Translating Analytical Descriptions of Cities into Planning and Simulation Models

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Design Computing and Cognition '16

Abstract

With the increase in urban complexity, plausible analytical and design models became highly valued as the way to decode and reconstruct the organization that makes urban systems. What they lacked is a mechanism by which an analytical description of urban complexity could be translated into a design description. An attempt to define such a mechanism is presented in this paper, where knowledge is retrieved from the natural organization that cities settle into, and devised in a procedural model to support urban planning at the problem definition stage. The model comprises two automated modules, giving preference to street accessibility. The first module implements plausible spatial laws to generate street structures. The performance criteria of these structures are measured against accessibility scores and clustering patterns of street segments. In the second module, an Artificial Neural Networks model (ANNs) is trained on Barcelona’s data, outlining how street width, building height, block density and retail land use might be dependent on street accessibility. The ANNs is tested on Manhattan’s data. The application of the two computational modules is explored at the problem definition stage of a urban planning in order to verify how far deterministic knowledge-based models are in the transition from analysis to design. Our findings suggest that the computational framework proposed could be instrumental at generating simplified representation of an urban grid, whilst being effective at forecasting form-related and functional attributes within a minimum resolution of 200 m. It is finally concluded that as design progresses, knowledge-based models may serve as to minimize uncertainty about complex urban planning problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    MLP consists of multiple layers of simple, two state, sigmoid processing nodes/neurons that interact using weighted connections.

  2. 2.

    Accuracy can be calculated from the contingency table as follows; ((True Positives) + (True Negatives))/((True Positives) + (True Negatives) + (False Positives) + (False Negatives)).

  3. 3.

    Sensitivity = True Positives/((True Positives) + (False Negatives)).

  4. 4.

    Specificity = False Positives/((False Positives) + (True Negatives)).

  5. 5.

    Successful scores are where there is an agreement between predicted change and true change.

  6. 6.

    Misses are where there are no change predicted but change actually occurred.

  7. 7.

    False alarms are where there is change predicted but no change actually occurred.

References

  • Al-Sayed K (2012) Space Syntax as a parametric model. In: Proceedings of the Fall 2011 PUARL international conference, Oregon

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Sayed K (2014a) Thinking systems in urban design: a prioritised structure model. In: Carmona M (ed) Explorations in urban design. Ashgate, Farnham, pp 169–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Sayed K (2014b) A systematic approach towards creative urban design. In: Gero JS (ed) Design computing and cognition DCC’12. © Springer 2014, pp 133–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Sayed K, Turner A, Hanna S (2010) Modelling the spatial morphogenesis in cities: the dynamics of spatial change in Manhattan. In: Timmermans HJP (ed) Proceedings of the 10th international conference on design and decision support systems in architecture and urban planning, Eindhoven

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Sayed K, Turner A, Hanna S (2012) Generative structures in cities. In: Greene M, Reyes J, Castro A (eds) Proceedings of the 8th international space syntax symposium, Santiago de Chile, PUC

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander C (1964) Notes on the synthesis of form. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander C, Ishikawa S, Silverstein M (1977) A pattern language: towns, buildings, construction, vol 2. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexiou K, Johnson J, Zamenopoulos T (eds) (2010) Embracing complexity in design. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Banister D, Penn A, Hillier B, Xu J (1998) Configurational modelling of urban movement networks. Environ Plan 25(1):59–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barthélemy M (2011) Spatial networks. Phys Rep 499(1):1–101

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Batty M (2005) Cities and complexity: understanding cities with cellular automata, agent-based models, and fractals. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Batty M (2010) Networks, flows, and geometry in cities: a challenge to space syntax. J Space Syntax 1(2):366

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Batty M, Carvalho R, Hudson-Smith A, Milton R, Smith D, Steadman P (2008) Scaling and allometry in the building geometries of Greater London. Eur Phys J B 63(3):303–314

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bettencourt LM, Lobo J, Helbing D, Kühnert C, West GB (2007) Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(17):7301–7306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown FE, Johnson JH (1985) An interactive computer model of urban development: the rules governing the morphology of mediaeval London. Environ Plan 12(4):377–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conroy R (2001) Spatial navigation in immersive virtual environments. Doctoral dissertation, University College London

    Google Scholar 

  • Derix C, Gamlesæter Å, Miranda P, Helme L, Kropf K (2012) Simulation heuristics for urban design. In: Digital urban modeling and simulation. Springer, Berlin, pp 159–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietzel C, Herold M, Hemphill JJ, Clarke KC (2005) Spatio-temporal dynamics in California’s central valley: empirical links to urban theory. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 19(2):175–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duarte JP, Rocha JM, Soares GD (2007) Unveiling the structure of the Marrakech medina: a shape grammar and an interpreter for generating urban form. AI EDAM 21(4):317–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Duarte JP, Beirão JN, Montenegro N, Gil J (2012) City Induction: a model for formulating, generating, and evaluating urban designs. In: Digital urban modeling and simulation. Springer, Berlin, pp 73–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Foody GM (1996) Relating the land cover composition of mixed pixels to artificial neural network classification output. Photogram Eng Remote Sensing 62:491–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong P (1996) Integrated analysis of spatial data from multiple sources using evidential reasoning and artificial neural-network techniques for geological map**. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing 62:513–523

