Tactual discrimination of softness: abilities and mechanisms

  • Chapter
Somesthesis and the Neurobiology of the Somatosensory Cortex

Part of the book series: Advances in Life Sciences ((ALS))

Summary

The ability of human subjects to discriminate softness was investigated. In addition, the associated mechanistic cues and the peripheral neural codes on which the discrimination may be based were investigated using monkeys. Two sets of compliant objects were constructed: (1) those with a deformable surface, composed of transparent silicone rubber of variable softness; (2) rigid plates supported by springs of variable compliance in cylindrical sleeves. To assess the relative contributions of tactile and kinesthetic information, psychophysical experiments were performed on human subjects under both active and passive touch, with or without local anesthesia that blocked the tactile information from the fingerpads. The results for objects with deformable surfaces show that whereas the subjects are quite good at discriminating subtle differences in softness under both active and passive touch without anesthesia, they are unable to discriminate even large differences under active touch with anesthesia. Therefore, we conclude that the discrimination is based entirely on tactile information. The mechanistic data for rubber specimens indicates that the basis for the perception of softness of rubber-like objects is likely to be the spatio-temporal variation of pressure on the skin (or, equivalently, the skin displacement and its derivatives). Neurophysiological data shows that the resulting responses from slowly adapting type I afferent population within the skin might encode the compliance of the objects. For compliant objects with rigid surfaces best discrimination was achieved only with active touch, due to the availability of both tactile and kinesthetic information; under passive conditions, the absence of kinesthetic information resulted in considerable deterioration of discriminability

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 85.59
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 106.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Harper, R. (1952) Psychological and psychophysical aspects of studies of craftsmanship in dairying.British Journal of Psychology Monograph Supplement28:1–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, R., and Stevens, S. S. (1964) Subjective hardness of compliant materials.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology16:204–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L.A., and Hunter, I.W. (1990) A perceptual analysis of stiffness.Experimental Brain Research79:150–156.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D. (1938) The judgements of test bakers. A psychological study.Occupational Psychology12:139–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaMotte, R.H., and Srinivasan, M.A. (1993) Responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors to the shape of objects applied to the primate fingerpad.Acta Psychologica84:41–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • LaMotte, R.H., Zhang, J. and Yan, J. (1994) Tactile signals generated by a tool used to discriminate the softness of objects.Society for Neuroscience Abstracts20:1381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roland, P.E. and Ladegaard-Pedersen, H. (1977) A quantitative analysis of sensations of tension and of kinaesthesia in man.Brain100:671–692.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, M.A., and LaMotte, R.H. (1987) Tactile discrimination of shape: Responses of slowly and rapidly adapting mechanoreceptive afferents to a step indented into the monkey fingerpad.Journal of Neuroscience7:1682–1697.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, M.A., and LaMotte, R.H. (1991) Encoding of shape in the responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors. In: O. Franzen and J. Westman (Eds.),Information Processing in the Somatosensory System, Wenner-Gren International Symposium Series, Macmillan Press, London, pp 59–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, M.A. and LaMotte, R.H. (1995) Tactual discrimination of softness.Journal of Neurophysiology73:88–101.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, H.Z., Durlach, N.I., Beauregard, G.L., and Srinivasan, M.A. (1995) Manual discrimination of compliance using active pinch grasp: The roles of force and work cues.Perception and Psychophysics57:495–510.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Birkhäuser Verlag Basel/Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Srinivasan, M.A., LaMotte, R.H. (1996). Tactual discrimination of softness: abilities and mechanisms. In: Franzén, O., Johansson, R., Terenius, L. (eds) Somesthesis and the Neurobiology of the Somatosensory Cortex. Advances in Life Sciences. Birkhäuser Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-9016-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-9016-8_11

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser Basel

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-0348-9868-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-0348-9016-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation