Capturing, Reporting, and Learning from Adverse Events

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Surgical Patient Care

Abstract

Research studies have validated an epidemic of grossly underreported, preventable injuries due to medical management. Recent policy aims have placed high priority on improving incident reporting as the first step in addressing patient injuries and have called for translation of lessons from other industries. Complex nonmedical industries have evolved incident reporting systems that focus on near misses, provide incentives for voluntary reporting, ensure confidentiality while bolstering accountability, and emphasize a systems approach to data collection, analysis, and improvement. Reporting of near misses over adverse events offers numerous benefits, greater frequency allowing quantitative analysis, fewer barriers to data collection, limited liability, and recovery patterns that can be captured, studied, and used for improvement. Education and engagement of all healthcare stakeholders, including patients and caregivers, and negotiation of their conflicting goals will be necessary to change the balance of barrier incentives in favor of implementing effective surgical reporting systems.

“… The value of history lies in the fact that we learn by it from the mistakes of others, as opposed to learning from our own which is a slow process.”

—W. Stanley Sykes, 1894–1961

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 139.09
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 176.54
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 246.09
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sykes WS. Dedication to, Essays on the first hundred years of anesthesia, vol. 1. London: Churchill Livingston; 1960. p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barach P. The end of the beginning. J Legal Med. 2003;24:7–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Small DS, Barach P. Patient safety and health policy: a history and review. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2002;16(6):1463–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Evans SM, Berry JG, Smith BJ, et al. Anonymity or transparency in reporting of medical error: a community‐based survey in South Australia. Med J Aust. 2004;180:577–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cassin B, Barach P. Making sense of root cause analysis investigations of surgery-related adverse events. Surg Clin N Am. 2012, 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.suc.2011.12.008.

  6. Kohn LT, Corrigan J, Donaldson MS. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington: National Academy Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cassin B, Barach P. Balancing clinical team perceptions of the workplace: applying ‘work domain analysis’ to pediatric cardiac care. Prog Pediatr Cardiol. doi:10.1016/j.ppedcard.2011.12.005.

  8. Barach P, Phelps G. Clinical sensemaking: a systematic approach to reduce the impact of normalised deviance in the medical profession. J R Soc Med. 2013;106(10):387–90. doi:10.1177/0141076813505045.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Flink M, Bergenbrant Glas S, Airosa F, Öhlén G, Barach P, Hansagi H, Brommels M, Olsson M. Patient-centered handovers between hospital and primary health care: an assessment of medical records. Int J Med Inform. 2015;84(5):355–62. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.01.009. Epub 2015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Barach P. The impact of the patient safety movement on clinical care. Adv Anesth. 2003;21:51–80.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cited in the Oxford Dictionary, Oxford University Press, London, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nebeker J, Samore M, Barach P. Clarifying adverse drug events: a clinicians guide to terminology, documentation, and reporting. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140(10):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. National Research Council, Assembly of Engineering, Committee on FF Airworthiness Certification Procedures. Improving aircraft safety: FAA certification of commercial passenger aircraft. Washington: National Academy of Sciences; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Runciman WB, Williamson JA, Deakin A, Benveniste KA, Bannon K, Hibbert PD. An integrated framework for safety, quality and risk management: an information and incident management system based on a universal patient safety classification. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15 Suppl 1:i82–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. World Alliance For Patient Safety Drafting Group, Sherman H, Castro G, Fletcher M; World Alliance for Patient Safety, Hatlie M, Hibbert P, Jakob R, Koss R, Lewalle P, Loeb J, Perneger T, Runciman W, Thomson R, Van Der Schaaf T, Virtanen M. Towards an International Classification for Patient Safety: the conceptual framework. Int J Qual Health Care. 2009;21(1):2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Runciman WB. Shared meanings: preferred terms and definitions for safety and quality concepts. Med J Aust. 2006;184(10 Suppl):S41–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. de Feijter JM, de Grave WS, Muijtjens AM, Scherpbier AJ, Koopmans RP. A comprehensive overview of medical error in hospitals using incident-reporting systems, patient complaints and chart review of inpatient deaths. PLoS One. 2012;7(2), e31125.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Fischhoff B. Hindsight does not equal foresight: the effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1975;1:288–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wu AW, Pronovost P, Morlock L. ICU incident reporting systems. J Crit Care. 2002;17(2):86–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bilimoria KY, Kmiecik TE, DaRosa DA, Halverson A, Eskandari MK, Bell Jr RH, Soper NJ, Wayne JD. Development of an online morbidity, mortality, and near-miss reporting system to identify patterns of adverse events in surgical patients. Arch Surg. 2009;144(4):305–11. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2009.5. discussion 311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Freestone L, Bolsin SN, Colson M, Patrick A, Creati B. Int J Qual Health Care. 2006;18:452–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Leape LL. Reporting adverse event. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(20):1633–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Barach P, Small DS. Patient safety: beginning the dialogue with the health services research community. J Health Serv Res. 2001;(2):67–70.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Davis R, Barach P. Increasing patient safety and reducing medical error: the role of preventive medicine. Am J Prev Health. 2000;19(3):202–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Heard GC, Sanderson PM, Thomas RD. Barriers to adverse event and error reporting in anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2012;114(3):604–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Howard J, Levy F, Mareiniss DP, Patch M, Craven CK, McCarthy M, Epstein-Peterson ZD, Wong V, Pronovost P. New legal protections for reporting patient errors under the Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act: a review of the medical literature and analysis. J Patient Saf. 2010;6(3):147–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hanson C, Barach P. Improving cardiac care quality and safety through partnerships with patients and their families. Prog Pediatr Cardiol. 2012;33:73–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sanchez J, Barach P. High reliability organizations and surgical microsystems: re-engineering surgical care. Surg Clin N Am. 2012;92(1):1–14. doi:10.1016/j.suc.2011.12.005.

  29. Phelps G, Barach P. Why the safety and quality movement has been slow to improve care? Int J Clin Pract. 2014;68(8):932–5.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kurutkan MN, Usta E, Orhan F, Simsekler MC. Application of the IHI Global Trigger Tool in measuring the adverse event rate in a Turkish healthcare setting. Int J Risk Saf Med. 2015;27(1):11–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Barach P, Small SD. Reporting and preventing medical mishaps: lessons from non-medical near miss reporting systems. BMJ. 2000;320:753–76.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kaplan H, Barach P. Incident reporting: science or protoscience? Ten years later. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002;11:144–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Mohr J, Barach P, Cravero J, Blike G, Godfrey M, Batalden P, Nelson E. Microsystems in health care. Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2003;29:401–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Small SD, Barach P, Kelly M. Laying the groundwork for a state-wide confidential voluntary near miss reporting system: Strategic Plan and Feasibility study. In: Proceedings of the National Conference on Quality and Safety in Health Care. Joint Commission Resources and the National Patient Safety Foundation; 2000. p. 202–11.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Uribe CL, Schweikhart SB, Pathak DS, et al. Perceived barriers to medical‐error reporting: an exploratory investigation. J Healthc Manag. 2002;47:263–79.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Barach P. Lessons from the US patient safety movement. In: Emslie S, Knox K, Pickstone M, editors. Improving patient safety: insights from American, Australian and British Healthcare. Proceedings of a joint ECRI and Department of Health conference to introduce the National Patient Safety Agency. ECRI and the Department of Health, United Kingdom; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Bognar A, Barach P, Johnson J, Duncan R, Woods D, Holl J, Birnbach D, Bacha E. Errors and the burden of errors: attitudes, perceptions and the culture of safety in pediatric cardiac surgical teams. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;(4):1374–81.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mohr J, Barach, P. The role of microsystems. In: Carayon, editor. Handbook of human factors and ergonomics in health care and patient safety. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; 2006. p. 95–107.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Stanhope N, Crowley-Murphy M, Vincent C, O’Connor AM, Taylor-Adams SE. An evaluation of adverse incident reporting. J Eval Clin Pract. 1999;5(1):5–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wilson RM, Runciman WB, Gibberd RW, et al. The quality in Australian health care study. Med J Aust. 1995;163:458–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Barach P, Small S, Cooper J. Safety in anesthesia. In: Hurford, Bailin, editors. Clinical anesthesia procedures of the Massachusetts General Hospital. 5th ed. Little Brown; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Vincent C, Stanhope N, Crowley‐Murphy M. Reasons for not reporting adverse incidents: an empirical study. J Eval Clin Pract. 1999;513–21.

    Google Scholar 

  43. McKinnon RC. Safety Management: Near Miss Identification, Recognition, and Investigation. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Barach P, Small SD, Kaplan H. Designing a confidential safety reporting system: in depth review of thirty major medical incident reporting systems, and near-miss safety reporting systems in the nuclear, aviation, and petrochemical industries. Anesthesiology. 1999;91:A1209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. March JG, Sproull LS, Tamuz M. Learning from samples of one or fewer. Organ Sci. 1991;2:1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Gambino R, Mallon O. Near misses—an untapped database to find root causes. Lab Report. 1991;13:41–4.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Barach P, Mohr J. The new frontier: from accidents to near misses and adverse events. BMJ. 2001;322:1320–1.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Van der Schaff TW. Development of a near miss management system at a chemical process plant. In: Van der Schaff TW, Hale AR, Lucas DA, editors. Near miss reporting as a safety tool. Oxford: Butterworth and Heinemann; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Aviation Safety Reporting System Program Overview. NASA Aviation Reporting System, Moffett Field, Ca (http://asrs.arc.nasa.gov).

  50. Barach P, Kelly M. Medical errors and patient safety in Massachusetts: what is the role of the commonwealth? Massachusetts Issue Brief (Mass Health Policy Forum; 2000. Available at Forum). 2000;(10):1–32. PubMed PMID: 12772704.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Billings CE. Some hopes and concerns regarding medical event reporting systems: lessons from the NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (ASRS). Editorial. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1998;121:214–5.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Barach P, Hamman W, Rutherford W. Medical team training: what have we learned from aviation-a systems approach. In: Proceedings of the international conference on team resource management in the 21st century, Embry Riddle University, Daytona Beach, FL, October 23–24, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Reynard WD, Billings CE, Cheney ES, Hardy R. The development of the NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System. NASA Reference Publication 1114, 1986. NASA Aeronautics and Space Administration, Scientific and Technical Information Branch (http://www-afo.arc.nasa.gov/ASRS/callback.html).

  54. Ives G. Near miss reporting pitfalls for nuclear plants. In: Van der Shaff, Lucas DA, Hale AR, editors. Near miss reporting as a safety tool. Oxford: Butterworth and Heinemann; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Carroll J. Incident reviews in high-hazard industries: sense making and learning under ambiguity and accountability. Ind Environ Crisis Q. 1995;9(2):175–97.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Van Vuuren W. Organizational failure: an exploratory study in the steel industry, and the medical domain. PhD Thesis: Eindhoven University of Technology; 1998. Sagan SD. The limits of safety: organizations, accidents, and nuclear weapons. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Apostolakis G, Wu JS. A structured approach to the assessing of the quality culture in Nuclear Installations. In: Proceedings of the International Topic Meeting on Safety Culture in Nuclear Installations. La Grange Park: American Nuclear Society; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Budnitz RJ, Lambert HE, Apostolakis G. A methodology for analyzing precursors to earthquake-initiated and fire-initiated accident sequences. Report NUREG/CR-6544. Washington: Nuclear Regulatory Commission; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Apostolakis G, Barach P. Lessons learned from nuclear power. In: Hatlie M, Tavill K, editors. Patient safety, international textbook. Aspen Publications; 2003. p. 205–25.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Wilwerding J, White A, Apostolakis G, Barach P, Fillipo B, Graham L. Modeling techniques and patient safety. In: Spitzer C, Schmocker U, Dang VN, editors. Probabilistic safety assessment and management, vol. 4. Berlin: Springer; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Institute of Nuclear Power Operations. Human performance enhancement system. Atlanta: INPO 90-005; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Lucas DA. Human performance data collection in industrial systems. In: Human reliability in nuclear power. London: IBC Technical Services; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Corcoran WR. The phoenix handbook: the ultimate event evaluation manual for finding profit improvement in adverse events. Windsor: Nuclear Safety Review Concepts; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Langley G, Nolan K, Nolan T, Norman C, Provost L, editors. The improvement guide. San Francisco: Josey-Bass; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Robertson L. Injury epidemiology, research and control strategies. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Berwick DM. Continuous improvement as an ideal in health care. N Engl J Med. 1989;370:53–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Millenson M. Demanding medical excellence, doctors and accountability in the information age. Chicago: University of Chicago; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan A. Sanchez MD, MPA .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sanchez, J.A., Barach, P. (2017). Capturing, Reporting, and Learning from Adverse Events. In: Sanchez, J., Barach, P., Johnson, J., Jacobs, J. (eds) Surgical Patient Care. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44010-1_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44010-1_40

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44008-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44010-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation