Abstract
As there is no evidence for any shear along, or major extension across, the Ethiopian Rift, the spreading histories of the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden should be very similar. To test this, magnetic anomaly profiles for the two regions are converted to the pole for direct comparison. There appear to be some considerable differences and possible reasons for these are discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R. Freund, Geol. Mag. 102, 189, 1965.
R.W. Girdler and P. Styles, Nature, 247, 7, 1974.
H.A. Roeser, Geol. Jb., D13, 131, 1975.
R.W. Girdler and P. Styles, Nature, In preparation.
R. BlakEny and A. Cox, J.G.R., 77, 4339, 1972.
S.B. Frazier, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., 267, 131, 1970.
A.S. Laughton, R.B. Whitmarsh and M.T. Jones, Phil.Trans. Roy. Soc., 267, 1970.
J.D. LowEnl and G.J. Genik, Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol., 56, 247, 1972.
R.F. NEnson, Personal communication.
P. Jones, Nature, 261, 567, 1976
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1978 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Noy, D.J. (1978). A Comparison of Magnetic Anomalies in the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden. In: Ramberg, I.B., Neumann, ER. (eds) Tectonics and Geophysics of Continental Rifts. NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series, vol 37. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9806-3_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9806-3_22
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-9808-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9806-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive