Advanced Analytics for Drilling and Blasting

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advanced Analytics in Mining Engineering

Abstract

The mining operation is associated with uncertainties that are not limited to ore characteristics and market demand; operational costs, operational performance, regulations are all a part of these uncertainties. Managing these uncertainties effectively and consistently through the mine life helps miners to maintain sustainability in their operations. Drilling and blasting as a key activity in the mining cycle have a key role in operational risk management. Many empirical methods have been developed to determine blast design parameters or the prediction of blast outcomes. However, these methods cannot cover all associated parameters and factors in design or prediction. Applications of advanced analytical methods, including AI-capable engineers, develop powerful tools that consider multiple parameters to predict blasting results or determine design parameters to achieve desired results. This chapter shows how analytical models can optimize blast patterns according to the real bench geometry and discusses advanced analytical solutions for predicting blast fragmentation and vibration by considering affecting parameters on the blast outcomes. In addition, it presents developed models based on recorded data in a mine site that can be used to determine blast design parameters to achieve desired blast outcomes. Discussed models in this chapter are based on AI and machine learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Calnan, J.T. 2015. Determination of explosive energy partition values in rock blasting through small-scale testing. University of Kentucky.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ouchterlony, F., et al. 2004. Where does the explosive energy in rock blasting rounds go? Science and Technology of Energetic Materials 65 (2): 54–63.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nobel, D. 2010. Blasting and explosives quick reference guide. Kalgoorlie: Dyno Nobel Asia Pacific Pty Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang, Z.-X. 2016. Rock fracture and blasting: Theory and applications. Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shadabfar, M., et al. 2021. Estimation of damage induced by single-hole rock blasting: A review on analytical, numerical, and experimental solutions. Energies 14 (1): 29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bhandari, S. 1997. Engineering rock blasting operations.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Langefors, U., and B. Kihlström. 1963. The modern technique of rock blasting, vol. 405. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Darling, P. 2011. SME mining engineering handbook. Vol. 1. SME.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hustrulid, W.A., M. Kuchta, and R.K. Martin. 2013. Open pit mine planning and design, two-volume set and CD-ROM pack. CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hustrulid, W.A. 1999. Blasting principles for open pit mining: General design concepts. Balkema.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lilly, P.A. 1986. An empirical method of assessing rock mass blast ability.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cunningham, C. 1987. Fragmentation estimations and the Kuz-Ram model-four years on. In Proceedings of 2nd international symposium on rock fragmentation by blasting.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Osanloo, M., and A. Hekmat. 2005. Prediction of shovel productivity in the Gol-e-Gohar iron mine. Journal of Mining Science 41 (2): 177–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. International Society of Explosives, E. 2011. ISEE blasters’ handbook. Cleveland, Ohio: International Society of Explosives Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jimeno, C.L., et al. 1995. Drilling änd blasting of rocks.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Singh, P., et al. 2016. Rock fragmentation control in opencast blasting. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering 8 (2): 225–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rosin, P. 1933. Laws governing the fineness of powdered coal. Journal of Institute of Fuel 7: 29–36.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Koshelev, E., et al. 1971. Statistics of the fragments forming with the destruction of solids by the explosion. Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics 12 (2): 244–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kuznetsov, V. 1973. The mean diameter of the fragments formed by blasting rock. Soviet Mining 9 (2): 144–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ouchterlony, F. 2016. The case for the median fragment size as a better fragment size descriptor than the mean. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering 49 (1): 143–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cunningham, C. 1983. The Kuz-Ram model for production of fragmentation from blasting. In Proceedings of 1st symposium on rock fragmentation by blasting, Lulea.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lizotte, Y.C. 1990. Empirical procedures for prediction of rock fragmentation by blasting. Canada Centre for Mineral and Energy Technology, Mining Research Laboratories.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ouchterlony, F. 2005. The Swebrec© function: Linking fragmentation by blasting and crushing. Mining Technology 114: 29–44.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Duvall, W.I., and D.E. Fogelson. 1962. Review of criteria for estimating damage to residences from blasting vibration, vol. 5968. US Bur Mines.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ambraseys, N.R., A.J. Hendron, K.G. Stagg, and O.C. Zienkiewicz, eds. 1968. Dynamic behaviour of rockmasses. In Rock mechanics in rock mechanics in engineering practice, pp. 203–207. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ghosh, A., and J.K. Daemen. 1983. A simple new blast predictor of ground vibrations ınduced predictor. In Proceedings of the 24th US Symposium on Rock Mechanics, 20–23 June. Texas, USA

