Abstract
The prevailing epistemological perspective on school mathematical knowledge values the central role of induction and deduction in the development of necessary mathematical knowledge with a rather taken-for-granted view of abduction. This chapter will present empirical evidence that illustrates the relationship between abductive action and the emergence of necessary mathematical knowledge.
Recent empirical studies on abduction and mathematical knowledge construction have begun to explore ways in which abduction could be implemented in more systematic terms. In this chapter four types of inferences that students develop in mathematical activity are presented and compared followed by a presentation of key findings from current research on abduction in mathematics and science education. The chapter closes with an exploration of ways in which students can effectively enact meaningful and purposeful abductive thinking processes through activities that enable them to focus on relational or orientation understandings. Four suggestions are provided, which convey the need for meaningful, structured, and productive abduction actions. Together the suggestions target central features in abductive cognition, that is, thinking, reasoning, processing, and disposition.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. Shotter: Bateson, double description, Todes, and embodiment: Preparing activities and their relation to abduction, J. Theory Soc. Behav. 39(2), 219–245 (2009)
C. El Khachab: The logical goodness of abduction in C. S. Peirce’s thought, Trans. Charles S. Peirce Soc. 49(2), 157–177 (2013)
F. Rivera: Changing the face of arithmetic: Teaching children algebra, Teach. Child. Math. 12(6), 306–311 (2006)
F. Rivera: Visual templates in pattern generalization activity, Educ. Stud. Math. 73, 297–328 (2010)
G. Bateson: Mind in Nature: A Necessary Unity (Fontana/Collins, London 1979)
D. Holton, K. Stacey, G. FitzSimons: Reasoning: A dog’s tale, Aust. Math. Teach. 68(3), 22–26 (2012)
C. Peirce: Collected Papers of Charles Saunders Peirce, Vol. 5 (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge 1934)
J. Mason, M. Stephens, A. Watson: Appreciating mathematical structures for all, Math. Educ. Res. J. 21(2), 10–32 (2009)
B. Pedemonte: How can the relationship between argumentation and proof be analyzed?, Educ. Stud. Math. 66, 23–41 (2008)
T. Addis, D. Gooding: Simulation methods for an abductive system in science, Found. Sci. 13, 37–52 (2008)
L. Magnani: Conjectures and manipulations: Computational modeling and the extra-theoretical dimension of scientific discovery, Minds Mach. 14, 507–537 (2004)
S. Paavola: Abduction as a logic and methodology of discovery: The importance of strategies, Found. Sci. 9, 267–283 (2004)
A. Heeffer: Learning concepts through the history of mathematics: The case of symbolic algebra. In: Philosophical Dimensions in Mathematics Education, ed. by K. Francois, J.P. Van Bendegem (Springer, Dordrecht 2010) pp. 83–103
U. Goswami: Inductive and deductive reasoning. In: The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development, ed. by U. Goswami (Wiley-Blackwell, Malden 2011) pp. 399–419
C. Peirce: Collected Papers of Charles Saunders Peirce, Vol. 1/2 (Belnap Press of Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge 1960)
B. Pillow, R. Pearson, M. Hecht, A. Bremer: Children’s and adults’ judgments of the certainty of deductive inference, inductive inferences, and guesses, J. Genet. Epistemol. 171(3), 203–217 (2010)
G. Polya: Induction and Analogy in Mathematics, Mathematics and Plausible Reasoning, Vol. 1 (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton 1973)
B. Haig: Precis of ‘‘an abductive theory of scientific method, J. Clin. Psychol. 64(9), 1019–1022 (2008)
S. Paavola: Diagrams, iconicity, and abductive discovery, Semiotica 186(1/4), 297–314 (2011)
M. Tschaepe: Guessing and abduction, Trans. Charles S. Peirce Soc. 50(1), 115–138 (2014)
G.-J. Kruijff: Peirce’s late theory of abduction: A comprehensive account, Semiotica 153(1/4), 431–454 (2005)
P. Thagard: Semiosis and hypothetic inference in C. S. Peirce, Versus Quaderni Di Studi Semiotici 19/20, 163–172 (1978)