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanna S (2012) A representational scheme for the extraction of urban genotypes. In: Gero JS (ed) Design computing and cognition DCC’12. © Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier B (1996) Space is the machine. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier B (2002) A theory of the city as object: or, how spatial laws mediate the social construction of urban space. Urban Design Int 7:153–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillier B, Hanson J (1984) The social logic of space. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hillier B, Iida S (2005) Network and psychological effects in urban movement. In: Cohn AG, Mark DM (eds) Proceedings of spatial information theory: international conference 2005. COSIT, Ellicottsville, pp 468–476

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier B, Yang T, Turner A (2012) Normalising least angle choice in Depthmap—and how it opens up new perspectives on the global and local analysis of city space. J Space Syntax 3(2):155–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs J (1961) Death and life of Great American Cities—the failure of town planning. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang B (2007) A topological pattern of urban street networks: universality and peculiarity. Phys A 384(2):647–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karimi K (2012) A configurational approach to analytical urban design: ‘Space Syntax’ methodology. Urban Design Int 17(4):297–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lämmer S, Gehlsen B, Helbing D (2006) Scaling laws in the spatial structure of urban road networks. Phys A 363(1):89–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilliefors HW (1967) On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality with mean and variance unknown. J Am Stat Assoc 64:399–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus L (2010) Spatial capital. J Space Syntax 1(1):30–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall S (2012) Science, pseudo-science and urban design. Urban Design International 17(4):257–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira V (2013) Morpho, a methodology for assessing urban form. Urban Morphol 17(1):149–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Openshaw S, Openshaw C (1997) Artificial intelligence in geography. Wiley, Chichester

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ozbil A, Peponis J, Stone B (2011) Understanding the link between street connectivity, land use and pedestrian flows. Urban Design Int 16:125–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parish YI, Müller P (2001) Procedural modeling of cities. In: Proceedings of the 28th annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques. ACM, New York, pp 301–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Porta S, Latora V, Wang F, Rueda S, Strano E, Scellato S, Latora L (2012) Street centrality and the location of economic activities in Barcelona. Urban Stud 49(7):1471–1488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portugali J, Meyer H, Stolk E, Tan E (eds) (2012) Complexity theories of cities have come of age: an overview with implications to urban planning and design. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratti C (2004) Urban texture and space syntax: some inconsistencies. Environ Plan 31(4):487–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratti C, Richens P (1999) Urban texture analysis with image processing techniques. In: Computers in building. Springer US, New York, pp 49–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL (eds) (1986) Parallel distributed processing, vol 1. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ (1986) Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 323:533–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siksna A (1997) The effects of block size and form in North American and Australian city centres. Urban Morphol 1(1):19–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanilov K, Batty M (2011) Exploring the historical determinants of urban growth patterns through cellular automata. Trans GIS 15(3):253–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiny G (1981) A note on the description of designs. Environ Plan 8:257–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teeling C (1996) Algorithmic design: generating urban form, vol 2, pp 89–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner A (2000) Angular analysis: a method for the quantification of space. Working paper 23, Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis. UCL, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner A (2011) UCL Depthmap: Spatial network analysis software, version 10. University College London, VR Centre of the Built Environment, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu F (2002) Complexity and urban simulation: towards a computational laboratory. In: Geography Research Forum. Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Press, pp 22–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu N, Silva EA (2009) Artificial intelligence and ‘waves of complexity’ for urban dynamics. In: Proceedings of 8th WSEAS international conference on artificial intelligence, knowledge engineering and data bases (AIKED ‘09), pp 459–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye Y, Van Nes A (2012) New ways of spatial modelling: making spatial diagnosis in combining space syntax, spacematrix and MXI with GIS of New and Old Towns. In: New urban configurations: EAAE/ISUF international conference, Delft, October, pp 16–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng X, Zhao L, Su Y Yan G, Wang S (2010) An extension method of space syntax and application, advancing computing, communication, control and management. Lecture Notes Electr Eng 56:7–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kinda Al-Sayed .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Al-Sayed, K., Penn, A. (2017). Translating Analytical Descriptions of Cities into Planning and Simulation Models. In: Gero, J. (eds) Design Computing and Cognition '16. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44989-0_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44989-0_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44988-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44989-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation