Abduction and the Emergence of Necessary Mathematical Knowledge

  • Chapter
Springer Handbook of Model-Based Science

Part of the book series: Springer Handbooks ((SHB))

Abstract

The prevailing epistemological perspective on school mathematical knowledge values the central role of induction and deduction in the development of necessary mathematical knowledge with a rather taken-for-granted view of abduction. This chapter will present empirical evidence that illustrates the relationship between abductive action and the emergence of necessary mathematical knowledge.

Recent empirical studies on abduction and mathematical knowledge construction have begun to explore ways in which abduction could be implemented in more systematic terms. In this chapter four types of inferences that students develop in mathematical activity are presented and compared followed by a presentation of key findings from current research on abduction in mathematics and science education. The chapter closes with an exploration of ways in which students can effectively enact meaningful and purposeful abductive thinking processes through activities that enable them to focus on relational or orientation understandings. Four suggestions are provided, which convey the need for meaningful, structured, and productive abduction actions. Together the suggestions target central features in abductive cognition, that is, thinking, reasoning, processing, and disposition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 277.13
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
EUR 349.00
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Shotter: Bateson, double description, Todes, and embodiment: Preparing activities and their relation to abduction, J. Theory Soc. Behav. 39(2), 219–245 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. C. El Khachab: The logical goodness of abduction in C. S. Peirce’s thought, Trans. Charles S. Peirce Soc. 49(2), 157–177 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. F. Rivera: Changing the face of arithmetic: Teaching children algebra, Teach. Child. Math. 12(6), 306–311 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. Rivera: Visual templates in pattern generalization activity, Educ. Stud. Math. 73, 297–328 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. G. Bateson: Mind in Nature: A Necessary Unity (Fontana/Collins, London 1979)

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Holton, K. Stacey, G. FitzSimons: Reasoning: A dog’s tale, Aust. Math. Teach. 68(3), 22–26 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. Peirce: Collected Papers of Charles Saunders Peirce, Vol. 5 (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge 1934)

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Mason, M. Stephens, A. Watson: Appreciating mathematical structures for all, Math. Educ. Res. J. 21(2), 10–32 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. B. Pedemonte: How can the relationship between argumentation and proof be analyzed?, Educ. Stud. Math. 66, 23–41 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. T. Addis, D. Gooding: Simulation methods for an abductive system in science, Found. Sci. 13, 37–52 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. L. Magnani: Conjectures and manipulations: Computational modeling and the extra-theoretical dimension of scientific discovery, Minds Mach. 14, 507–537 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Paavola: Abduction as a logic and methodology of discovery: The importance of strategies, Found. Sci. 9, 267–283 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Heeffer: Learning concepts through the history of mathematics: The case of symbolic algebra. In: Philosophical Dimensions in Mathematics Education, ed. by K. Francois, J.P. Van Bendegem (Springer, Dordrecht 2010) pp. 83–103

    Google Scholar 

  14. U. Goswami: Inductive and deductive reasoning. In: The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development, ed. by U. Goswami (Wiley-Blackwell, Malden 2011) pp. 399–419

    Google Scholar 

  15. C. Peirce: Collected Papers of Charles Saunders Peirce, Vol. 1/2 (Belnap Press of Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge 1960)

    Google Scholar 

  16. B. Pillow, R. Pearson, M. Hecht, A. Bremer: Children’s and adults’ judgments of the certainty of deductive inference, inductive inferences, and guesses, J. Genet. Epistemol. 171(3), 203–217 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. G. Polya: Induction and Analogy in Mathematics, Mathematics and Plausible Reasoning, Vol. 1 (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton 1973)

    Google Scholar 

  18. B. Haig: Precis of ‘‘an abductive theory of scientific method, J. Clin. Psychol. 64(9), 1019–1022 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. S. Paavola: Diagrams, iconicity, and abductive discovery, Semiotica 186(1/4), 297–314 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. Tschaepe: Guessing and abduction, Trans. Charles S. Peirce Soc. 50(1), 115–138 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. G.-J. Kruijff: Peirce’s late theory of abduction: A comprehensive account, Semiotica 153(1/4), 431–454 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  22. P. Thagard: Semiosis and hypothetic inference in C. S. Peirce, Versus Quaderni Di Studi Semiotici 19/20, 163–172 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  23. U. Eco: Horns, hooves, insteps: Some hypotheses on three types of abduction. In: The Sign of Three: Dupin, Holmes, Peirce, ed. by U. Eco, T. Sebeok (Indiana Univ. Press, Bloomington 1983) pp. 198–220

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. Josephson, S. Josephson: Abductive Inference: Computation, Philosophy, Technology (Cambridge University Press, New York 1994)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. S. Paavola: Hansonian and Harmanian abduction as models of discovery, Int. Stud. Philos. Sci. 20(1), 93–108 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. J. Adler: Introduction: Philosophical foundations. In: Reasoning: Studies of Human Inference and Its Foundations, ed. by J. Adler, L. Rips (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge 2008) pp. 1–34

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. J. Josephson: Smart inductive generalizations are abductions. In: Abduction and Induction: Essays on Their Relation and Integration, ed. by P. Flach, A. Kakas (Kluwer, Dordrecht 2000) pp. 31–44

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. J. Hibben: Logic: Deductive and Inductive (Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York 1905)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. C. Peirce: Grounds of validity of the laws of logic: Further consequences of four incapacities, J. Specul. Philos. 2, 193–208 (1869)

    Google Scholar 

  30. A. Norton: Josh’s operational conjectures: Abductions of a splitting operation and the construction of new fractional schemes, J. Res. Math. Educ. 39(4), 401–430 (2008)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. N. Prusak, R. Hershkowitz, B. Schwarz: From visual reasoning to logical necessity through argumentative design, Educ. Stud. Math. 74, 185–205 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  32. T. Parker, S. Baldridge: Elementary Mathematics for Teachers (Sefton-Ash Publishing, Okemos 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  33. L. Smith: Reasoning by Mathematical Induction in Children’s Arithmetic (Elsevier Science Ltd., Oxford 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  34. F. Rivera: Toward a Visually-Oriented School Mathematics Curriculum: Research, Theory, Practice, and Issues (Springer, New York 2011)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. F. Arzarello: The proof in the 20th century. In: Theorems in Schools: From History, Epistemology, and Cognition in Classroom Practices, ed. by P. Boero (Sense Publishers, Rotterdam 2006) pp. 43–64

    Google Scholar 

  36. B. Pedemonte, D. Reid: The role of abduction in proving processes, Educ. Stud. Math. 76, 281–303 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. F. Rivera: From math drawings to algorithms: Emergence of whole number operations in children, ZDM 46(1), 59–77 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. F. Arzarello, C. Sabena: Semiotic and theoretic control in argumentation and proof activities, Educ. Stud. Math. 77, 189–206 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. M. Martinez, B. Pedemonte: Relationship between inductive arithmetic argumentation and deductive algebraic proof, Educ. Stud. Math. 86, 125–149 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. P. Boero, R. Garuti, M. Mariotti: Some dynamic mental processes underlying producing and proving conjectures, Proc. 20th Conf. Int. Group Psychol. Math. Educ., Vol. 2, ed. by L. Puig, A. Gutierrez (IGPME, Valencia 1996) pp. 121–128

    Google Scholar 

  41. P. Boero, N. Douek, F. Morselli, B. Pedemonte: Argumentation and proof: A contribution to theoretical perspectives and their classroom implementation, Proc. 34th Conf. Int. Group Psychol. Math. Educ., Vol. 1, ed. by M. Pinto, T. Kawasaki (IGPME, Belo Horizante 2010) pp. 179–204

    Google Scholar 

  42. A. Watson, S. Shipman: Using learner generated examples to introduce new concepts, Educ. Stud. Math. 69, 97–109 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. L. Radford: Iconicity and contraction: A semiotic investigation of forms of algebraic generalizations of patterns in different contexts, ZDM 40, 83–96 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. F. Rivera: Teaching and Learning Patterns in School Mathematics: Psychological and Pedagogical Considerations (Springer, New York 2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  45. M. Sintonen: Reasoning to hypotheses: Where do questions come?, Found. Sci. 9, 249–266 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research that is reported in this chapter has been funded by the National Science Foundation under Grant Number DRL 0448649. All the views and opinions expressed in this report are solely the author’s responsibility and do not necessarily reflect the views of the foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ferdinand Rivera .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rivera, F. (2017). Abduction and the Emergence of Necessary Mathematical Knowledge. In: Magnani, L., Bertolotti, T. (eds) Springer Handbook of Model-Based Science. Springer Handbooks. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30526-4_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30526-4_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-30525-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30526-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation