Abstract
The UN SDGs seek to make the world a better place but setting Goals alone will fail to achieve that end. With tight timescales, success demands collective action from States, communities and individuals. Collective action requires a shared focus, a sense of urgency, and engagement. New Public Management has fostered forces for change, as devolved action from diverse actors displaces centralised State provision. Collective impact, New Public Management and business strategy approaches all need good measurement to guide and good governance to respond. Social Impact Measurement is key. Through the lenses of Strategic Planning, New Public Management, Collective Impact, Systems Thinking and Actor-Network-Theory this chapter asks whether social impact measurement can respond in time? [Relevant SDGs: SDG17: Partnerships for the Goals].
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beckford, J. (2021). The Intelligent Nation. How to Organise a Country (pp. 24–50). Routledge.
Blake, J., & Villeneuve-Smith, F. (2016). The Art of the Possible in Public Procurement. E3M Publications. Social Business International. https://e3m.org.uk/the-art-of-the-possible-in-public-procurement/. Accessed 21 Feb 2021.
Boobis, S., & Albanese, F. (2020). The Impact of COVID-19 on People Facing Homelessness and Service Provision Across Great Britain. Crisis.
Brown, S., & Capdevila, R. (1999). Actor Network Theory and After. In J. Law & J. Hassard (Eds.), Perpetuum Mobile: Substance, Force, and the Sociology of Translation (pp. 26–50). Blackwell.
Capra, F., & Luisi, P. (2014). The Systems View of Life: A Unifying Vision. CUP. Chapters 14 and 17 (pp. 297–321 and 362–393).
Citizens Advice. (2014). Controlling Money, Controlling Lives: Financial Abuse in Britain. Citizens Advice. https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/Global/Migrated_Documents/corporate/controlling-money-controlling-lives%2D%2D1-.pdf. Accessed 21 Feb 2021.
Clarke, A. (2016). The Prevalence of Rough Slee** and Sofa Surfing Amongst Young People in the UK. Social Inclusion, 4, 60–72.
Clifford, J., Hehenberger, L., & Fantini, M. (2014). Proposed Approaches to Social Impact Measurement in European Commission Legislation and in Practice Relating to EuSEFs and the EaSI. GECES (Groupe d’experts de la Commission sur l’entrepreneuriat social) Sub-Group on Impact Measurement. European Commission. Ref pbKE0414665.
Coombs, J., & Gray, T. (2020). Lessons Learnt from Councils’ Response to Rough Slee** During eth COVID-19 Pandemic. LGA. https://www.local.gov.uk/lessons-learnt-councils-response-rough-slee**-during-covid-19-pandemic. Accessed 21 Feb 2021.
Crown Prosecution Service. (2017). Controlling or Coercive Behaviour in an Intimate or Family Relationship: Legal Guidance. Domestic Abuse. https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/controlling-or-coercive-behaviour-intimate-or-family-relationship. Accessed 21 Feb 2021.
Culler, J. (1975). Structuralist Poetics. Structuralism, Linguistics and the Study of Literature (p. 131). Routledge/Kegan Paul.
Davies, B. (2016). In Filthy, Dangerous Accommodation, Britain’s Hidden Homeless Are Suffering. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/housing-network/2016/jan/20/britain-hidden-homeless-temporary-accommodation-ippr. Accessed 21 Feb 2021.
Ferlie, E., Ashburner, L., Fitzgerald, L., & Pettigrew, A. (1996). The New Public Management in Action. OUP. pp. 10ff.
Fitzpatrick, S., Pawson, H., Bramley, G., Wood, J., Watts, B., Stephens, M., & Blenkinsopp, J. (2019). The Homelessness Monitor: England 2019. Crisis.
GIIN. (2021). IRIS+: An Impact Measurement and Management System. https://iris.thegiin.org/. Accessed 21 Feb 2021.
Home Office. (2020). Domestic Abuse Bill 2020: Overarching Factsheet. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/domestic-abuse-bill-2020-factsheets/domestic-abuse-bill-2020-overarching-factsheet. Accessed 21 Feb 2021.
Hood, C. (1991). A Public Management for All Seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.
Justesen, L., & Mouritsen, J. (2011). Effects of Actor-Network Theory in Accounting Research. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 24(2), 161–193.
Kania, J., & Kramer, M. (2011). Collective Impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review, (Winter), 36–41.
Klijn, E.-H., & Koppenjan, J. (2000). Public Management and Policy Networks: Foundations of a Network Approach to Governance. Public Management, 2(2), 135–158.
Klijn, E.-H., & Koppenjan, J. (2004). Managing Uncertainties in Networks: A Network Approach to Problem Solving and Decision Making (pp. 9, 160–239). Routledge.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory (pp. 4ff and 106ff). OUP.
Law, J. (2007). Actor Network Theory and Material Semiotics. Version of 25th April 2007. Available online at: http://www.heterogeneities.net/publications/Law2007ANTandMaterialSemiotics.pdf. Accessed Sept 2020.
Luhmann, N. (2013). Introduction to Systems Theory (p. 28ff.). Trans. P. Gilgen & Ed. D. Baecker. Polity.
Mintzberg, H. (2015). Rebalancing Society: Radical Renewal Beyond Left, Right and Center. Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc.
MOISS (Commission for Mission-Oriented Innovation and Industrial Strategy). (2019). A Mission-Oriented UK Industrial Strategy. UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose.
National Audit Office. (2019). Transforming Rehabilitation: Progress Review (p. 10ff.). London.
Paterson-Young, C., & Hazenberg, R. (2021). Transformative Outcomes. In W. L. Filho, P. Gökçin Özuyar, A. M. Azul, L. L. Brandli, & W. Wall (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals: Justice, Peace and Strong Institutions. Springer.
Raven, B. H. (1992). A Power/Interaction Model of Interpersonal Influence: French and Raven Thirty Years Later. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 7(2), 217–244.
Rowland, J., & McCoy, S. (2020). Danger Zones and Step** Stones: Phase Three. Depaul UK. https://uk.depaulcharity.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Exec-Summary-Danger-Zones-and-Step**-Stones-Phase-Three.pdf. Accessed 21 Feb 2021.
Sanders, B., Boobis, S., & Albanese, F. (2019). ‘It Was Like a Nightmare’ The Reality of Sofa Surfing in Britain Today. Crisis. https://www.crisis.org.uk/ending-homelessness/homelessness-knowledge-hub/types-of-homelessness/it-was-like-a-nightmare-the-reality-of-sofa-surfing-in-britain-today/. Accessed 21 Feb 2021.
Shelter. (2019). Strategy 2019–2022. Section 4. https://england.shelter.org.uk/what_we_do/strategy_2019-2022. Accessed 21 Feb 2021.
Shelter. (2020). Homeless at School: 56% of Teachers Have Worked with Homeless Children. https://england.shelter.org.uk/media/press_release/homeless_at_school_56_per_cent_of_teachers_have_worked_with_homeless_children. Accessed 21 Feb 2021.
Stark, E., & Hester, M. (2019). Coercive Control: Update and Review. Violence Against Women, 25(1), 81–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801218816191
Thaler, R., & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Yale University Press.
The British Academy. (2019). Principles for Purposeful Business. How to Deliver the Framework for the Future of the Corporation. An Agenda for Business in the 2020s and Beyond (p. P8). The British Academy.
UN Sustainable Development Goals. (2021). The 17 Goals. Available online at: https://sdgs.un.org/goals. Accessed on: Jan 2021.
UN Sustainable Development Group. (2021). Leave No-One Behind.https://unsdg.un.org/2030-agenda/universal-values/leave-no-one-behind. Accessed Jan 2021.
UNDP. (2021). SDG Impact: Investment Solutions for Global Impact. https://sdgimpact.undp.org/. Accessed 21 Feb 2021.
United Nations. (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld. Accessed 9 May 2020.
van Niekerk, A. (2020). Inclusive Economic Sustainability: SDGs and Global Inequality. Sustainability Basel, Switzerland, 12(13), 5427.
Women’s Aid. (2019). The Domestic Abuse Report 2019: The Economics of Abuse. Women’s Aid.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Clifford, J., Barnes, K. (2022). Why and What to Measure? The Justification for Social Impact Measurement. In: Hazenberg, R., Paterson-Young, C. (eds) Social Impact Measurement for a Sustainable Future. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83152-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83152-3_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-83151-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-83152-3
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)