Abstract
Along with the development of scientific disciplines, namely social sciences, hypothesized relationships become increasingly more complex. Besides the examination of direct effects, researchers are more and more interested in moderating effects. Moderating effects are evoked by variables whose variation influences the strength or the direction of a relationship between an exogenous and an endogenous variable. Investigators using partial least squares path modeling need appropriate means to test their models for such moderating effects. We illustrate the identification and quantification of moderating effects in complex causal structures by means of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling. We also show that group comparisons, i.e. comparisons of model estimates for different groups of observations, represent a special case of moderating effects by having the grou** variable as a categorical moderator variable. We provide profound answers to typical questions related to testing moderating effects within PLS path models:
-
1.
How can a moderating effect be drawn in a PLS path model, taking into account that the available software only permits direct effects?
-
2.
How does the type of measurement model of the independent and the moderator variables influence the detection of moderating effects?
-
3.
Before the model estimation, should the data be prepared in a particular manner? Should the indicators be centered (by having a mean of zero), standardized (by having a mean of zero and a standard deviation of one), or manipulated in any other way?
-
4.
How can the coefficients of moderating effects be estimated and interpreted?And, finally:
-
5.
How can the significance of moderating effects be determined?
Borrowing from the body of knowledge on modeling interaction effect within multiple regression, we develop a guideline on how to test moderating effects in PLS path models. In particular, we create a graphical representation of the necessary steps to take and decisions to make in the form of a flow chart. Starting with the analysis of the type of data available, via the measurement model specification, the flow chart leads the researcher through the decisions on how to prepare the data and how to model the moderating effect. The flow chart ends with the bootstrap**, as the preferred means to test significance, and the final interpretation of the model outcomes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(1), 1173–1182.
Bass, F., & Wittink, D. (1975). Pooling issues and methods in regression analysis with examples in marketing research. Journal of Marketing Research, 12(4), 414–425.
Bollen, K. A., & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110(2), 305–314.
Carte, T. A., & Russell, C. J. (2003). In pursuit of moderation: Nine common errors and their solutions. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 479–501.
Chin, W., & Dibbern, J. (2010). A permutation based procedure for multi-group PLS analysis: results of tests of differences on simulated data and a cross cultural analysis of the sourcing of information system services between germany and the USA. In: V. Esposito Vinzi, W. Chin, J. Hensler, and H. Wold (Eds.,) Handbook of partial least squares, Heidelberg: Springer.
Chin, W. W. (2010). Bootstrap cross-validation indices for PLS path model assessment. In V. Esposito Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of Partial Least Squares. Heidelberg: Springer.
Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. N. (2003). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: results from a monte carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 189–217.
Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (1996). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects. Results from a monte carlo simulation study and voice mail Emotion/Adoption study. In J. I. DeGross, S. Jarvenpaa, & A. Srinivasan (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Information Systems, pp. 21–41, Cleveland, OH.
Chow, G. (1978). Test of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrika, 28, 591–605.
Cohen, J. (1978). Partialed products Are interactions; partialed powers Are curve components. Psychological Bulletin, 85(4), 858–866.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cortina, J. M. (1993). Interaction, nonlinearity, and multicollinearity: Implications for multiple regression. Journal of Management, 19, 915–922.
Cronbach, L. J. (1987). Statistical tests for moderator variables: Flaws in analysis recently proposed. Psychological Bulletin, 102(3), 414–417.
Diamantopoulos, A., & Winklhofer, H. M. (2001). Index construction with formative indicators: an alternative to scale development. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 269–277.
Eberl, M. (2010). An application of PLS in multi-group analysis: the need for differentiated corporate-level marketing in the mobile communications industry. In: V. Esposito Vinzi, W. Chin, J. Hensler, and H. Wold (Eds.,) Handbook of partial least squares, Heidelberg: Springer.
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall.
Eggert, A., Fassott, G., & Helm, S. (2005). Identifizierung und quantifizierung mediierender und moderierender effekte in komplexen kausalstrukturen. In F. Bliemel, A. Eggert, G. Fassott, & J. Henseler (Eds.), Handbuch PLS-Pfadmodellierung. Methode, Anwendung, Praxisbeispiele. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.
