), The fight to stay put: Social lessons through media imaginings of urban transformation and change (pp. 249–265). Stuttgart: Franz-Steiner Verlag.
Crang, M. A. (2002). Rethinking the observer: Film, mobility, and the construction of the subject. In T. Cresswell & D. Dixon (Eds.), Engaging film: Geographies of mobility and identity (pp. 13–31). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Cresswell, T., & Dixon, D. (Eds.). (2002). Engaging film: Geographies of mobility and identity. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Derrida, J. (1998). Of grammatology (G. C. Spivak, Trans.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Dixon, D., Zonn, L., & Bascom, J. (2008). Post-ing the cinema: Reassessing analytical stances toward a geography of film. In C. Lukinbeal & S. Zimmermann (Eds.), The geography of cinema – A cinematic world (pp. 25–50). Stuttgart: Franz-Steiner Verlag.
Dodds, K. (2013). “I”m still not crossing that’: Borders, dispossession, and sovereignty in frozen river (2008). Geopolitics, 18(3), 560–583. doi:10.1080/14650045.2012.749243.
Doel, M. A. (2008). From animated photography to film: The formation of vernacular relativity in early English films (1895–1908). In C. Lukinbeal & S. Zimmermann (Eds.), The geography of cinema – A cinematic world (pp. 87–100). Stuttgart: Franz-Steiner Verlag.
Doel, M. A., & Clarke, D. B. (2007). Afterimages. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 25(5), 890–910. doi:10.1068/d436t.
Elsaesser, T. (2005). European cinema face to face with Hollywood. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Fletchall, A., Lukinbeal, C., & McHugh, K. (2012). Place, television, and the real Orange County. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
Friedberg, A. (1993). Window shop**: Cinema and the postmodern. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gasher, M. (1995). The audiovisual locations industry in Canada: Considering British Columbia as Hollywood north. Canadian Journal of Communication, 20(2), 231–254.
Gasher, M. (2002). Hollywood north: The feature film industry in British Columbia. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
Gledhill, C. (1998 [1988]). Pleasurable negotiations. In J. Storey (Ed.), Cultural theory and popular culture: A reader. Essex: Prentice Hall.
Glynn, K., & Cupples, J. (2014). Negotiating and queering US hegemony in TV drama: Popular geopolitics and cultural studies. Gender, Place, & Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography. doi:10.1080/0966369X.2013.855711.
Godfrey, B. J. (1993). Regional depiction in contemporary film. Geographical Review, 83(4), 428–440.
Gold, J. (1984). The city in film: A bibliography. Architecture series: Bibliography. Monticello: Vance Bibliographies.
Hanson, M. (1990). Adventures of goldilocks: Spectatorship, consumerism and public life. Camera Obscura, 22, 51–71.
Hanson, M. (1991). Babel and Babylon: Spectatorship in American silent film. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Harvey, D. (1990). The condition of postmodernity: An enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Malden: Blackwell Publishers Inc.
Hopkins, J. (1994). A Map** of cinematic places: Icons, ideology, and the power of (Mis)representation. In S. Aitken & L. Zonn (Eds.), Place, power, situation, and spectacle: A geography of film. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Jancovich, M., Faire, L., & Stubbings, S. (2003). The place of the audience: Cultural geographies of film consumption. London: British Film Institute.
Jones, J. P., III, & Natter, W. (1999). Space “and” representation. In A. Buttimer, S. D. Brunn, & U. Wardenga (Eds.), Text and image: Social construction of regional knowledges (pp. 234–237). Leipzig: Institut für Länderkunde.
Kirby, K. (1996). Indifferent boundaries: Spatial concepts of human subjectivity. New York: The Guilford Press.
Klinger, B. (2006). Beyond the multiplex cinema, new technologies, and the home. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Laine, T. (2006). Cinema as second skin. New Review of Film and Television, 4(2), 93–106.
Lukinbeal, C. (1998). Reel-to-real urban geographies: The top five cinematic cities in North America. California Geographer, 38(1), 65–78.
Lukinbeal, C. (2004). The rise of regional film production centers in North America, 1984–1997. GeoJournal, 59(4), 307–321.
Lukinbeal, C. (2006). Runaway Hollywood: Cold Mountain, Romania. Erdkunde, 4, 337–345.
Lukinbeal, C. (2009). Film. In R. Kitchin & N. Thrift (Eds.), International encyclopaedia of human geography (Vol. 4, pp. 125–129). Oxford: Elsevier Press.
Lukinbeal, C. (2010). Film and geography. In B. Warf (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human geography (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Lukinbeal, C. (2012). “On location” filming in San Diego County from 1985–2005: How a cinematic landscape is formed through incorporative tasks and represented through mapped inscriptions. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102(1), 171–190. doi:10.1080/00045608.2011.583574.
Lukinbeal, C., & Aitken, S. (1998). Sex, violence and the weather: Male hysteria, scale and the fractal geographies of patriarchy. In H. Nast & S. Pile (Eds.), Places through the body (pp. 356–380). New York: Routledge.
Lukinbeal, C., & Zimmermann, S. (Eds.). (2008). The geography of cinema – A cinematic world. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
Marie, L. (2001). Jacques Tati’s Play Time as the new Babylon. In M. Shiel & T. Fitzmaurice (Eds.), Cinema and the city: Film and urban societies in a global context (pp. 257–269). Oxford: Blackwell.
Mayer, V. (2011). Below the line: Producers and production studies in the new television economy. Durham: Duke University Press.
Mayne, J. (1993). Cinema and spectatorship. New York: Routledge.
Merritt, R. (1979). Nickelodeon theaters: Building an audience for the movies. Wide Angle, 1, 4–9.
Miller, T., Covil, N., McMurrin, J., Maxwell, R., & Wang, T. (2005). Global Hollywood 2. London: British Film Institute.
Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. Screen, 16(3), 6–18.
Natter, W., & Jones, J. P., III. (1993a). Signposts toward a poststructuralist geography. In J. P. Jones III, W. Natter, & T. R. Schatzki (Eds.), Postmodern contentions: Epochs, politics, space (pp. 165–203). New York: Guilford Press.
Natter, W., & Jones, J. P. (1993b). Pets or meat: Class, ideology, and space in Roger & Me. Antipode, 25(2), 140–158.
Sarris, A. (1962). Notes on the auteur theory in 1962. Film Culture, Winter 1962–1963, 27, 1–8.
Scott, A. (2005). On Hollywood: The place, the industry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Shiel, M. (2001). Cinema and the city in history and theory. In M. Shiel & T. Fitzmaurice (Eds.), Cinema and the city: Film and urban societies in a global context. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Starrs, P. (1993). The ways of western death: Mor(t)ality and landscape in Cormac McCarthy’s novels and Sergio Leone’s films. Wide Angle: A Quarterly Journal of Film History, Theory, Criticism, and Practice, 15(4), 62–76.
Stinger, J. (2001). Global cities and the international film festival economy. In M. Shiel & T. Fitzmaurice (Eds.), Cinema and the city: Film and urban societies in global context (pp. 134–144). Malden: Blackwell Publishers Inc.
Storper, M. (1989). The transition to flexible specialization in the U.S. film industry: External economies, the division of labour, and the crossing of industrial divides. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 13(2), 273–305.
Storper, M. (1997). The regional world: Territorial development in a global economy. New York: Guilford Press.
Storper, M., & Christopherson, S. (1985). The changing organization and location of the motion picture industry (Research report R854). Los Angeles: Graduate School of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of California.
Storper, M., & Christopherson, S. (1987). Flexible specialization and regional industrial agglomerations: The case of the U.S. motion picture industry. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 77(1), 104–117. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1987.tb00148.x.
Wong, C. H. (2011). Film festivals culture, people, and power on the global screen. Piscataway: Rutgers University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sharp, L., Lukinbeal, C. (2015). Film Geography: A Review and Prospectus. In: Mains, S., Cupples, J., Lukinbeal, C. (eds) Mediated Geographies and Geographies of Media. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9969-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9969-0_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9968-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9969-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)