Abstract
In order to be effective, collective decision-making strategies need to be not only fast and accurate, but sufficiently general to be ported and reused across different problem domains. In this paper, we propose a novel problem scenario, collective perception, and use it to compare three different strategies: the DMMD, DMVD, and DC strategies. The robots are required to explore their environment, estimate the frequency of certain features, and collectively perceive which feature is the most frequent. We implemented the collective perception scenario in a swarm robotics system composed of 20 e-pucks and performed robot experiments with all considered strategies. Additionally, we also deepened our study by means of physics-based simulations. The results of our performance comparison in the collective perception scenario are in agreement with previous results for a different problem domain and support the generality of the considered strategies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
The DMVD strategy was originally named the weighted voter model.
- 2.
- 3.
See http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/supp/IridiaSupp2016-002/ for videos of the experiments.
References
Campo, A., Garnier, S., Dédriche, O., Zekkri, M., Dorigo, M.: Self-organized discrimination of resources. PLoS ONE 6(5), e19888 (2010)
Dorigo, M., et al.: Swarm robotics. Scholarpedia 9(1), 1463 (2014)
Edwards, S.C., Pratt, S.C.: Rationality in collective decision-making by ant colonies. Proc. R. Soc. B 276(1673), 3655–3661 (2009)
Gutiérrez, M., et al.: Open e-puck range & bearing miniaturized board for local communication in swarm robotics. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA 2009, pp. 3111–3116 (2009)
Kernbach, S., et al.: Re-embodiment of honeybee aggregation behavior in an artificial micro-robotic system. Adapt. Behav. 17(3), 237–259 (2009)
Kornienko, S., et al.: Cognitive micro-agents: individual and collective perception in microrobotic swarm. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI 2005 Workshop on Agents in Real-Time and Dynamic Environments, Edinburgh, UK, pp. 33–42 (2005)
Mermoud, G., et al.: Aggregation-mediated collective perception and action in a group of miniature robots. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2010, pp. 599–606. IFAAMAS (2010)
Mondada, F., et al.: The e-puck, a robot designed for education in engineering. In: Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Autonomous Robot Systems and Competitions, vol. 1, pp. 59–65. IPCB (2009)
Montes de Oca, M., et al.: Majority-rule opinion dynamics with differential latency: a mechanism for self-organized collective decision-making. Swarm Intell. 5, 305–327 (2011)
Pinciroli, C., et al.: ARGoS: a modular, parallel, multi-engine simulator for multi-robot systems. Swarm Intell. 6(4), 271–295 (2012)
Schmickl, T., Möslinger, C., Crailsheim, K.: Collective perception in a robot swarm. In: Şahin, E., Spears, W.M., Winfield, A.F.T. (eds.) SAB 2006 Ws 2007. LNCS, vol. 4433, pp. 144–157. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Tarapore, D., et al.: Abnormality detection in multiagent systems inspired by the adaptive immune system. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2013, pp. 23–30. IFAAMAS (2013)
Valentini, G., et al.: Efficient decision-making in a self-organizing robot swarm: on the speed versus accuracy trade-off. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2015, pp. 1305–1314. IFAAMAS (2015)
Valentini, G., Ferrante, E., Hamann, H., Dorigo, M.: Collective decision with 100 Kilobots: speed versus accuracy in binary discrimination problems. Auton. Agent. Multi-Agent Syst. 30(3), 553–580 (2016)
Valentini, G., Hamann, H., Dorigo, M.: Self-organized collective decision making: the weighted voter model. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2014, pp. 45–52. IFAAMAS (2014)
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank A. Reina, L. Garattoni, and A. Antoun for their assistance during the development of this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Valentini, G., Brambilla, D., Hamann, H., Dorigo, M. (2016). Collective Perception of Environmental Features in a Robot Swarm. In: Dorigo, M., et al. Swarm Intelligence. ANTS 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9882. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44427-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44427-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44426-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44427-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)