Esposito Vinzi, V. (2010). PLS Path Modeling: From Foundations to Recent Developments and Open Issues for Model Assessment and Improvement. In V. Esposito Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of Partial Least Squares. Heidelberg: Springer.
Finney, J. W., Mitchell, R. E., Cronkite, R. C., & Moos, R. H. (1984). Methodological issues in estimating main and interactive effects: Examples from co**/social support and stress field. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 25, 85–98.
Guinot, C., Mauger, E., Malvy, D., Latreille, J., Ambroisine, L., Ezzedine, K., Galan, P., Hercberg, S., & Tenenhaus, M. (2010). Use of ULS-SEM and PLS-SEM to Measure a Group Effect in a Regression Model Relating Two Blocks of Binary Variables. In V. Esposito Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of Partial Least Squares. Heidelberg: Springer.
Gujarati, D. (2003). Basic econometrics, 4th Edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Helm, S., Eggert, A., & Garnefeld, I. (2010). Modelling the impact of corporate reputation on customer satisfaction and loyalty using PLS. In V. Esposito Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of Partial Least Squares. Heidelberg: Springer.
Homburg, C., & Giering, A. (2001). Personal characteristics as moderators of the relationship between customer satisfaction and loyalty: An empirical analysis. Psychology & Marketing, 18(1), 43–66.
Irwin, J. R., & McClelland, G. H. (2001). Misleading heuristics and moderated multiple regression models. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(1), 100–109.
Jaccard, J., & Turrisi, R. (2003). Interaction effects in multiple regression, 2nd Edn. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Jarvis, C. B., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 199–218.
Jonsson, F. Y. (1998). Nonlinear structural equation models: The Kenny–Judd model with interaction effects. In R. E. Schumacker, & G. A. Marcoulides (Eds.), Interaction and nonlinear effects in structural equation modeling (pp. 17–42). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Wang, F. (1996). Nonlinear structural equation models: The Kenny–Judd model with interaction effects. In G. A. Marcoulides, & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: issues and techniques (pp. 57–88). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (1984). Estimating the nonlinear and interactive effects of latent variables. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 201–210.
Lohmöller, J.-B. (1989). Latent variable path modeling with partial least squares. Heidelberg: Physica.
Marquardt, D. W. (1980). You should standardize the predictor variables in your regression models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75, 87–91.
Pedhazur, E. J. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Reinecke, J. (1999). Interaktionseffekte in Strukturgleichungsmodellen mit der Theorie des geplanten Verhaltens. Multiple Gruppenvergleiche und Produktterme mit latenten Variablen. ZUMA-Nachrichten, 23(45), 88–114.
Rigdon, E. E., Schumacker, R. E., & Wothke, W. (1998). A comparative review of interaction and nonlinear modeling. In R. E. Schumacker, & G. A. Marcoulides (Eds.), Interaction and nonlinear effects in structural equation modeling, (pp. 1–16). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Sharma, S., Durand, R. M., & Gur-Arie, O. (1981). Identification and analysis of moderator variables. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 291–300.
Smith, K. W., & Sasaki, M. S. (1979). Decreasing multicollinearity: a method for models with multiplicative functions. Sociological Methods and Research, 8, 35–56.
Streukens, S., Wetzels, M., Daryanto, A., & de Ruyter, K. (2010). Analyzing Factorial Data Using PLS: Application in an Online Complaining Context. In V. Esposito Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of Partial Least Squares. Heidelberg: Springer.
Tate, R. L. (1984). Limitations of centering for interactive models. Sociological Methods and Research, 13, 251–271.
Temme, C., & Kreis, H. (2010). A Comparison of Current PLS Path Modeling Software: Features, Ease-of-Use, and Performance. In V. Esposito Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of Partial Least Squares. Heidelberg: Springer.
Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y.-M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48(1), 159–205.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Henseler, J., Fassott, G. (2010). Testing Moderating Effects in PLS Path Models: An Illustration of Available Procedures. In: Esposito Vinzi, V., Chin, W., Henseler, J., Wang, H. (eds) Handbook of Partial Least Squares. Springer Handbooks of Computational Statistics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8_31
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-32825-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32827-8
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)