U. Eco: Horns, hooves, insteps: Some hypotheses on three types of abduction. In: The Sign of Three: Dupin, Holmes, Peirce, ed. by U. Eco, T. Sebeok (Indiana Univ. Press, Bloomington 1983) pp. 198–220
J. Josephson, S. Josephson: Abductive Inference: Computation, Philosophy, Technology (Cambridge University Press, New York 1994)
S. Paavola: Hansonian and Harmanian abduction as models of discovery, Int. Stud. Philos. Sci. 20(1), 93–108 (2006)
J. Adler: Introduction: Philosophical foundations. In: Reasoning: Studies of Human Inference and Its Foundations, ed. by J. Adler, L. Rips (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge 2008) pp. 1–34
J. Josephson: Smart inductive generalizations are abductions. In: Abduction and Induction: Essays on Their Relation and Integration, ed. by P. Flach, A. Kakas (Kluwer, Dordrecht 2000) pp. 31–44
J. Hibben: Logic: Deductive and Inductive (Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York 1905)
C. Peirce: Grounds of validity of the laws of logic: Further consequences of four incapacities, J. Specul. Philos. 2, 193–208 (1869)
A. Norton: Josh’s operational conjectures: Abductions of a splitting operation and the construction of new fractional schemes, J. Res. Math. Educ. 39(4), 401–430 (2008)
N. Prusak, R. Hershkowitz, B. Schwarz: From visual reasoning to logical necessity through argumentative design, Educ. Stud. Math. 74, 185–205 (2012)
T. Parker, S. Baldridge: Elementary Mathematics for Teachers (Sefton-Ash Publishing, Okemos 2004)
L. Smith: Reasoning by Mathematical Induction in Children’s Arithmetic (Elsevier Science Ltd., Oxford 2002)
F. Rivera: Toward a Visually-Oriented School Mathematics Curriculum: Research, Theory, Practice, and Issues (Springer, New York 2011)
F. Arzarello: The proof in the 20th century. In: Theorems in Schools: From History, Epistemology, and Cognition in Classroom Practices, ed. by P. Boero (Sense Publishers, Rotterdam 2006) pp. 43–64
B. Pedemonte, D. Reid: The role of abduction in proving processes, Educ. Stud. Math. 76, 281–303 (2011)
F. Rivera: From math drawings to algorithms: Emergence of whole number operations in children, ZDM 46(1), 59–77 (2014)
F. Arzarello, C. Sabena: Semiotic and theoretic control in argumentation and proof activities, Educ. Stud. Math. 77, 189–206 (2011)
M. Martinez, B. Pedemonte: Relationship between inductive arithmetic argumentation and deductive algebraic proof, Educ. Stud. Math. 86, 125–149 (2014)
P. Boero, R. Garuti, M. Mariotti: Some dynamic mental processes underlying producing and proving conjectures, Proc. 20th Conf. Int. Group Psychol. Math. Educ., Vol. 2, ed. by L. Puig, A. Gutierrez (IGPME, Valencia 1996) pp. 121–128
P. Boero, N. Douek, F. Morselli, B. Pedemonte: Argumentation and proof: A contribution to theoretical perspectives and their classroom implementation, Proc. 34th Conf. Int. Group Psychol. Math. Educ., Vol. 1, ed. by M. Pinto, T. Kawasaki (IGPME, Belo Horizante 2010) pp. 179–204
A. Watson, S. Shipman: Using learner generated examples to introduce new concepts, Educ. Stud. Math. 69, 97–109 (2008)
L. Radford: Iconicity and contraction: A semiotic investigation of forms of algebraic generalizations of patterns in different contexts, ZDM 40, 83–96 (2008)
F. Rivera: Teaching and Learning Patterns in School Mathematics: Psychological and Pedagogical Considerations (Springer, New York 2013)
M. Sintonen: Reasoning to hypotheses: Where do questions come?, Found. Sci. 9, 249–266 (2004)
Acknowledgements
The research that is reported in this chapter has been funded by the National Science Foundation under Grant Number DRL 0448649. All the views and opinions expressed in this report are solely the author’s responsibility and do not necessarily reflect the views of the foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rivera, F. (2017). Abduction and the Emergence of Necessary Mathematical Knowledge. In: Magnani, L., Bertolotti, T. (eds) Springer Handbook of Model-Based Science. Springer Handbooks. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30526-4_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30526-4_25
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-30525-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30526-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)