Abstract
In English linguistics the Gunning Fog Index is used to determine the readability of texts. This methodology isn’t as effective in the Spanish language because the complexity of words isn’t determined by the number of syllables, unlike what happens in English. Therefore, a software was developed that allows us to estimate the readability of an academic text written in Spanish in a quantitative way. This software allows to compare the traditional methodology of the Gunning fog index and a modification to it, using the corpus linguistics for the Spanish language, based on thousands of texts digitized by Google, where the frequency of use of certain words is related. Texts produced by students from first to last semester were evaluated. Each text was subjected to the Gunning fog index assessment methodology and the corpus methodology, changing the percentage of complex words to the percentage of unknown words. In the evaluation of first semester texts it was found that the average fog index was 29.25, and an average of 37.9 complex words, for these same texts was found a modified fog index of 18.62 and 5.1 unknown words. On the other hand, for the evaluation of the texts produced in the last semester, the average fog index was 27.55 and an average of 51.4 complex words, with the modified fog index was an average of 15.08 and 7.1 unknown words. With this study, aspects related to the best use of punctuation marks and the increase of vocabulary related to the profession can be identified in a quantitative way.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ferrando Belart, V.: La legibilidad: un factor fundamental para comprender un texto. Aten. Primaria 34(3), 143–146 (2004)
Brucker, C.: Arkansas tech writing. English 2053(June), 109 (2009)
Mata San Juan, H.: Herramienta de análisis de legibilidad de contenidos educativos. Graduate theses, Departamento de Informática, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (2017)
Frías Delgado, A.: Distribución De Frecuencias De La Longitud De Las Palabras En Español. A Survey of corpus-based Research, pp. 756–770 (2009)
Coserio, E.: Introducción a la Lingüística (1983). https://www.csub.edu/~tfernandez_ulloa/spanishlinguistics/introduccion%20a%20la%20linguistica%20general.pdf
Pitkowski, E.F., Vásquez Gamarra, J.: Tinkuy Boletin de investigación y debate. El uso los corpus lingüísticos como Herram. pedagógica para la enseñanza y Aprendiz. ELE*, no. 11, pp. 31–51 (2005)
Mac Lean, A.: Comunicacion Escrita, pp. 5–17 (1975)
Zamanian, M., Heydari, P.: Readability of texts: state of the art. Theory Pract. Lang. Stud. 2(1), 43–53 (2012)
Felipe Ovares, B., José Alberto, R.B.: Variación del Índice de Niebla Usando un Corpus Obtenido a Partir de los Libros Digitalizados por Google (2010)
Barrio-Cantalejo, I.M., Simón-Lorda, P., Melguizo, M., Escalona, I., Marijuán, M.I., Hernando, P.: Validación de la escala INFLESZ para evaluar la legibilidad de los textos dirigidos a pacientes. An. Sist. Sanit. Navar. 31(2), 135–152 (2008)
Wang, L.W., Miller, M.J., Schmitt, M.R., Wen, F.K.: Assessing readability formula differences with written health information materials: application, results, and recommendations. Res. Soc. Adm. Pharm. 9(5), 503–516 (2013)
Navarro-Royo, C., Monteagudo-Piqueras, O., Rodríquez-Suárez, L., Valentín-López, B., García-Caballero, J.: Legibilidad de los documentos de consentimiento informado del hospital La Paz. Rev. Calid. Asist. 17(6), 331–336 (2002)
Simón Lorda, P., Barrio Cantalejo, I.M., Carro, L.C.: Legibilidad de los formularios escritos de consentimiento informado (1996)
Blanco Pérez, A., Gutiérrez Couto, U.: Legibilidad de las páginas web sobre salud dirigidas a pacientes y lectores de la población general. Rev. Esp. Salud Publica 76(4), 321–331 (2002)
Fitzsimmons, P.R., Michael, B.D., Hulley, J.L., Scott, G.O.: A readability assessment of online Parkinson’s disease information. J. R. Coll. Phys. Edinb. 40(4), 292–296 (2010)
Friedman, D.B., Hoffman-Goetz, L.: A systematic review of readability and comprehension instruments used for print and web-based cancer information. Heal. Educ. Behav. 33(3), 352–373 (2006)
Svider, P.F., et al.: Readability assessment of online patient education materials from academic otolaryngology-head and neck surgery departments. Am. J. Otolaryngol. - Head Neck Med. Surg. 34(1), 31–35 (2013)
Badarudeen, S., Sabharwal, S.: Assessing readability of patient education materials: current role in orthopaedics. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 468(10), 2572–2580 (2010)
O’Mahony, M.P., Smyth, B.: Using readability tests to predict helpful product reviews (2010)
Hu, N., Bose, I., Koh, N.S., Liu, L.: Manipulation of online reviews: an analysis of ratings, readability, and sentiments. Decis. Support Syst. 52(3), 674–684 (2012)
Seely, J.: Oxford Guide to Effective Writing and Speaking: How to Communicate Clearly (2013)
Aluisio, S., Specia, L., Gasperin, C., Scarton, C.: Readability Assessment for Text Simplification (2010)
Montemurro, M.A.: Beyond the Zipf-Mandelbrot law in quantitative linguistics. Phys. A 300, 567–578 (2001)
Michel, J.-B., et al.: Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science 331(6014), 176–182 (2011)
Pechenick, E.A., Danforth, C.M., Dodds, P.S.: Characterizing the Google Books corpus: strong limits to inferences of socio-cultural and linguistic evolution. PLoS ONE 10(10), e0137041 (2015)
Cofré, N., Arce, J.: Librería para obtener las silabas, posición de la silaba tónica, tipo acentuación, hiato, diptongo y triptongo de una palabra. https://github.com/ncofrem/silabajs. Accessed 14 Oct 2019
Fisher, J.: API for Google Ngram Viewer. https://jameshfisher.com/2018/11/25/google-ngram-api/. Accessed 14 Oct 2019
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rodríguez Timaná, L.C., Saavedra Lozano, D.F., Castillo García, J.F. (2020). Software to Determine the Readability of Written Documents by Implementing a Variation of the Gunning Fog Index Using the Google Linguistic Corpus. In: Botto-Tobar, M., Zambrano Vizuete, M., Torres-Carrión, P., Montes León, S., Pizarro Vásquez, G., Durakovic, B. (eds) Applied Technologies. ICAT 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1193. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42517-3_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42517-3_31
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42516-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42517-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)