    Google Scholar 

  27. Balbas Anton, M. and J. Diaz Garcia. 1995. Spatial relation between laws of vibration from blasting. International Journal of Surface Mining and Reclamation 9(4): 161–164.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Singh, S.R., and R.D. Lamond. 1993. Prediction and measurements of blast vibrations. International Journal of Surface Mining and Reclamation 7(4): 149–154.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Roy, P.P. 1991. Prediction and control of ground vibration due to blasting. Colliery Guardian (United Kingdom) 239(7).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sahu, R. 2020. AI in drill and blast.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mohamed, M.T. 2009. Artificial neural network for predicting and controlling blasting vibrations in Assiut (Egypt) limestone quarry. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 46 (2): 426–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Amnieh, H.B., M. Mozdianfard, and A. Siamaki. 2010. Predicting blasting vibrations in Sarcheshmeh copper mine by a neural network. Safety Science 48 (3): 319–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Petr, V., M. Simoes, and T. Rozgonoyi. 2003. Future development of neural network prediction for blasting design parameter of production blasting. Explosive and Blasting Technique 625–630. Holmberg.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Soofastaei, A. 2020. Data analytics applied to the mining industry. CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Xue, X. 2019. Neuro-fuzzy based approach for prediction of blast-induced ground vibration. Applied Acoustics 152: 73–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Shahnazar, A., et al. 2017. A newly developed approach for predicting ground vibration using a hybrid PSO-optimized ANFIS-based model. Environmental Earth Sciences 76 (15): 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhou, J., et al. 2020. Novel approach for forecasting the blast-induced AOP using a hybrid fuzzy system and firefly algorithm. Engineering with Computers 36 (2): 703–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Martins, P., and A. Soofastaei. 2020. Process analytics. In Data analytics applied to the mining industry, 131–148. CRC Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. Duvall, W.I. and B. Petkoff. 1959. Spherical propagation of explosion-generated strain pulses in rock. US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines.

    Google Scholar 

  40. 2020. Visual AI platform for quarry and mining.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Jha, A., et al. 2020. Detection of geological features using aerial image analysis and machine learning. In Proceedings of the 46th annual conference on explosives and blasting technique, USA: Denver, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Rai, P. 2002. Evaluation of the effects of some blast design parameters on fragmentation in opencast mines. Ph. D. thesis, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Choudhary, B., and R. Arora. 2018. Influence of front row burden on fragmentation, muckpile shape, excavator cycle time, and back break-in surface limestone mines. Iranian Journal of Earth Sciences 10 (1): 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  44. 2020. Burden profiling. Do you measure what you think you are?

    Google Scholar 

  45. Badroddin, M., H. Khoshrou, and A. Siamaki. 2012. Prediction of burden at the sungun copper mine by artificial neural network. In Applications of Computers and Operations Research in the Mineral Industry Symposium Issue (35th APCOM).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Badroddin, M., H. Khoshrou, and A. Siamaki. 2013. Prediction of fragment size distribution from blasting: Artificial neural networks approach.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Benardos, A., and D. Kaliampakos. 2004. Modelling TBM performance with artificial neural networks. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology 19 (6): 597–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Allsman, P.L. 1960. Analysis of explosive action in breaking rock. Transactions AIME 217: 475–476.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Speath, G.L. 1960. Formula for proper blasthole spacing. Engineering News Record 218(3): 53.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Amnieh, H.B., A. Siamaki, and S. Soltani. 2012. Design of blasting pattern in proportion to the peak particle velocity (PPV): Artificial neural networks approach. Safety Science 50 (9): 1913–1916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Amoako, R.A.J., A. 2020. Rock fragmentation prediction using machine learning.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Khoshrou, H., M. Badroddin, and E. Bakhtavar (2010) Determination of the practicable burden in Sungun open-pit mine, Iran. In Rock Fragmentation by Blasting, ed. J.A. Sanchidrián, pp. 271–276. London: Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Siamaki .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Siamaki, A. (2022). Advanced Analytics for Drilling and Blasting. In: Soofastaei, A. (eds) Advanced Analytics in Mining Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91589-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91589-6_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-91588-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-91589-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation